All:
I'm working on documenting the actions in the variously policy.json files. I
just posted a WIP branch here: https://review.openstack.org/8347
Can I get some feedback on whether this is a reasonable structure for
documenting all of these options? It renders OK in HTML, but currently it
Really awesome stuff, thank you guys!
John Postlethwait
Nebula, Inc.
206-999-4492
On Thursday, June 7, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
Hey guys!
We just upgraded to a new version of gerrit. This is based on the new
upstream version 2.4, but in addition we've landed two additional
Fantastic.Aye to the holy "Rebase change" feature
Nuage Co - Razique Mahrouarazique.mahr...@gmail.com
Le 8 juin 2012 à 09:46, John Postlethwait a écrit :
Really awesome stuff, thank you guys!John PostlethwaitNebula, Inc.206-999-4492On Thursday, June 7, 2012
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
Hey guys!
We just upgraded to a new version of gerrit. This is based on the new
upstream version 2.4, but in addition we've landed two additional
features on top of that - so there's tons of new toys to play with.
Hi all,
I'm new to openstack. I was going through the RPC python code and saw
that it is not using the AMQP specific reply-to framework for sending rpc
responses to auto-delete temporary reply queues. Instead, the message
property called 'msg_id' is used as the reply queue. This makes it
On Wed, Jun 06 2012, Julien Danjou wrote:
Hi,
The metering project team holds a meeting in #openstack-meeting,
Thursdays at 1600 UTC
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=16min=0sec=0.
Everyone is welcome.
http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda
Topic:
Thank for this
Igor Laskovy
Kiev, Ukraine
On Jun 8, 2012 11:20 AM, Fredric Morenius fredric.moren...@ericsson.com
wrote:
Hello All,
An update on the use of the qemu-nbd/kpartx based solution to inject files
into VM images:
After some more testing it has turned out that injection into the
On 06/08/2012 09:20 AM, Fredric Morenius wrote:
Hello All,
An update on the use of the qemu-nbd/kpartx based solution to inject files
into VM images:
After some more testing it has turned out that injection into the UEC version
of CirrOS (this:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:19:47AM +0200, Christian Wittwer wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I'd file a bug against libvirt in Oneiric, requesting that they
backport the 4 changesets mentioned in
Do you know if that bug is now fixed in Oneiric?
No idea I'm afraid, I only maintain libvirt upstream or
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Remember to set some time aside tomorrow to participate to our big
BugTriage day !
It's over now, a quick overview of the results of the day:
http://fnords.wordpress.com/2012/06/08/bug-triage-day-results/
Congrats to all participants ! See you all for our next BugDay...
nova list and other nova * commands work by making http (or https)
connections to your api node. Any node that has network access to it can make
calls just fine as long as you've got the right environment variables set,
which include: NOVA_URL, NOVA_PROJECT_ID, NOVA_USERNAME etc.
nova-manage
The weakness of all of our current async calls (e.g. nova boot) is that there
is no route to get the details of what failed... when my sever comes up in
'error', I'd really like to know why... is it a system error? Broken image?
Temporary glitch? There doesn't seem to be a channel for this kind
Hi Stackers,
I'm working now with a Multi-Node Architecture which is working partially
with Essex - Quantum - OVS. My VMs have now the network but I did some
hacks for that and I need more help.
Can you have a look to my questions ?
https://answers.launchpad.net/quantum/+question/199823
Thank
Hi-
I have installed openstack on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. with KVM. with respect to
the guidelines mentioned in the admin/starter guides.
But, then when trying to find any support on how to go with the LXC, I find
very minimal/no support.
Can any one there who had already got LXC working can kindly
Hi Mandar-
True said, The processor has no Hardware virtualization support. I have
upgraded the machine and now able to manage KVM based VM's from Openstack.
Thanks a lot for the help and guidance.
--
Trinath S
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Vaze, Mandar mandar.v...@nttdata.comwrote:
**Ø
Marco Consonni wrote:
When I submit a bug, I would like to specify the version of the software
I'm using.
To me, this would be very useful in particular for the person who's
going to fix it because s/he can reject the bug (giving indications why)
if it has already fixed in the latest version.
Instance faults gets populated when there's an error - most details are
only visible to admins to prevent too much information about the network
from leaking - but if its something a user can fix, the details are
displayed. For example, setting a password that is too weak for a windows
box, or
Hi everyone,
apologies for the cross-post, and not sure if this is new information.
I did do a cursory check of both list archives and didn't find
anything pertinent, so here goes. Feel free to point me to an existing
thread if I'm merely regurgitating something that's already known.
Either I'm
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 06/08/2012 09:20 AM, Fredric Morenius wrote:
Hello All,
An update on the use of the qemu-nbd/kpartx based solution to inject files
into VM images:
After some more testing it has turned out that injection into the UEC
version of CirrOS
Hi Florian,
There's an Ubuntu bug already:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/981130
librgw was not complete, and wasn't actually used by radosgw, so it was
dropped. The Ubuntu package just needs to be updated to remove the
dependency and rgw.py, like upstream did.
Josh
On
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Scott Moser wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 06/08/2012 09:20 AM, Fredric Morenius wrote:
Hello All,
An update on the use of the qemu-nbd/kpartx based solution to inject
files into VM images:
After some more testing it has turned out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Josh
On 08/06/12 16:48, Josh Durgin wrote:
There's an Ubuntu bug already:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/981130
librgw was not complete, and wasn't actually used by radosgw, so it
was dropped. The Ubuntu package just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Trinath
On 08/06/12 12:44, Trinath Somanchi wrote:
Hi-
I have installed openstack on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. with KVM. with
respect to the guidelines mentioned in the admin/starter guides.
But, then when trying to find any support on how to go
On 06/08/2012 04:35 PM, Scott Moser wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 06/08/2012 09:20 AM, Fredric Morenius wrote:
Hello All,
An update on the use of the qemu-nbd/kpartx based solution to inject files
into VM images:
After some more testing it has turned out that
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Josh Durgin josh.dur...@inktank.com wrote:
Hi Florian,
There's an Ubuntu bug already:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/981130
librgw was not complete, and wasn't actually used by radosgw, so it was
dropped. The Ubuntu package just needs to
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:59 PM, James Page james.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Josh
On 08/06/12 16:48, Josh Durgin wrote:
There's an Ubuntu bug already:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/981130
librgw was not complete, and
Hello,
Following up on yesterday's meeting, I have started a first version of a
google spreadsheet to estimate volume of events generated by ceilometer [1].
Comments and suggestions for improvement are of course welcome.
[1]
On 06/08/2012 01:05 AM, vishnu attur wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to openstack. I was going through the RPC python code and saw
that it is not using the AMQP specific reply-to framework for sending
rpc responses to auto-delete temporary reply queues. Instead, the
message property called 'msg_id'
OpenStack Community Newsletter — June 8
Highlights of the week
The results of Bug Triage Day are in
http://fnords.wordpress.com/2012/06/08/bug-triage-day-results/
Nova has more bugs than all the other core projects combined, and the
most slack to clean up. We went from
Hi guys,
Have anyone had this issue? I'm having the same issue, but can't resolve it
yet.
https://answers.launchpad.net/nova/+question/198681
Instances can ping each other with local IP addresses, but they can't ping
each other with associated floating IP addresses. Communication with
outside is
+2 … Synchronous calls out to a separate service (glance-api) which then makes
a synchronous call to a different service (glance-registry) all within a
service serving a synchronous call (nova-api) makes the world slow.
On Jun 7, 2012, at 10:00 PM, Gabe Westmaas wrote:
Hey all,
I was
tl;dr - Should we compare roles as case-sensitive or case-insensitive? I vote
case-sensitive.
This bug was recently filed in Glance:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1010519. It points out that Nova and
Keystone are both case-insensitive when it comes to role comparison, yet Glance
*is*
I'd vote case-sensitive.
Joseph
(w) 703-248-6160
(c) 571-340-2434
(f) 703-812-3712
3811 N. Fairfax Drive Suite 200
Arlington, VA, 22203, USA
http://www.east.isi.edu/~jsuh
- Original Message -
From: Brian Waldon brian.wal...@rackspace.com
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Hi Sandy and Jay,
I've checked in one graphviz VM state transition in this review patch 3:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/8254/
However since it's very complicated, the graph is too big after it's
rendered. Ideas are welcome. Thanks,
Yun
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Jay Pipes
I vote for case-sensitive too.
PS: The keystone middleware to swift is case sensitive to roles as well.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Joseph Suh j...@isi.edu wrote:
I'd vote case-sensitive.
Joseph
(w) 703-248-6160
(c) 571-340-2434
(f) 703-812-3712
3811 N. Fairfax Drive Suite 200
Explicit is better than implicit. Case-sensitive.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Brian Waldon brian.wal...@rackspace.com wrote:
tl;dr - Should we compare roles as case-sensitive or case-insensitive? I
vote case-sensitive.
This bug was recently filed in
Glance:
What's the argument for allowing both, for example, admin, Admin and
admIn roles?
This seems like one place where case insensitive makes the most sense.
Thanks,
Kiall
Sent from my phone.
On Jun 8, 2012 11:01 p.m., Joseph Suh j...@isi.edu wrote:
I'd vote case-sensitive.
Joseph
(w)
I'm suggesting we support only a single representation of a role across all
projects: 'admin', 'Admin', and 'admIn' would be three separate roles.
Are you suggesting otherwise?
On Jun 8, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Kiall Mac Innes wrote:
What's the argument for allowing both, for example, admin, Admin
No, I'm suggesting they should all be treated as a single role. I.e. roles
should be case insensitive.
Thanks,
Kiall
Sent from my phone.
On Jun 8, 2012 11:16 p.m., Brian Waldon brian.wal...@rackspace.com
wrote:
I'm suggesting we support only a single representation of a role across
all
Can you explain why?
On Jun 8, 2012, at 3:18 PM, Kiall Mac Innes wrote:
No, I'm suggesting they should all be treated as a single role. I.e. roles
should be case insensitive.
Thanks,
Kiall
Sent from my phone.
On Jun 8, 2012 11:16 p.m., Brian Waldon brian.wal...@rackspace.com wrote:
I guess I'm looking at this from more of a purist development point of view:
'Admin' and 'admin' just can't be equal. If I think of this as comparing roles,
where a role is an abstract concept, case-insensitivity makes more sense. A
string is simply being used to represent the role, where the
I'm going to be the counter opinion here, but I don't really see a benefit in
the case-sensitivity from a user perspective… Will a user ever want a scenario
where they have/can have an Admin and an admin role (and maybe even an
adMIN role)?
I could certainly be missing a lot of context here,
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012, Brian Waldon brian.wal...@rackspace.com wrote:
Can you explain why?
Not to speak for Kiall, but I'll make the argument that there is no
value in treating admin, Admin, and admIn separately. It can only
lead to confusion and frustration of the people who use OpenStack.
case-insensitive - why would 'Admin' and 'admin' be different? Sure, a role is represented by a string, but why does that string need to be case sensitive?I'd think that if you had distinct roles attributed to 'Admin' and 'admin' that that would lead to confusion.Cheers,Christopher FerrisIBM
I would actually like to see us downcase, (ASCII downcase, anyway), the role
names when they are created. Then we will not get into trouble when
interfacing with case-insensitive systems -- the question of case will never
come up.
Case sensitive comparisons are less code and run faster, so
Hi Joe/Dolph,
I have a few questions on the v3 API's create_user (sorry the comments section
in the Google docs is getting pretty cluttered now):
(POST) /users == create_user
{
tenant_id: ...
name: ...
password: ...
enabled: ...
email: ...
description: ...
}
1. Does this tenant_id
On Jun 8, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012, Brian Waldon brian.wal...@rackspace.com wrote:
Can you explain why?
Not to speak for Kiall, but I'll make the argument that there is no
value in treating admin, Admin, and admIn separately. It can only
lead to
+1 to downcasing
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Daly ti...@yahoo-inc.com
Sent: Friday, June 8, 2012 7:49pm
To: Johannes Erdfelt johan...@erdfelt.com
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Comparing roles - case (in)sensitivity
On
Role *names* are a human-interface element (arbitrarily defined by users for
organizational purposes) and humans would intuitively compare them with case
insensitivity (they're comparing organizational meaning, not strings)... if
we're going to bother comparing them in code, I'd prefer it to be
On Jun 8, 2012, at 6:47 PM, Nguyen, Liem Manh liem_m_ngu...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Joe/Dolph,
I have a few questions on the v3 API’s create_user (sorry the comments
section in the Google docs is getting pretty cluttered now):
(POST) /users == create_user
{
tenant_id: ...
name: ...
50 matches
Mail list logo
