01, 2013 5:14 AM
To: Dugger, Donald D; ch...@christopherbartels.com
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack in OpenStack Without a 'VT-x' CPU
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Dugger, Donald D
donald.d.dug...@intel.com wrote:
I don't claim to be an expert on OpenStack
I don't claim to be an expert on OpenStack on OpenStack but I don't believe you
need VTx at all. IPMI, yes you need that, but not VTx.
The idea behind OS on OS is that you are installing an image onto the bare
metal host, you are not utilizing the VTx features nor are you using KVM. You
need
[mailto:n.pal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 7:42 AM
To: Dugger, Donald D
Cc: openstack
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Plans for Trusted Computing in OpenStack
Hi,
so basically my questions/thoughts about support for TC in OpenStack are based
on a
somewhat different attack model where
The compute code currently defines a set of capabilities (info about disk
memory consumption, cpuinfo and a few other things) that are periodically
reported up to the scheduler. You can then use the extra_specs to specify
key/value pairs for a flavor that will be used by the scheduler's
Adam-
Completely random thought, do you have cookies enabled (I was able to propose a
topic with no problems).
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+donald.d.dugger=intel@lists.launchpad.net
PM
To: Patrick Petit
Cc: Dugger, Donald D; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
(openstack@lists.launchpad.net)
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Instance Type Extra Specs clarifications
Hello all,
I am part of the SF south bay meetup group and trying to add a Disk I/O QoS
feature which is based
with a new flavor that re-used an ID.
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
From: Vinay Bannai [mailto:vban...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 2:41 PM
To: Dugger, Donald D
Cc: Patrick Petit; Jiang, Yunhong; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
(openstack
Patrick-
We've enhanced `nova-manage' to manipulate the `extra_specs' entries, c.f.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/update-flavor-key-value, You can
add an `extra_specs' key/value pair to a flavor with the command:
nova-manage instance_type add_key m1.humongous
Suh [mailto:j...@isi.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 7:38 AM
To: Jiang, Yunhong
Cc: Dugger, Donald D; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: One question on the compute_filter
Yunhong,
Thanks for your interest in our patch. The original purpose of the
instance_type_extra_specs is providing
Message-
From: Joseph Suh [mailto:j...@isi.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 10:10 AM
To: Dugger, Donald D
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net; Jiang, Yunhong
Subject: Re: One question on the compute_filter
Don,
That's an interesting idea, but I am having a difficulty in understanding why
you
Joseph-
Tnx, we couldn't ask for more.
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Suh [mailto:j...@isi.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 10:49 AM
To: Dugger, Donald D
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net; Jiang, Yunhong
I have to agree with Daniel on this one. I frequently work on issues where
multiple people contribute to the code in a patch and therefore you wind up
with multiple Signed-off-by's. Yes, it's a little redundant when it's
exclusively your code but you need these tags when there are multiple
, March 29, 2012 4:57 PM
To: Dugger, Donald D; Sandy Walsh
Cc: Michael Pittaro (mik...@lahondaresearch.org);
nova-orchestrat...@lists.launchpad.net; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: RE: [Nova-orchestration] Thoughts on Orchestration (was Re:
Documentation on Caching)
Guys,
Sorry for missing
, Donald D;
nova-orchestrat...@lists.launchpad.net; openstack
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Orchestration meetings/futures
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
How about a big session on this at the folsom summit?
This is really a very important part and should
All-
The orchestration sub-group activity has dropped off since the start of the
year and we need to re-evaluate what should be done in this area. There are
still latency/serialization concerns that need to be addressed but people have
more immediate concerns that seem to be occupying
Still works for me.
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
-Original Message-
From: Sriram Subramanian [mailto:sri...@computenext.com]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 1:41 PM
To: Dugger, Donald D; nova-orchestrat...@lists.launchpad.net
Cc
I'd vote for having daemonize as an option at best. In a development
environment it's very nice to be able to kill all processes just by terminating
the `screen' ( or `tmux') session rather than having to kill all the daemons
individually. Plus it's nice to be able to see the current output
: 303/443-3786
From: Joshua Harlow [mailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 1:16 PM
To: Dugger, Donald D; Ghe Rivero
Cc: openstack
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Devstack (sh) and tmux
Doesn't stdout have a buffer also ;)
I'm all for options :-)
On 2/8/12 11:15 AM, Dugger, Donald
I'm having problems trying to follow the steps in Gerrit Workflow Quick
Reference (wiki.openstack.org/GerritWorkflow), in fact I'm failing on the first
step. When I try and get the list of available projects I'm getting the
failure:
Permission denied (publickey).
I've uploaded my
Nevermind. I'm not sure how I did it but by some magic incantation of
resetting login name/public key it's now working.
Sorry for the noise.
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
-Original Message-
From: Dugger, Donald D
Sent: Thursday
20 matches
Mail list logo