+1
Great discussion and not anything that should be blocking distributed
scheduler.
-S
From: Eric Day [e...@oddments.org]
Ok. :) The original statement felt like it was written with negative
connotations, and I just wanted to say I think it's all
Thanks Andy,
Yes, after the discussions we had I dug into that approach and ran into some
issues that suggested it would be difficult to implement for cactus. I
summarized our discussion in this thread for the community to review and it
flagged concerns. It also highlighted other issues that
Or blueprints.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 24, 2011, at 6:34 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Andy Smith wrote:
Sorry if I am just way out of the loop here, but where do we submit talk
proposals / sign up for a talk?
You should contact Stephen Spector, who has been handling
Brian Schott wrote:
Or blueprints.
I'll publicize it a bit more in the following days (when I get to
confirm it with the newly-elected PTLs), but for the summit the proposed
process is:
http://wiki.openstack.org/Summit
Cheers,
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
Release Manager, OpenStack
One day left, and still 15 to go!
https://code.launchpad.net/~jaypipes/glance/checksum/+merge/54537
https://code.launchpad.net/~sandy-walsh/nova/zones3/+merge/52565
https://code.launchpad.net/~openstack-gd/nova/libvirt-multinic-nova/+merge/54589
If we were to go with UUIDs and using XenServer, I should be able to use
the uuid that it generates upon VM creation. I would almost ask your above
question for XenServer then. When I terminate and launch an VM on the same
machine, I should be able to give it the same uuid that I was just
It's early here, but I think it's closer to 200 zones? :)
On Mar 24, 2011, at 5:16 AM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote:
On Mar 23, 2011, at 9:41 PM, Justin Santa Barbara wrote:
The type of a server @id in CloudServers is xsd:int, which is a 32-bit
signed integer:
On Mar 24, 2011, at 11:54 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Well said, Vish. A few comments inline below. The parts I snipped out
were the ones I entirely agree with or had no comments on...
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
OpenStack Project Integration
All, consider me as a nova core dev. Seems we could use a few more and I
need an excuse to spend more time reviewing code :)
Thanks,
-tr3buchet
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message (including any attached or
embedded documents) is intended for the exclusive and confidential use of the
Your reviews have been very thorough for FF.
+1
On 3/24/11 4:58 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Trey Morris trey.mor...@rackspace.com
wrote:
All, consider me as a nova core dev. Seems we could use a few more and I
need an excuse to spend
+1
On 03/24/2011 02:40 PM, Trey Morris wrote:
All, consider me as a nova core dev. Seems we could use a few more and I
need an excuse to spend more time reviewing code :)
Thanks,
-tr3buchet
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message (including any attached or
embedded documents) is
I don't have anything for the agenda -- happy to skip it.
Ewan.
-Original Message-
From: openstack-poc-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-poc-
bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Bryce
Sent: 24 March 2011 14:59
I am OK with whatever the group decides.
John
-Original Message-
From: openstack-poc-bounces+john=openstack@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-poc-bounces+john=openstack@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Ewan Mellor
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 10:01 AM
To: Jonathan Bryce;
All right...in the absence of any strong votes to do it and several to skip,
we'll skip this week. And I will get the calendar/reminders set up that we
talked about last week. Thanks,
Jonathan.
On Mar 24, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Joshua McKenty wrote:
Ill be running to the airport, so skipping it
14 matches
Mail list logo
