On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 02:30:14 +
Rustam Aliyev rus...@code.az wrote:
[...] During this period, I can see
constant read I/O of 3MB/s on each swift device. When I shutdown
object-server I/O goes to zero.
Killing swift-object-server is tantamount to unplugging a disk:
the I/O goes to zero,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Dan Prince dan.pri...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hello all,
We just turned on a Bellows feature that will automatically update Gerrit
reviews with SmokeStack test results. Each Gerrit review should have a
comment that looks something like this:
SmokeStack Results
Hello everyone,
Our general meeting will take place at 21:00 UTC this Tuesday in
#openstack-meeting on IRC. PTLs, if you can't make it, please name a
substitute on [2].
Early tomorrow morning we'll the cut the Essex-2 milestone branches, so
today is the last day for merging featureful code in
Hi Jay,
The tests should not be running concurrently.
We currently have 4 Natty Cloud Servers configured as unit test workers. The
machines are shared between nova/glance/keystone.
The unit test runner is pretty simple:
Hi all,
I think there might be some developers/users of openstack in Beijing, how
about a meet up in next month? I'm about to arrange
a meet-up, then people happen in town can come together, talk with each
other in person. If you have any interesting, please contact
me off the list.
Cheers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
OpenStack Security Advisory: 2011-001
CVE: CVE-2011-4596
Title: Path traversal issues registering malicious images using EC2 API
Date: December 13, 2011
Impact: High
Reporter: David Black
Products: Nova
Affects: All versions
Description:
David
I'm getting really funny ( :( ) results trying to get swift to work w/
keystone.
A few questions (about keystone 2012.1)
a) does the swift middleware work with v1.0 or 2.0 auth?
b) are folks using swift-keystone2 or the middleware bundled with keystone
(auth_token + swift_auth).
c) when trying
Fred,
I can see the plugin-like behavior of the approach you have taken. However,
there are a few components of it that could be improved in order to avoid
adding extra complexity to the scheduler and to nova.
IMO, the parts that add complexity are the additional integrity caching
service,
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:27:28 -0500
andi abes andi.a...@gmail.com wrote:
A few questions (about keystone 2012.1)
Just to facilitate the tip-sharing, here's what I know - not being
an expert in either Swift of Keystone.
a) does the swift middleware work with v1.0 or 2.0 auth?
I heard that
The keystone management API has a validate token method that looks like:
GET /tokens/{tokenId}?belongsTo=tenantId
See
http://docs.openstack.org/incubation/identity-dev-guide/content/Validate_Token-d1e1914.html
Why is the validate token method in the keystone admin API and not the service
API?
Hi Bryan -
There are a couple of points here:
1. The Service API is a subset of the Admin API. There are calls in the
Admin API that need a token with privileged access to be called. The use
of the Service API is a deployment option, but not a requirement (i.e. You
can run Keystone on one
Thanks Vish. Sorry I coudn't update
https://review.openstack.org/#change,1202 on time.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey Everyone,
There are a couple of blueprints marked essential that haven't quite made
it in. The review/update process was
Hi all,
I have been following the installation instructions here:
http://cssoss.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/openstackbookv1-0_csscorp.pdf
And I had a successful install at one stage - then I tried to install
the dashboard, which wanted keystone and now things have gone a little
messy.
I can't explain it off the top of my head.
I don't have a swift installation to play with at the moment, but it's
conceivable that posix_fadvise is slower than we expect (drop_cache is
called more frequently during reads than writes, iirc). That could be
tested by making drop_cache a no-op in
Can anyone explain why Swift doesn't want to utilize page cache _at all_?
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Michael Barton
mike-launch...@weirdlooking.com wrote:
I can't explain it off the top of my head.
I don't have a swift installation to play with at the moment, but it's
conceivable
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Huang Zhiteng winsto...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone explain why Swift doesn't want to utilize page cache _at all_?
It's an artifact of the use case swift was built for - heavy on
writes, and repeat reads (where a cache would help) are very rare.
Having that
16 matches
Mail list logo