Hello,
I'm trying to get started with Tempest and I would really like to be
able to see a running setup somewhere. I'm getting a lot of tests
failing and I don't know if it's because of my setup or because of bugs
in Tempest or incompatibilities with the current code in the other
components.
On 02/22/2012 07:17 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 02/22/2012 10:49 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
Indeed, as soon as someone says I have Tempest working on a system
configured by devstack with a repeatable process, here's how I did
it... we'll start running it in Jenkins. But so far I've heard from
the
On 02/22/2012 07:17 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 02/22/2012 10:49 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
Indeed, as soon as someone says I have Tempest working on a system
configured by devstack with a repeatable process, here's how I did
it... we'll start running it in Jenkins. But so far I've heard from
the
On 02/27/2012 05:13 PM, Daryl Walleck wrote:
I'm actively looking into any issues. I have all these tests passing locally in
my environment, so the issues seem to be focused around people using devstack.
I've made some merge prop's that will take care of a few of the issues. One
issue that
I recently submitted a few fixes to the test suite in various components
of openstack. These fixes are being merged in master, but the code
remains broken in the stable/essex branch. Review requests for
stable/essex either get rejected or stuck in limbo because it seems that
people don't know
Hi Mark, thanks for your answer.
On 05/03/2012 10:25 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 14:37 +0200, Ionuț Arțăriși wrote:
I recently submitted a few fixes to the test suite in various components
of openstack.
Thanks for that!
These fixes are being merged in master
On 05/09/2012 05:45 AM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
I ran .unittests on a box with python-webob-1.2b3 and it throws left
and right: errors=72, failures=6. I'm wondering if anyone is working
on adapting Swift for WebOb 1.2 and if a patch is available somewhere.
I see Ionut fixed lp:984042, but clearly it
On 07/17/2012 11:33 PM, Joseph Heck wrote:
That's the general area I was going to head with the Active Directory backend
I'm hacking on. Chris Hoge of UOregon presented today (@ OSCON) on a local
keystone hack that they did to enable LDAP AuthN + a fail back to SQL based
system for their
Hi!
I've been working on a solution for rate-limiting requests to keystone.
I based this on the existing turnstile [0] and nova_limits [1] projects
by Kevin L. Mitchell. The project is basically a refactoring of
nova_limits to work with keystone so I've named it keystone_limits:
9 matches
Mail list logo