I've never seen that kernel panic before. If you're building on an NFS share
though, that often screws up the permissions. You could have root-squashing
turned on, and then every file that's supposed to be owned by root is owned by
an unprivileged user instead. It wouldn't surprise me that
.rst is ReStructured Text. It's the markup language being used.
Cheers,
Ewan.
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net]
On Behalf Of Andrew Bogott
Sent: Thursday,
2012, at 20:11, Ewan Mellor wrote:
I've never seen that kernel panic before. If you're building on an NFS share
though, that often screws up the permissions. You could have root-squashing
turned on, and then every file that's supposed to be owned by root is owned by
an unprivileged user
It looks like you're hitting a recently introduced bug (maybe). I haven't run
the code, but from reading through, it looks like the xenhost.host_data plugin
command is going to barf if it is not passed a host_uuid parameter. It used to
gracefully handle that case, but since 37a392dc it's not
,
Ewan.
From: John Garbutt
Sent: 26 March 2012 01:36
To: Ewan Mellor; Alexandre Leites; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: RE: [Openstack] [OpenStack] Xen Hypervisor
I certainly changed the plugin so it always required the host_uuid, but I also
changed the call_plugin code in xenapi_conn
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Goirand [mailto:tho...@goirand.fr]
Sent: 26 March 2012 13:56
To: John Garbutt
Cc: Ewan Mellor; Alexandre Leites; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack] Xen Hypervisor
On 03/26/2012 04:35 PM, John Garbutt wrote:
I
Lego and Jenga are both trademarks. I know why they would make good nicknames,
but please let's not go there.
Cinder FTW.
Ewan.
On Apr 19, 2012, at 8:10 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:53 PM, john.griffi...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have
Yes. See http://wiki.openstack.org/XenServer/XenXCPAndXenServer.
Cheers,
Ewan.
From: openstack-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf
Of livemoon
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 6:49 AM
To:
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net]
On Behalf Of Dan Prince
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:31 AM
To: openstack
Subject: [Openstack] SmokeStack: xenserver tests
Anyone who is using OpenStack with MySQL / MariaDB, please see this _extremely_
dangerous security vulnerability, announced on Saturday:
https://community.rapid7.com/community/metasploit/blog/2012/06/11/cve-2012-2122-a-tragically-comedic-security-flaw-in-mysql
Ewan.
Goddamn it. I've just entered the channel at 21:00 UTC on the dot. I
obviously missed the time change. What did I miss?
And are we sticking with 20:00 UTC from now on? In particular, US clocks move
this weekend for DST.
Ewan.
-Original Message-
From:
I don't have anything for the agenda -- happy to skip it.
Ewan.
-Original Message-
From: openstack-poc-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-poc-
bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Bryce
Sent: 24 March 2011 14:59
Fine by me.
Thanks,
Ewan.
-Original Message-
From: openstack-poc-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-poc-
bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Bryce
Sent: 07 April 2011 19:47
To:
I think that we should separate these two concerns. Vulnerability
management should be in strict confidence until the appropriate fixes are
known and hotfixes are ready. The other security champion work should
be vocal and publicly visible. I think that it only confuses things to
overlap these
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:28 AM
To: Paul Voccio
Cc: Ewan Mellor; openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack-poc] API compatibility
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Paul Voccio
openst
I've added a minor rant to that Etherpad. Other than that, I just desperately
want us to get to a point that we're happy declaring Diablo's APIs as
supported, stable, and future-compatible.
Ewan.
From: openstack-poc-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net
Following on from the IRC discussion today: I agree with Josh that an events
committee is a good idea. That way, we can discuss registration rules broadly,
because obviously a lot of people want to have input.
This is particularly true if Thierry doesn't actually want to organize
I'd like to see a list of global bug day events, and who's going to be online
when, so that we can publicize widely. It would be great to be able to say
something like:
o Monty Taylor, CI and QA expert, will be on-site at HP in Austin and online
between 11am and 5pm Central.
o Vish
Having raised the subject of the global hack-in day for discussion by the PPB
today, I've realised that I can't actually make the meeting. My apologies.
I've cc'd Renuka and Vijay. Between them, one will attend the IRC meeting
today (noon our time). They'll be able to discuss any details of
Done, thanks for the suggestion, Monsyne.
Ewan.
-Original Message-
From: openstack-xenapi-
bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:openstack-
xenapi-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Monsyne Dragon
Sent: 31 January 2011 23:49
To:
Just for summary, the advantages of having the streaming inside a domU are:
1. You move the network receive and the image decompression / decryption
(if you're using that) off dom0's CPU and onto the domU's. Dom0 CPU is a
scarce resource, even in the new release of XenServer with 4 CPUs
What is the plan for CLI tools that use the OpenStack API? I see novatools on
github. Is that something that we're taking forward? And if so, will they be
moving to Launchpad? If not, what's the alternative?
Thanks,
Ewan.
___
Mailing list:
Yes, fine by me. This is the convention that I normally use, but I don’t think
that I have mentioned that to other people, so we might not all be sticking to
this.
I do use _rec for a record, if I feel that it needs distinguishing explicitly.
I’d prefer that we allowed vm or vm_rec for a
-Original Message-
From: Ed Leafe [mailto:ed.le...@rackspace.com]
Sent: 07 March 2011 16:28
To: Ewan Mellor
Cc: Chris Behrens; Rick Harris; openstack-xenapi@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack-xenapi] XenAPI virt-layer Variable Naming-
Scheme
On Mar 6, 2011, at 8:29 AM
101 - 124 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
