On 10/11/2011 09:02 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
Linear versioning is of very limited use.
If OpenStack wants to keep a clear definition of what the OpenStack CORE
is, then this needs to evolve linearly (austin, bexar, cactus, diablo,
essex, etc...). I think you could make an argument that this
It supports iSCSI volumes which employ the use of LVM,
http://docs.openstack.org/diablo/openstack-compute/admin/content/managing-volumes.html.
The template file you reference is not the full picture. When you mount a
volume a new snippet of XML is generated and passed to libvirt. The XML would
Hi,
can anyone tell me that if we can implment openstack stroage as
extreemfs.
Regards
Sudhakar
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help
2011/10/11 George Reese george.re...@enstratus.com:
It's wildly inappropriate to equate a thing with its representation.
I didn't say I was right in doing so :)
It's a discussion that gets philosophical rather quickly: Should we
consider a URI to be a reference to a thing or a reference to a
2011/10/11 George Reese george.re...@enstratus.com:
See EC2 for someone doing it damn well. I've never had to write new code to
talk to them unless I want to take advantage of new functionality.
Now I'm confused. EC2 includes the API version in the URI, but I
thought you were opposed to that?
swift uses rsync for some synchronization tasks. But for what I can see, it
mades a very raw usage of it :
In db_replicator.py :
def _rsync_file(self, db_file, remote_file, whole_file=True):
...
popen_args = ['rsync', '--quiet', '--no-motd',
On Oct 12, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
2011/10/11 George Reese george.re...@enstratus.com:
See EC2 for someone doing it damn well. I've never had to write new code to
talk to them unless I want to take advantage of new functionality.
Now I'm confused. EC2 includes the API
On Oct 12, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
2011/10/11 George Reese george.re...@enstratus.com:
It's wildly inappropriate to equate a thing with its representation.
I didn't say I was right in doing so :)
It's a discussion that gets philosophical rather quickly: Should we
consider
I'm not that interested in engines - this does look out of scope, since forcing
something here might prevent people from running mysql cluster (ndb engine is
required then).
I was wondering about indexes though - I was going to submit a patch for it in
the future actually. Since big,
I definitely get why developers working on the code base are in favor of
this, especially for reasons 3 and 4 below. However, there are a couple
of reasons that it might make sense to keep it, and I'd really like to
hear from a different demographic, if at all possible.
First, I'd like to hear
Does anyone meet this problem?
I think it is Django(python) problem.
more log:
2011-10-12 06:22:01DEBUG [eventlet.wsgi.server] 10.200.200.2 - -
[12/Oct/2011 06:22:01] GET /v1/images/4 HTTP/1.1 200 66241 0.109968
2011-10-12 06:22:03DEBUG [glance.api.middleware.version_negotiation]
This may indeed be a Django-related problem... I tried investigating
it a bit (known bug), but that investigation didn't get that far :(
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/862664
Please let's continue this discussion on the bug report above.
Thanks!
-jay
2011/10/12 mao weijie
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Gabe Westmaas
gabe.westm...@rackspace.com wrote:
+1 on modifying it in your environment, this seems outside the scope of
migrations, though perhaps listed as a best practice for the deployment
process.
+1
Similarly, I have been trying to decide what makes
Hey Stackers,
There is a cool FLOSS conference in Kosovo coming up on November 12th
-- Software Freedom Kosova 2011.
If you're interested in speaking there, feel free to check out this blog post:
http://www.flossk.org/en/blog/sfk11
and contact i...@flossk.org.
Cheers!
-jay
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Gabe Westmaas
gabe.westm...@rackspace.com wrote:
I definitely get why developers working on the code base are in favor of
this, especially for reasons 3 and 4 below. However, there are a couple
of reasons that it might make sense to keep it, and I'd really like
On 10/12/11 9:22 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Gabe Westmaas
gabe.westm...@rackspace.com wrote:
I definitely get why developers working on the code base are in favor of
this, especially for reasons 3 and 4 below. However, there are a couple
of
Hi Fabrice,
The design of Swift has always assumed that the backend services are
running on a secured, private network. If this is not going to be the
case, or you would like to provide more security on that network, a
lot more work needs to be done than just rsync. That said, I don't
think it
On 10/11/2011 09:08 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Btw, which APIs are we talking about here? Just compute and storage. Or
image and identity too?
I think this should be much broader and include any API contributed to
the OpenStack banner, including those in the OpenStack Satellite.
This email
Hi Sudhakar -
I'm not terribly familiar with xtreemFS, but glancing at their website, it
looks like it's replicated block-volume mechanism not unlink gluster or ceph.
There is no plugin or back-end that takes the Nova block volume components and
uses this - if it supports an iSCSI interface
On 10/11/2011 10:28 AM, George Reese wrote:
It's wildly inappropriate to equate a thing with its representation.
Unless the thing is itself a representation, yes. A resource can be ANYTHING: a
server, a database record about a server, a car, a rock, the concept of love,
the act of smiling, or
Hey,
I've posted a proposal for how the stable branch could work here:
http://wiki.openstack.org/StableBranch
and a proposed diablo branch for nova:
http://github.com/markmc/nova/tree/diablo
The wiki page seems to be 404 for folks for some bizarre reason, but you
can get to it from:
George Reese wrote:
HTTP methods are well defined and the system should behave in
accordance with those definitions. Otherwise, even saying the word REST
is a joke.
Is your point that because OpenStack APIs should be REST complaint that
there would never be a V2 on a Get operation? That is,
Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com writes:
Hey,
I've posted a proposal for how the stable branch could work here:
http://wiki.openstack.org/StableBranch
and a proposed diablo branch for nova:
http://github.com/markmc/nova/tree/diablo
The wiki page seems to be 404 for folks for some
Gabe Westmaas gabe.westm...@rackspace.com writes:
First, there was widespread agreement that in order for an integration
suite to be run in the openstack jenkins, it should be included in the
community github repository.
Hi,
During the meeting today, folks asked about what the core group is
Hello folks,
given the strong ties between OpenStack community and Ubuntu's, I'd like
to remind every OpenStack developer to go to the upcoming Ubuntu
Developer Summit. Especially for the PTLs, it would be a very
informative event with the Ubuntu Server track as the main attraction.
The UDS is
The extension has nothing to do with representation in HTTP. It's the content
type (in the headers).
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2011, at 17:15, Bryan Taylor btay...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 10/11/2011 10:28 AM, George Reese wrote:
It's wildly inappropriate to equate a thing with its
Sorry for top posting... At a conference and typing from my phone...
The openstack-qa-core group should be for core code committers to the
openstack-integrated-tests project. The fixes team is the one responsible
for the stable branches..
-jay
On Oct 12, 2011 4:13 PM, Nati Ueno
Jim++
#I suppose the scope of openstack-qa-core and fixes are very similar.
2011/10/12 James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com:
Gabe Westmaas gabe.westm...@rackspace.com writes:
First, there was widespread agreement that in order for an integration
suite to be run in the openstack jenkins, it
Using devstack (thank you!) made it easy to see how the keystone/nova
integration was supposed to work and how to use nova client to create
vms, etc. In this case the old method of using nova-manage to create
users and then zipping up credentials to use with euca tools is not
possible. Is
I think the arguments for removing 1.0 are sound. Lets nuke it!
Vish
On Oct 12, 2011, at 7:39 AM, Gabe Westmaas wrote:
On 10/12/11 9:22 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Gabe Westmaas
gabe.westm...@rackspace.com wrote:
I definitely get why
Some of us at hp still use OS Nova Client V1.0 as nova boot command is not
working with V1.1. Not sure if this issue is fixed in Diablo final.
Regards,
Ravi
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to :
Okay, looks like the consensus is to remove it. I do want to wait until the
Ruby bindings are updated to use v1.1 as SmokeStack and one of our VPC jobs
depend on it. Once that happens, I'll send another email to the list.
Waldon
On Oct 12, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
I think
I added etherpads for the Nova Upgrades and Nova Security sessions at the
Design Summit to
EssexSummitEtherpadshttp://wiki.openstack.org/EssexSummitEtherpads. The
etherpads are:
* nova-upgradeshttp://etherpad.openstack.org/nova-upgrades and
*
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 09:04 -0700, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
a group of people interested in academia met in Boston during the
unconference. I was there to take notes and facilitate this community
run initiative. Here is what we agreed so far. I'm sharing it on the
list to gather more ideas.
I
Hi
It’s a great idea. Will help infuse fresh ideas. I would be very interested in
helping out in the co-ordination. More thoughts inline
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+dedutta=cisco@lists.launchpad.net
Cool. I will put in a few IaaS/PaaS papers I read recently.
Debo
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+dedutta=cisco@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+dedutta=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Stefano Maffulli
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 5:07 PM
To:
On 13/10/2011, at 3:15 AM, Bryan Taylor wrote:
On 10/11/2011 10:28 AM, George Reese wrote:
It's wildly inappropriate to equate a thing with its representation.
Unless the thing is itself a representation, yes. A resource can be ANYTHING:
a server, a database record about a server, a car,
You should be able to continue to use novaclient with v1.0 in Diablo. Deploying
Essex will require you to transition off of v1.0.
Brian Waldon
On Oct 12, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Venkatesan, Ravikumar wrote:
Some of us at hp still use OS Nova Client V1.0 as nova boot command is not
working with
My environment:
public ip internal ip(br100)
netmaskgateway
controller: 10.11.3.62 10.200.200.2
255.255.255.010.11.3.1
node: 10.11.3.63 10.200.200.3
255.255.255.010.11.3.1
I used
39 matches
Mail list logo
