Re: [Openstack] Large Files in swift and ConnectionTimeout

2011-11-02 Thread gaurav gangalwar
Hi, I faced the simillar issue, but it was hitting node timeout in my case, it started working fine after increasing node_timeout value in my case. Have you tried with increased conn_timeout value in proxy-server.conf? Regards, Gaurav On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Sharif Islam wrote: > -B

[Openstack] Swift ACL can't work in RHEL6.1

2011-11-02 Thread Li Hua
Hi Folks, I set up a SAIO test environment in RHEL6.1 using openstack-swift-1.4.3-b447.noarch from http://yum.griddynamics.net/yum/diablo-centos/ . I want to test the container Read/Write access permission using the following steps. Creating a container with read access permission for anyone. [

Re: [Openstack] stable/diablo issue

2011-11-02 Thread James E. Blair
Nati Ueno writes: > Hi folks > > stable/diablo nova didn't pass pep8 now. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/885540 > > - Can we have pep8 check automatically for diablo/stable? > - How about unit-testing on merge props for diablo/stable? > - Can we have Jenkins task for diablo/stable ? Hi,

Re: [Openstack] stable/diablo issue

2011-11-02 Thread Nati Ueno
Thanks Jim! I got it. Cheers Nati 2011/11/2 James E. Blair : > Nati Ueno writes: > >> Hi folks >> >> stable/diablo  nova didn't pass pep8 now. >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/885540 >> >> - Can we have pep8 check automatically for diablo/stable? >> - How about unit-testing on merge props

[Openstack] stable/diablo issue

2011-11-02 Thread Nati Ueno
Hi folks stable/diablo nova didn't pass pep8 now. https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/885540 - Can we have pep8 check automatically for diablo/stable? - How about unit-testing on merge props for diablo/stable? - Can we have Jenkins task for diablo/stable ? Cheers Nati

[Openstack] Large Files in swift and ConnectionTimeout

2011-11-02 Thread Sharif Islam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anyone tested swift with large files (> 200GB)? I tried to upload a 130GB file: using segments: -S 4147483648 newcontainer file130G.tmp file130G.tmp segment 1 file130G.tmp segment 9 file130G.tmp segment 3 file130G.tmp segment 6 file130G.tmp segment

Re: [Openstack] Submitting code to Novaclient

2011-11-02 Thread Gaurav Gupta
@Sandy: Thanks @Monty: I second that. On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > Speaking of ... it's probably about time to get this folded in to the > regular infrastructure, since it's pretty important to the project. > Shall we set up a time to move it to the openstack org on gi

Re: [Openstack] Submitting code to Novaclient

2011-11-02 Thread Sandy Walsh
Since it was required for zone communications, the plan at the summit was to roll it into Nova under the ./contrib directory (and keep it lock-step with trunk). We could still push it to PyPi as needed. Is this no longer the case? -S From: openstack-bou

Re: [Openstack] Submitting code to Novaclient

2011-11-02 Thread Monty Taylor
Speaking of ... it's probably about time to get this folded in to the regular infrastructure, since it's pretty important to the project. Shall we set up a time to move it to the openstack org on github and add it to gerrit/jenkins? On 11/02/2011 12:23 PM, Sandy Walsh wrote: > You're doing it righ

Re: [Openstack] Submitting code to Novaclient

2011-11-02 Thread Sandy Walsh
You're doing it right, we've all just been tied up with some production stuff. I'll try and take some time this afternoon to clear the queue. Sorry for the delay ... and thanks for the submissions! -S From: openstack-bounces+sandy.walsh=rackspace@lists.launc

[Openstack] Submitting code to Novaclient

2011-11-02 Thread Gaurav Gupta
What's the process of submitting code to the novaclient project. Is it submitting pull request from Git or something like Gerrit? There are many pulls for novaclient that are waiting on GitHub for weeks. If someone get a change, please review and merge the following: https://github.com/rackspace/p

Re: [Openstack] Cannot boot from volume with 2 devices

2011-11-02 Thread Gaurav Gupta
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Scott Moser wrote: > On Tue, 1 Nov 2011, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: > > > Sounds like we can work around this pretty easily by sorting the disks > before we pass them into the xml template. > > The long term solution here is not to load the kernel and the ramdisk >