I would recommend keeping a clear separation of administrative APIs from
user APIs. Some policy restrictions in environments require them. EX:
FISMA
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
> Alternatively, if anyone would like to tar and feather me for picking port
> 5000 in the f
This is continuity on a thread I was having with Scott Moser about his
blueprint on config drive improvements:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/config-drive-v2
I had suggested adding the current keystone API url path ( from flags ) to
metadata api response.
The fundamental logic on my
https://github.com/cloudscaling/tarkin
This is a very minimal test set that supports pinging vms after launching
them.
Nothing crazy.
-Matt
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 06/14/2012 05:26 AM, Neelakantam Gaddam wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Recently I came across the tool
I believe swift CAN be used as a block device via FUSE, and I believe it
has been done before. I wouldn't recommend it though.
-Matt
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Sebastien, you are correct.
>
> Udit, you will need to provide a bit more information on what you are
> looki
You may be better off considering a different approach all together.
We ran into similar issues involving FISMA constraints and data
classification in the past. One
'simple' solution is complete segregation ( not to be confused with
isolation ). What we ended up coming up with was to basically d
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> 2012/5/30 Matt Joyce :
> > Secondly, while LXC does provide a lot of native access, it still does
> > paging management internally just as kvm does. So direct memory
> management
> > ( some HPC users like this ) bec
ute to try to avoid wasting all
> of that by putting a hypervisor on top.
>
> - Michael Chapman
>
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Matt Joyce
> wrote:
>
>> We did some considerable HPC testing when I worked over at NASA Ames with
>> the Nebula project. So
+1 Simple. And works for most other projects well enough.
-Matt
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> James E. Blair wrote:
> > I believe we should at least have the common set of three mailing lists
> > (announce, user/operator, dev) and have a web page that lists them.
>
>
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CloudInit
Might want to check this little beastie out. Folks using kvm seem to end
up here for certain use cases.
-Matt
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Nicolae Paladi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for more information about file injection support in Open
Do we want a history of deltas or just last delta and leave the history to
UI implementers?
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 05:42 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > IIRC, the meters discussed in the wiki [1] are supposed to show "delta"
> values (usage since the la
I love graphviz as a charting tool and sphinx support inline is great.
Used to use it all the time at nebula in the work wiki.
-Matt
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 05/24/2012 10:46 AM, Yun Mao wrote:
>
>> Sandy,
>>
>> I like the suggestion of graphvis, although I haven'
First rule of security group. Do not talk about security group.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Rogerio Goncalves wrote:
> Maybe you missed the rules of security group?
>
> Rogério Gonçalves
> roge...@gmail.com
> Cel: (11) 8840-9790
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Leander Bessa Be
s/APT/API/
s/of/or/
Please forgive spelling errors. On a train atm.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Matt Joyce wrote:
> We did some considerable HPC testing when I worked over at NASA Ames with
> the Nebula project. So I think we may have been the first to try out
> openstack
es of nehalems. We had
no means to do that at the time.
Scheduling full instances is somewhat easier so long as all the nodes in
your zone are full instance use only.
Matt Joyce
Now at Cloudscaling
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:49 AM, John Paul Walters wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Ma
libvirt can pull hard cpu stats. which can be useful. for instance it can
pick out the cpu generation names.
-matt
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:35 PM, James R Penick wrote:
>
>> >>-> In addition to a signature, I think we would need a se
My point of concern.
\
If an agent is being built into the compute nodes, that would best be a
split out project.
Two major reasons. First and foremost sub projects should not be spinning
up their own agents. Secondly, there is a use case of agents outside of
metering.
If an agent is to be buil
I actually just use a devstack install inside of a vm and do a full
setup.py install with all the dependencies. Then if I need to i rebuild or
rebuild the vm.
I shell scripted some direct to libvirt stuff to make it just fire up at
will from scratch if needed or just restart the vm.
-Matt
On W
well like every time we make an api query in the shell we get a return
result from the query. how are we handling those return results and
evaluating codes etc?
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Matt Joyce
> wrote:
>
How are we doing event handling in the client? Is there a blueprint on
this somewhere?
-Matt
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : http
>> I skipped out on blue printing and just submitted a gerrit review for
>> adding argparse flags for specifying URL for specific APIs.
>
> Why is this needed? These URLs come from the service catalog. Cases
> where you do need to override that use --os-url as part of token flow
> auth, skipping
I skipped out on blue printing and just submitted a gerrit review for
adding argparse flags for specifying URL for specific APIs.
Is that cool or do we want blue prints at that level of low complexity?
-Matt
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:18 AM,
Good to have options.
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
>> I disagree pretty strongly with the idea of an admin binary.
>
> I think many of us do; I (and I believe Doug) were simply preferring
> 1) a si
Whatever. stack.sh is a conflict. So probably better.
On May 2, 2012 11:20 AM, "Doug Hellmann"
wrote:
> Oops, I saw the code change before this message and I went ahead and
> approved it.
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
>
>> There has been a little more activity in the
gt;>>
>>> There are a couple of ways to handle that:
>>>
>>> 1. A separate "openstackadmin" CLI that looks for commands using a
>>> different plugin namespace, and therefore only loads the admin commands.
>>>
>>> 2. Prefix admin-r
;> different plugin namespace, and therefore only loads the admin commands.
>>
>> 2. Prefix admin-related commands in the unified cli with "admin" (so
>> "openstack admin create network" or whatever).
>>
>> 3. Separate admin apps for each project.
>
wrote:
> I borrowed Guido's time machine and added an interactive mode to cliff this
> weekend.
>
> http://cliff.readthedocs.org/en/latest/index.html
>
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
>>
>> Question do we want to consider an interactiv
" or whatever).
>
> 3. Separate admin apps for each project.
>
> I think we should avoid 3, since that goes against the spirit of this
> project. I like #2, but #1 would be easy to implement and could share 99% of
> the code from the basic openstackclient.
>
> On Tue, Ma
Question do we want to consider an interactive mode on the CLI? Or is
the shell enough for our use case?
Maybe just ignore that question until we've got something beyond the basics.
-Matt
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
> Awesome. will do.
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2
Awesome. will do.
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
> I have started creating blueprints from my notes about activities we need to
> complete for the unified CLI. Please check the list
> at https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-openstackclient/ and make sure I
> haven't misse
> As far as whether we support admin-only commands, I think we should.
> If they have their own client libs then we'll split them up too. I
> actually kind of liked the side effect of the old nova-manage in that
> it was self-enforcing for admin-ness since you needed to run it on the
> node itself
How does this blueprint play into this client. Is it a separate admin
only client or just a subset of this guy?
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/admin-cli
-matt
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> As of my rece
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Doug Hellmann (doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com) wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Doug Hellmann
>> > wrote:
>> > > Do we need to specify this beyond saying that all subcommands mus
>
> 2. I think it would be good if the HIG gave guidelines on how the
> command should behave when run with no arguments.
I think the marines call this sort of thing, Task Condition and
Standard. Not sure how useful it would be.
> 3. I think it would be good if the HIG recommended that, at
Makes sense to me.
On Apr 27, 2012 2:27 PM, "Everett Toews" wrote:
> I like this idea but what happens to the openstack-operators list in this
> scenario?
>
> I don't think we'd want to have the openstack and openstack-operators list
> going along in parallel since it sounds like they would overl
e are still exploits (hardware RAM taps?), and we rely on a
> total code audit, but we can raise the bar a long way.
>
> Anyone from Intel / familiar with Intel's trusted cloud work want to explain
> better than I can?
>
> Justin
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at
at 9:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 09:05:41AM -0700, Matt Joyce wrote:
>> From a security stand point I am curious what you see the benefit as?
>
> Consider that you might have separate people in your data center
> managing the virtualization hosts,
>From a security stand point I am curious what you see the benefit as?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Michael Grosser
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm following the openstack development for some time now and I was
> wondering if there was a solution to spin up encrypted virtual machines by
> default and
Monitoring and billing seem to be two VERY different beasts.
Should we be separating the two efforts?
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Brian Schott
wrote:
> The heart of nova-biling is built around accounts, resources, billing
> segments with a tariff and cost. Not clear at my first review wher
Correct me if I am wrong but mongo has not been used in openstack
previously? What is the benefit here that justifies bringing in new
technology?
Also are you planning an active polling process over AMPQ or passive
listening for the monitor?
It seems to me that most of the main components today
I've done libvirt calls via nrpe in the past for this.
On Apr 20, 2012 5:28 AM, "Leander Bessa" wrote:
> I've been trying to complete the diagnostics command for libvirt, so far i
> think i can get the cpu usage (still need a sample time of 1 second),
> volume and network io. I still can't get t
I'd be down with helping out as well.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
>>
>> We had a good discussion about a unified OpenStack command line client
>> on Monday at the Design Summit. The notes are in the Etherpad at
Reminds me of the Opsware Global Shell. That was built on a FUSE fs
interface to the API. I loved it when I worked on it.
-Matt
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> We had a good discussion about a unified OpenStack command line client
> on Monday at the Design Summit. The n
t would be kind of a cool project to
deploy a scalable streaming system for a conference like this and plug
it into an openstack scalable infrastructure.
-Matt
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
>> I'
I'm willing to help with setting up a 2.0 solution. =D Let us know
what we can do to help for next time.
I think this webex stuff has been useful for more than a few folks
from what i've seen on IRC.
-Matt
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I caught up wit
http://wiki.openstack.org/FolsomSummitEtherpads
All the etherpads
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Stefano Maffulli
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 23:13 -0400, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
>>> The following channels have been created on
Problem of course is many operators aren't on the design summit
contributor list ( ala don't have codes to get into it ) and if it's
later it's 500 USD to attend.
Maybe not the best means of collaborating on something that effects them deeply.
Pondering that.
-Matt
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:43
101 - 146 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
