[Openstack] Use of XML xi:include with xpointer

2013-07-28 Thread Sean Roberts
I'm working on reusing content from remote XML formatted sources to create new 
content. Using the editor oxygen I can see the remote content, so I know my 
href is valid. But maven fails to build the html returning bad pointer. 
The remote content isn't using DTD or XMLschema. I'm hoping I can figure out 
how to walk the structure without having to. 
Any XML peoples that can help?

~sean
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack Marketing] New code name for networks

2013-05-11 Thread Sean Roberts
Octopus

~sean

On May 11, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Jason Smith jason.sm...@rackspace.com wrote:

 Hello,
 I understand why we had to give up Quantum code name but rather than just 
 refer to it as networking let's come up with a new code name!
 
 Thoughts?
 
 Thanks,
 -js
 ___
 Marketing mailing list
 market...@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/marketing

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] Announcing Climate, OpenStack Capacity Leasing project

2013-03-30 Thread Sean Roberts
Interested. Will post. Cheer!

~sean

On Mar 25, 2013, at 9:49 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:

 Hi there,
 
 I'd like to announce a new project named Climate.
 
 The project
 aims to provide a capacity leasing service inside OpenStack
 cloud platforms,
 via the reservation of various resources in a calendar
 based view.
 
 The
 project is still as its early draft stage, but anyone with ideas
 and
 interest is welcome!
 
 Homepage:
 https://launchpad.net/climate
 
 Cheers,
 --
 Julien Danjou
 ;; Free Software
 hacker ; freelance consultant
 ;; http://julien.danjou.info
 
 
 ATT1.bin
 ATT2.txt

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] user committee points to review

2013-01-16 Thread Sean Roberts
That worked, I can read it now.

~sean

On Jan 16, 2013, at 6:18 AM, Tim Bell 
tim.b...@cern.chmailto:tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:


A few of you have had trouble reading the document. The updated link is at 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yD8TfqUik2dt5xo_jMVHMl7tw9oIJnEndLK8YqEToyo/edit

If you can’t read it, please send me a note and I’ll share it.

Tim

From: Tim Bell
Sent: 09 January 2013 09:52
To: 'Sean Roberts'; OpenStack community; openstack
Subject: RE: Calling all user group and meetup organizers


Sean,

Is the aim to provide co-ordination for the OpenStack user groups worldwide ?

Ryan, JC and I have been putting together the structure for the OpenStack user 
committee (as described on the foundation list at 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/2012-December/001289.html). As 
we have collected input from various parties, there is a proposal for part of 
the committee to consist of user group representatives from different 
geographies.

As mentioned in the mail to the foundation list, anyone who’d like to 
contribute to the user committee structure/mandate is welcome to get in touch 
for editing rights to 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yD8TfqUik2dt5xo_jMVHMl7tw9oIJnEndLK8YqEToyo

I am on travel on the 15th so I won’t be able to attend the call but it would 
be great if the conclusions could be distributed to the community list.

Tim

From: 
openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern...@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern...@lists.launchpad.net
 [mailto:openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern...@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of 
Sean Roberts
Sent: 09 January 2013 01:55
To: OpenStack community; openstack
Subject: [Openstack] Calling all user group and meetup organizers

We are going to have a planning meeting on Tuesday, 15 Jan 2012 11:00am to 
1:00pm PST. RSVP via  http://www.meetup.com/openstack/events/93593062/  Connect 
remotely via webex 
https://yahoomeetings.webex.com/yahoomeetings/j.php?ED=160663792UID=492396097RT=MiM0
If this time doesn't work for you, get ahold of me directly via 
skype:seanroberts66, email, mobile, irc:sarob, twitter:sarob, or carrier pigeon.

Stefano and Thierry will be joining us. I want to get input from people that 
run user groups and meetups.

See you then!

Sean Roberts
Infrastructure Strategy
sean...@yahoo-inc.commailto:sean...@yahoo-inc.com
Direct (408) 349-5234  Mobile (925) 980-4729

701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA, 94089-0703, US
Phone (408) 349-3300  Fax (408) 349-3301

[http://forgood.zenfs.com/logos/yahoo.png]
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] [openstack-community] Calling all user group and meetup organizers

2013-01-15 Thread Sean Roberts
Agreed, creating a speaker list is on the to do list.

~sean

On Jan 15, 2013, at 6:16 AM, andi_a...@dell.commailto:andi_a...@dell.com 
andi_a...@dell.commailto:andi_a...@dell.com wrote:

Hi Sean,
  Thanks for taking the initiative to organize this.

I’d like to toss another agenda item if I may.
I started, and currently help organize the Boston meetup, and we’ve been 
blessed with lots of local resources, both in terms of facilities and openstack 
enthusiasts.
Feedback I’ve gotten from multiple folks is that it would be useful to make 
available technical experts on up and coming projects (ceilometer, heat, new 
quantum services , cinder etc). While in the past I coordinated with project 
PTL’s to locate local experts, it might be more efficient (and less troubling 
to PTL’s) to have a community effort around this. If local presence is less 
than possible, then various collaboration tools could work.
After that long promo, the agenda item would be – how do UG’s help with 
incubating projects, and what kind of support the Openstack community at large 
supports that?

Regards,
a.




From: Sean Roberts [mailto:sean...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 6:26 PM
To: OpenStack community; openstack
Cc: Hirschfeld, Rob; Pemmaraju, Kamesh; Abes, Andi; 
trevor.low...@gmail.commailto:trevor.low...@gmail.com; 
stephon.strip...@dreamhost.commailto:stephon.strip...@dreamhost.com; 
ca...@hq.newdream.netmailto:ca...@hq.newdream.net; 
brent.scot...@rackspace.commailto:brent.scot...@rackspace.com; 
kmest...@cisco.commailto:kmest...@cisco.com; 
lloydost...@gmail.commailto:lloydost...@gmail.com; 
freedom...@gmail.commailto:freedom...@gmail.com; 
duyujie@gmail.commailto:duyujie@gmail.com; 
santiagoc...@outlook.commailto:santiagoc...@outlook.com; 
sc...@kent.ac.ukmailto:sc...@kent.ac.uk; 
moha...@egyptcloudforum.commailto:moha...@egyptcloudforum.com; 
ilkka.turu...@jamk.fimailto:ilkka.turu...@jamk.fi; 
bere...@b1-systems.demailto:bere...@b1-systems.de; 
bruce...@cyberport.hkmailto:bruce...@cyberport.hk; 
marton.k...@xemeti.commailto:marton.k...@xemeti.com; 
deepakgarg.i...@gmail.commailto:deepakgarg.i...@gmail.com; 
fr...@meruvian.orgmailto:fr...@meruvian.org; 
tim.hor...@cit.iemailto:tim.hor...@cit.ie; 
fen...@ubuntu.commailto:fen...@ubuntu.com; 
mypa...@gmail.commailto:mypa...@gmail.com; 
muha...@lbox.ccmailto:muha...@lbox.cc; 
hang.t...@dtt.vnmailto:hang.t...@dtt.vn
Subject: Re: [openstack-community] Calling all user group and meetup organizers

Agenda for tomorrow's user group / meetup planning meeting

 *
 *   Review of user group and meetup template
 *   Meetups fit into the larger plan of user committee and summit to summit 
development how?
 *   Where would be the location for social materials like videos, meetup logs, 
and other meeting related items?
 *   Where do operators go to figure out how to run OpenStack in production?
 *   Can the Foundation start working with some Universities for meeting space, 
sponsorship, and student participation? Is the Foundation interested in Phd 
thesis sponsorship?
 *   If possible I like to get some supporters for a 
groups.openstack.orghttp://groups.openstack.org site, including content 
writers and some developer resources from the community. We have a lot of 
knowledge about running / starting an user group, and need to write it down, 
publish on the site and share it with newcomers.  I think this is answered by 
the user group template information that will be published to 
http://wiki.openstack.org/OpenStackUserGroups.
 *   Should there be an OpenStack user group and/or meetup approval process? 
How do we clean up user groups and meetups that are abandoned?

Sean Roberts
Infrastructure Strategy
sean...@yahoo-inc.commailto:sean...@yahoo-inc.com
Direct (408) 349-5234  Mobile (925) 980-4729

701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA, 94089-0703, US
Phone (408) 349-3300  Fax (408) 349-3301

[http://forgood.zenfs.com/logos/yahoo.png]

On 1/14/13 2:07 PM, Sean Roberts 
sean...@yahoo-inc.commailto:sean...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:

Reminder for the global user group planning meetup, tomorrow, Tuesday, 15 Jan 
2012 11:00am to 1:00pm PST  http://www.meetup.com/openstack/events/93593062/
Join us!


Sean Roberts
Infrastructure Strategy
sean...@yahoo-inc.commailto:sean...@yahoo-inc.com
Direct (408) 349-5234  Mobile (925) 980-4729

701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA, 94089-0703, US
Phone (408) 349-3300  Fax (408) 349-3301

[http://forgood.zenfs.com/logos/yahoo.png]

On 1/9/13 1:05 PM, Tim Horgan tim.hor...@cit.iemailto:tim.hor...@cit.ie 
wrote:

Hi Séan,

I run the OpenStack Ireland meetup group, just wondering if your meeting is 
targeting only groups in the East Coast of the USA?

Kind Regards,
Tim

On 9 Jan 2013, at 00:54, Sean Roberts 
sean...@yahoo-inc.commailto:sean...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:


We are going to have a planning meeting on Tuesday, 15 Jan 2012 11:00am to 
1:00pm PST. RSVP via  http://www.meetup.com/openstack/events/93593062/  Connect 
remotely via webex 
https

Re: [Openstack] [openstack-community] Calling all user group and meetup organizers

2013-01-15 Thread Sean Roberts
Yes, join us! Add yourself to the mailing list by wiki.openstack.org. 

~sean

On Jan 15, 2013, at 6:20 AM, Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote:

 hi all
 
 I am from OpenStack Indonesia User Group..
 
 love of to be part of the movement.
 
 Hope can join the webex.
 
 but I am glad , if you can share to mailing list first.
 
 F

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] [openstack-community] Calling all user group and meetup organizers

2013-01-14 Thread Sean Roberts
Reminder for the global user group planning meetup, tomorrow, Tuesday, 15 Jan 
2012 11:00am to 1:00pm PST  http://www.meetup.com/openstack/events/93593062/
Join us!


Sean Roberts
Infrastructure Strategy
sean...@yahoo-inc.commailto:sean...@yahoo-inc.com
Direct (408) 349-5234  Mobile (925) 980-4729

701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA, 94089-0703, US
Phone (408) 349-3300  Fax (408) 349-3301

[http://forgood.zenfs.com/logos/yahoo.png]

On 1/9/13 1:05 PM, Tim Horgan tim.hor...@cit.iemailto:tim.hor...@cit.ie 
wrote:

Hi Séan,

I run the OpenStack Ireland meetup group, just wondering if your meeting is 
targeting only groups in the East Coast of the USA?

Kind Regards,
Tim

On 9 Jan 2013, at 00:54, Sean Roberts 
sean...@yahoo-inc.commailto:sean...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:

We are going to have a planning meeting on Tuesday, 15 Jan 2012 11:00am to 
1:00pm PST. RSVP via  http://www.meetup.com/openstack/events/93593062/  Connect 
remotely via webex 
https://yahoomeetings.webex.com/yahoomeetings/j.php?ED=160663792UID=492396097RT=MiM0
If this time doesn't work for you, get ahold of me directly via 
skype:seanroberts66, email, mobile, irc:sarob, twitter:sarob, or carrier pigeon.

Stefano and Thierry will be joining us. I want to get input from people that 
run user groups and meetups.

See you then!

Sean Roberts
Infrastructure Strategy
sean...@yahoo-inc.commailto:sean...@yahoo-inc.com
Direct (408) 349-5234  Mobile (925) 980-4729

701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA, 94089-0703, US
Phone (408) 349-3300  Fax (408) 349-3301

[http://forgood.zenfs.com/logos/yahoo.png]
___
Community mailing list
commun...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:commun...@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community




Regards,
Tim


-
TIM HORGAN
Head of Cloud Computing Centre of Excellence
Extended Campus Office
Cork Institute of Technology, Cork, Ireland
phone: +353 214335120callto:+353%2021%204335120 | mobile: +353 87 
9439333callto:+353%2087%209439333
twitter: @timhorganhttps://twitter.com/#%21/timhorgan | skype: 
timothy.horganhttps://twitter.com/#%21/timhorgan
linkedin: http://ie.linkedin.com/in/timhorgan | web: 
http://cloud.cit.iehttp://cloud.cit.ie/
-

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] [openstack-community] Calling all user group and meetup organizers

2013-01-14 Thread Sean Roberts
Agenda for tomorrow's user group / meetup planning meeting

 *
 *   Review of user group and meetup template
 *   Meetups fit into the larger plan of user committee and summit to summit 
development how?
 *   Where would be the location for social materials like videos, meetup logs, 
and other meeting related items?
 *   Where do operators go to figure out how to run OpenStack in production?
 *   Can the Foundation start working with some Universities for meeting space, 
sponsorship, and student participation? Is the Foundation interested in Phd 
thesis sponsorship?
 *   If possible I like to get some supporters for a groups.openstack.org site, 
including content writers and some developer resources from the community. We 
have a lot of knowledge about running / starting an user group, and need to 
write it down, publish on the site and share it with newcomers.  I think this 
is answered by the user group template information that will be published to 
http://wiki.openstack.org/OpenStackUserGroups.
 *   Should there be an OpenStack user group and/or meetup approval process? 
How do we clean up user groups and meetups that are abandoned?

Sean Roberts
Infrastructure Strategy
sean...@yahoo-inc.com
Direct (408) 349-5234  Mobile (925) 980-4729

701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA, 94089-0703, US
Phone (408) 349-3300  Fax (408) 349-3301

[http://forgood.zenfs.com/logos/yahoo.png]

On 1/14/13 2:07 PM, Sean Roberts 
sean...@yahoo-inc.commailto:sean...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:

Reminder for the global user group planning meetup, tomorrow, Tuesday, 15 Jan 
2012 11:00am to 1:00pm PST  http://www.meetup.com/openstack/events/93593062/
Join us!


Sean Roberts
Infrastructure Strategy
sean...@yahoo-inc.commailto:sean...@yahoo-inc.com
Direct (408) 349-5234  Mobile (925) 980-4729

701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA, 94089-0703, US
Phone (408) 349-3300  Fax (408) 349-3301

[http://forgood.zenfs.com/logos/yahoo.png]

On 1/9/13 1:05 PM, Tim Horgan tim.hor...@cit.iemailto:tim.hor...@cit.ie 
wrote:

Hi Séan,

I run the OpenStack Ireland meetup group, just wondering if your meeting is 
targeting only groups in the East Coast of the USA?

Kind Regards,
Tim

On 9 Jan 2013, at 00:54, Sean Roberts 
sean...@yahoo-inc.commailto:sean...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:

We are going to have a planning meeting on Tuesday, 15 Jan 2012 11:00am to 
1:00pm PST. RSVP via  http://www.meetup.com/openstack/events/93593062/  Connect 
remotely via webex 
https://yahoomeetings.webex.com/yahoomeetings/j.php?ED=160663792UID=492396097RT=MiM0
If this time doesn't work for you, get ahold of me directly via 
skype:seanroberts66, email, mobile, irc:sarob, twitter:sarob, or carrier pigeon.

Stefano and Thierry will be joining us. I want to get input from people that 
run user groups and meetups.

See you then!

Sean Roberts
Infrastructure Strategy
sean...@yahoo-inc.commailto:sean...@yahoo-inc.com
Direct (408) 349-5234  Mobile (925) 980-4729

701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA, 94089-0703, US
Phone (408) 349-3300  Fax (408) 349-3301

[http://forgood.zenfs.com/logos/yahoo.png]
___
Community mailing list
commun...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:commun...@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community




Regards,
Tim


-
TIM HORGAN
Head of Cloud Computing Centre of Excellence
Extended Campus Office
Cork Institute of Technology, Cork, Ireland
phone: +353 214335120callto:+353%2021%204335120 | mobile: +353 87 
9439333callto:+353%2087%209439333
twitter: @timhorganhttps://twitter.com/#%21/timhorgan | skype: 
timothy.horganhttps://twitter.com/#%21/timhorgan
linkedin: http://ie.linkedin.com/in/timhorgan | web: 
http://cloud.cit.iehttp://cloud.cit.ie/
-

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] [openstack-community] Calling all user group and meetup organizers

2013-01-11 Thread Sean Roberts
This is for everybody. Look forward having you join us!

Sean Roberts
Infrastructure Strategy
sean...@yahoo-inc.com
Direct (408) 349-5234  Mobile (925) 980-4729

701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA, 94089-0703, US
Phone (408) 349-3300  Fax (408) 349-3301

[http://forgood.zenfs.com/logos/yahoo.png]

On 1/9/13 1:05 PM, Tim Horgan tim.hor...@cit.iemailto:tim.hor...@cit.ie 
wrote:

Hi Séan,

I run the OpenStack Ireland meetup group, just wondering if your meeting is 
targeting only groups in the East Coast of the USA?

Kind Regards,
Tim

On 9 Jan 2013, at 00:54, Sean Roberts 
sean...@yahoo-inc.commailto:sean...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:

We are going to have a planning meeting on Tuesday, 15 Jan 2012 11:00am to 
1:00pm PST. RSVP via  http://www.meetup.com/openstack/events/93593062/  Connect 
remotely via webex 
https://yahoomeetings.webex.com/yahoomeetings/j.php?ED=160663792UID=492396097RT=MiM0
If this time doesn't work for you, get ahold of me directly via 
skype:seanroberts66, email, mobile, irc:sarob, twitter:sarob, or carrier pigeon.

Stefano and Thierry will be joining us. I want to get input from people that 
run user groups and meetups.

See you then!

Sean Roberts
Infrastructure Strategy
sean...@yahoo-inc.commailto:sean...@yahoo-inc.com
Direct (408) 349-5234  Mobile (925) 980-4729

701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA, 94089-0703, US
Phone (408) 349-3300  Fax (408) 349-3301

[http://forgood.zenfs.com/logos/yahoo.png]
___
Community mailing list
commun...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:commun...@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community




Regards,
Tim


-
TIM HORGAN
Head of Cloud Computing Centre of Excellence
Extended Campus Office
Cork Institute of Technology, Cork, Ireland
phone: +353 214335120callto:+353%2021%204335120 | mobile: +353 87 
9439333callto:+353%2087%209439333
twitter: @timhorganhttps://twitter.com/#%21/timhorgan | skype: 
timothy.horganhttps://twitter.com/#%21/timhorgan
linkedin: http://ie.linkedin.com/in/timhorgan | web: 
http://cloud.cit.iehttp://cloud.cit.ie/
-

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Openstack] Calling all user group and meetup organizers

2013-01-08 Thread Sean Roberts
We are going to have a planning meeting on Tuesday, 15 Jan 2012 11:00am to 
1:00pm PST. RSVP via  http://www.meetup.com/openstack/events/93593062/  Connect 
remotely via webex 
https://yahoomeetings.webex.com/yahoomeetings/j.php?ED=160663792UID=492396097RT=MiM0
If this time doesn't work for you, get ahold of me directly via 
skype:seanroberts66, email, mobile, irc:sarob, twitter:sarob, or carrier pigeon.

Stefano and Thierry will be joining us. I want to get input from people that 
run user groups and meetups.

See you then!

Sean Roberts
Infrastructure Strategy
sean...@yahoo-inc.com
Direct (408) 349-5234  Mobile (925) 980-4729

701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA, 94089-0703, US
Phone (408) 349-3300  Fax (408) 349-3301

[http://forgood.zenfs.com/logos/yahoo.png]
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] Design summit feedback?

2012-04-19 Thread Sean Roberts
We can put out thoughts together then forward them to Lauren Sell. It will have 
more impact than the mailing list or hitting up the conference organizers 
individually.

~sean

On Apr 19, 2012, at 11:33 AM, Joshua Harlow 
harlo...@yahoo-inc.commailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:

Hi all,

Hope everyone had a super-awesome design summit.

Is there a place where we can give feedback on what people think worked/didn’t 
work at the summit.

I have some (many) suggestions and was wondering if there is a place for this?

-Josh
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : 
openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] Design summit feedback?

2012-04-19 Thread Sean Roberts
To clarify, I meant yahoo should collect its feedback together and post it.

~sean

On Apr 19, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Sean Roberts 
sean...@yahoo-inc.commailto:sean...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:

We can put out thoughts together then forward them to Lauren Sell. It will have 
more impact than the mailing list or hitting up the conference organizers 
individually.

~sean

On Apr 19, 2012, at 11:33 AM, Joshua Harlow 
harlo...@yahoo-inc.commailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:

Hi all,

Hope everyone had a super-awesome design summit.

Is there a place where we can give feedback on what people think worked/didn’t 
work at the summit.

I have some (many) suggestions and was wondering if there is a place for this?

-Josh
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : 
openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : 
openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack Foundation] Foundation Structure: An Alternative

2012-03-12 Thread Sean Roberts
How about as many companies that want to contribute annually $100K to running 
the foundation separate from marketing and sponsorship, can do so.  Each 
company or a self-affiliated block of companies can put forward their board 
candidate. The companies that contributed to the board can then vote on 2/3 of 
the overall board membership. The 8 candidates with the largest number of votes 
are board members for one year. The user community would still have 1/3 of the 
board seats to elect 4 people of note. The board membership would be limited to 
12 people. This way, all the committees and boards will be elected.
A board membership code of conduct will be very important in this situation, as 
to protect the community from some companies up to mischief.

BTW, I see no reason to dirty the good name of Heidi Klum by dragging her into 
this.
sean
roberts

infrastructure strategy

sean...@yahoo-inc.comapplewebdata://2E35986A-DC2A-436F-BB4A-C451982006C2/sean...@yahoo-inc.com
direct 408-349-5234mobile 925-980-4729

701 first avenue, sunnyvale, ca, 94089-0703, us
phone (408) 349 3300fax (408) 349 3301



On 3/12/12 11:06 AM, Dallas Kashuba 
dal...@dreamhost.commailto:dal...@dreamhost.com wrote:


On Mar 12, 2012, at 2:45 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:

Boris Renski Jr. wrote:
While I like the simplicity and elegance of the newly proposed
structure, I don’t see how it does away with the evils of the
pay-to-play model…. Which is what you purport we are striving to
achieve. What you, Josh, proposed is a simplified pay-to-play that
arguably embraces the evils for the “market driven selfishness” in an
even more obvious way than the model before it. In your case, all the
seats are simply purchased for a fixed price of $200K.
Right, any pay-to-play model will create a threshold effect, and Josh's
proposal is just lowering the price to pay to get a reserved board seat
to something that a company like Piston Cloud can pay. Since a lot of
the 156 companies supporting OpenStack can afford such a price tag,
you end up with a board containing too many directors.

This is something I was wondering about myself.  Would there be a limit on the 
number of directors under Josh's proposal?


Once we accept this, the question of structuring the board really
becomes the question of how does one raise the maximum amount of money
to continue to have a centralized body with a mission to evangelize the
project. You can structure it by tiers to let the bigger guys pay more
and get a bigger logo on the homepage. You can do a flat structure like
Josh proposed. You can auction off the board seats etc.
I see four models for this:
All individual seats: All board seats are elected, you get one vote for
every foundation member. Sponsoring is done separately. This is likely
to raise the smallest amount of money, and the problem remains at
another level: what is a foundation member ?.

I agree that this model is likely to raise the smallest amount of money.

Tiered structure: this is the current proposal, which is well balanced.
The only issue is that the board grows by 3 people when (if) a strategic
member is added.

This is another thing I was wondering about.  Will there be a limit on the 
number of strategic members?  I don't see the foundation wanting to turn away 
someone waving money around, but then you have to deal with board growth.


Single-price: this is Josh's proposal, but I think it will result in a
board that is too big and unable to function.

Pay-to-vote: you have two classes: corporate seats and individual seats.
Individual members elect the individual seats (which represent 25-33% of
the total). Corporate seats are also all elected and corporations get a
vote for every ?$ they put in. One drawback is that large corporations
which are no longer guaranteed of getting a board seat will probably pay
less under this model.

Also agreed that large corporations will likely pay less without a guaranteed 
board seat.


We've been watching this conversation with much interest over the last couple 
of days at DreamHost.  Its great to see so many smart people who clearly care a 
great deal about this project and the foundation!

I've been personally wrestling with this balance of fundraising vs the best 
leadership for the foundation.  I think ultimately the best leadership would be 
the meritocratic approach insulated from the money side of things, but I also 
see a lot of value in the financial stability provided by larger companies 
committing to a significant amount of funding over the longer term.


One additional question I've been pondering relates to both the Single-price 
and Tiered structure models as Thierry referred to them here.  If you do put 
limits on total board seats (and thus total foundation membership), what do you 
do if there are more companies interested in membership than you have spots 
available?  Do companies get turned away and if they do, what process is used 
to figure out who is in and who is out

Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack Foundation] Foundation Structure: An Alternative

2012-03-10 Thread Sean Roberts
We will make ourselves available. I am offering up a Yahoo meeting space in SF, 
Santa Clara, or Sunnyvale. Teleconference may be available on short notice.

~sean

On Mar 9, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Joshua McKenty 
jos...@pistoncloud.commailto:jos...@pistoncloud.com wrote:

This is great!

Jonathan, do you think a completely-elected board is something that the larger 
corporations would go along with? Ben's suggestion to that effect certainly 
seems to be the simplest model, since we can scale the membership, deliver 
specific value for cash contributions, and still manage the size of the board.

Regarding the Individual Member seats - I would like to echo Devin's concerns 
about stacking by strategic members. If these are truly independent, meaning 
that they're not employees of the corporate members, then I think it's a great 
benefit to have them be part of the board! I'm imagining folks like Tim Bell 
(CERN), Peter Mell (NIST) or Vint Cerf on there.

Boris, I completely agree with decoupling of the business side of OpenStack 
from the technical side, and I think managing two separate organizations would 
be one way to achieve this. My concerns are solely on the business side right 
now. I've spent a lot of time chatting with the PTLs today, and I have 
confidence that they can hold the technical community to a meritocratic 
standard. I think the proposal to vote for seats on the foundation board is 
more about managing board size, than any crossover of technical community 
management.

Having said that, I'm still concerned with the idea that we would let the 
bigger guys pay more and get a bigger logo on the homepage. If we're going to 
sell OpenStack privileges, I think we need to do it ala-cart, and explicitly.

Some examples (echoing Ben Cherian's comments) might be:
 - Use of the trademark (for products, training, or certification)
 - Sponsorship of openstack events
 - Priority registration for summits and conferences (not necessarily in favor 
of this one...)

While I was drafting this up, I saw Sean Robert's email suggesting that we meet 
face-to-face and work through some of this together - it seems like a fantastic 
plan to me, and I'll bump everything else from my schedule to make it happen if 
others are interested. What do you guys think?


--
Joshua McKenty, CEO
Piston Cloud Computing, Inc.
w: (650) 24-CLOUD
m: (650) 283-6846
http://www.pistoncloud.com

Oh, Westley, we'll never survive!
Nonsense. You're only saying that because no one ever has.


On Friday, March 9, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:

On Mar 9, 2012, at 4:50 PM, Boris Renski Jr. wrote:
The one thing I would do away with is the “elected board members” in favor of 
more associate member seats. This almost feels like a way to compensate the 
technology side for giving the marketing side leverage over the former. If we 
feel that this is necessary, it is a symptom of presence of 
technology-commercial coupling and we need to fix something else. All technical 
members should be elected based on merit. All board members – appointed based 
on monetary/evangelism contribution. Decoupling between technology direction 
and purchasing power should be rock solid.

Thanks for the thoughts, Boris. One point I'd make: the Individual Member seats 
are not just about compensating the technology side. It gives an opportunity 
for the entire community to elect representatives. These could be some of the 
luminaries Josh spoke of or others unaffiliated with any corporate member. 
Individual Membership is not limited solely to developers who are contributing 
code, but would include users, deployers, translators, marketers and people 
with all sorts of involvement in the community. Individual Membership is free 
and a great place for participants academic institutions, non-profits, etc. to 
participate with no price tag.

Jonathan.

___
Foundation mailing list
foundat...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:foundat...@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/foundation
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] Remove Zones code - FFE

2012-02-19 Thread Sean Roberts
+1 for compute-cells

~sean

On Feb 19, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:

 
 Fully agree with the prefix for the cell... there should be storage-cells
 and compute-cells with different goals in terms of data locality and
 availability, zone has become too overloaded...
 
 Tim
 
 -Original Message-
 From: openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern...@lists.launchpad.net
 [mailto:openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern...@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf
 Of Mark Washenberger
 Sent: 19 February 2012 19:54
 To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Subject: Re: [Openstack] Remove Zones code - FFE
 
Remember that for many deployments, the entire system will be a
 single zone, so whatever term is used should make sense in a
 singular sense. That rules out names such as 'slice' or 'fragment'.
 
 I think this is a slightly outdated concept of zones.
 
 The key to scalability in nova is to divide the set of all compute nodes
 into
 subsets, each with its own messaging and database infrastructure. The
 granularity of everything else (scheduling, api, volume, network,
 what-have-
 you) is just an implementation or deployment detail that should be
 flexible
 depending on our ultimate implementation and any alternative strategies we
 expose to deployers.
 
 With this in mind it's still true that the smallest deployment would be
 likely
 include just one compute zone (or compute cell, as we are trending). But
 that is a far cry from the whole system even in a small deployment.
 
 For this reason, whatever name we choose I would hope we prefix it with
 compute- (i.e. compute-zone or compute-cell) so that we aren't letting
 language trick us out of some of our better implementation options, such
 as
 allowing deployers to scale compute, volume, network, and api resources
 separately.
 
 Ed Leafe ed.le...@rackspace.com said:
 
 On Feb 18, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Nathanael Burton wrote:
 
 Sectors remind me too much of disks.
 
Agreed.
 
 How about? Layers, Slices, Fragments, Knots...
 
Remember that for many deployments, the entire system will be a
 single zone, so whatever term is used should make sense in a
 singular sense. That rules out names such as 'slice' or 'fragment'.
 
'Knot'? In what sense can 'knot' be used?
 
I still prefer 'cell'. The parallel to single celled /
 multi-cellular
 life forms makes sense, and there is really no overloading of the word
 in the world of computers.
 
 
 
 -- Ed Leafe
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
 smime.p7s
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Sean Roberts
Hmm. Sounds like a good idea. I will reach out to the board and ask.

~sean

On Feb 6, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Joshua Harlow 
harlo...@yahoo-inc.commailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:

Hi all,

Over the weekend I was thinking (I know a first, haha).

I was wondering if the community could elevate devstack to a official 
openstack project, instead of being a unofficial project. Since it seems like 
pretty much every developer (and even CI) is either depending on the shell 
script or the python script, so the unofficial wording seems incorrect. 
Hopefully we can have that happen and have this official project focus on 
just a developer setup script (imho the python version, since it fits in with 
the whole python model every other component is using and allows for features 
the shell script is not doing, multi-distro support, starting, stopping, 
uninstalling, object oriented design, to name a few...) of the openstack 
components (and not dive into the scripts that are showing up), ie leave that 
to 3rd party websites.

What does everyone think?

Maybe this can happen after essex?

-Josh
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : 
openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] Proposal for new devstack (v2?)

2012-01-20 Thread Sean Roberts
Sweet. Will do next week.

~sean

On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:25 PM, Joshua Harlow 
harlo...@yahoo-inc.commailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:

For those that want to try it glance should be working!
Since glance has dependencies on keystone, and the database both of these will 
be installed and started automatically (uninstall and starting and such should 
work!)
How to accomplish this can be seen at the github page readme.
https://github.com/yahoo/Openstack-Devstack2#readme

I will write up some documents on the github twiki sometime soon with more 
details!
Nova and the rest should be coming along soon.
Hopefully this will make everyones lives easier in the end :-)
Please try it out, feedback welcome :-)

-Josh

On 1/18/12 10:17 PM, Gary Kotton ga...@radware.com wrote:

Brilliant!


From: openstack-bounces+garyk=radware@lists.launchpad.net 
[mailto:openstack-bounces+garyk=radware@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of 
Joshua Harlow
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 9:21 PM
To: Mark McLoughlin
Cc: Andy Smith; openstack
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Proposal for new devstack (v2?)

Sweet, we are working on getting functionality for rhel and ubuntu up and going 
and then hopefully some docs (and code comments) can be added in so other 
people can know exactly what is going on (without the typical “go read the 
code” response). But the idea is the following:

Have a set of json files (+ I added the ability to have simple comments) that 
specify the needed dependencies + versions (+ other metadata) for each 
distribution.

https://github.com/yahoo/Openstack-Devstack2/blob/master/conf/pkgs/general.json

Have those different sections be handled by a class specific to a distribution 
(or possibly shared, ie fedora and rhel).

https://github.com/yahoo/Openstack-Devstack2/tree/master/devstack/packaging 
(WIP as we work with the rhel peoples to get the dependencies flushed out)

Similar with pip installs (if any):

https://github.com/yahoo/Openstack-Devstack2/tree/master/conf/pips

Then this information can be updated as needed  for each release of openstack 
(with exact dependencies, y a win for everyone!) so that this whole pkg 
process becomes better for everyone.

Of course also we are allowing other types of running besides screen (I like 
just having it in the background via a fork with output going to files...)

That’s whats going on so far :-)

Thx,

-Josh

On 1/18/12 3:45 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 11:20 -0800, Joshua Harlow wrote:
 My goals were/are/(may continue to be, haha) the following:
...
  3.  Have the ability to have pkg/pip installation (and definition
 separate from the main code, already starting to be done), in more
 than 1 distro.
 *   This allows others to easily know what versions of packages
 work for a given openstack release for more than one distro (yes
 that's right, more than ubuntu)

Serious kudos to you guys on this part. IMHO, having a devstack that
supports multiple distros is a massive win for OpenStack generally.

Hopefully we can dig in and help with Fedora support soonish

Cheers,
Mark.



___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : 
openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp