Or even better, just continue to call it openstack networking. The code
names only serve to confuse the uninitiated. They needlessly steepen the
learning curve and slow uptake.
On May 11, 2013 3:59 PM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
Lattice
-- dims
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 3:52 PM,
As a user, this seems odd to me. Am I correct in understanding that this is
a push to create an Openstack-oriented specialized message bus? Are none of
the many, many available, battle-hardened messaging systems suitable?
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:35 AM, heut2008 heut2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm suddenly having the same problem on a fresh install from cloud archives
on 12.04. I tried setting token_format=UUID explicitly in keystone.conf
because I had seen related bugs there, but no luck.
Thanks,
Asher
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Raja Gajju gajjur...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi
+1
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/28/2012 08:19 PM, David Kang wrote:
I agree that subject prefix is a way.
There are pros and cons of either approach.
However, when I asked a few of the people who showed interest in
bare-metal
+1 for both of these use cases
On Oct 24, 2012 5:06 PM, Dan Dyer dan.dye...@gmail.com wrote:
Based on a discussion with Doug at the Summit, I would like to propose a
couple of new use cases for Ceilometer. As background, up until now, the
usage data that Ceilometer collects could be
Hi,
This is great stuff. This is a nicely distilled version of the official
docs for anyone looking for a quick outline, and this includes quantum
rather than nova-net. Thanks much - just what I've been after.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Skible OpenStack
skible.openst...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like you have an error in an endpoint internalURL. Do a 'keystone
endpoint-list' and make sure that the url stings look good. It appears
you've made a typo tenand_id - tenant_id.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Daniel Oliveira dvalbr...@gmail.com wrote:
When I try to glance index, I
Hi,
It looks like user-role-list is a recently added command in keystone (
launchpad https://answers.launchpad.net/keystone/+question/190656).
When I run it on a new keystone install in Ubuntu 12.04 I get:
keystone --token mytoken --endpoint
http://192.168.1.11:35357/v2.0user-role-list
://bugs.launchpad.net/python-keystoneclient/+bug/1058750
Use that link to subscribe to the bug if you want to track it's progress.
-joe
On Sep 29, 2012, at 5:35 AM, Asher Newcomer asher...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like user-role-list is a recently added command in keystone (
launchpad https
Hi,
I'm sure I've made a simple error, but I'm momentarily stuck trying to work
through a Folsom install on a fresh Ubuntu 12.04 box. I've stepped through
the process for installing the identity service described here:
Hi All,
I'm curious, and I know that no one can give a definitive answer, but can
anyone provide a ballpark expectation on when we can expect to see Folsom
packages in 'official' Linux distros? How long does that process tend to
take after release?
Thanks!
Asher
To chime in as a lurker around here, this sounds good, but why add the
security list? It seems like security specific topics would interest those
subscribed to the general list as well.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Kevin Jackson ke...@linuxservices.co.ukwrote:
My two penneth worth:
I'd be
12 matches
Mail list logo
