Let's imagine that the service that launch instances can tag the
instance with:
a) a common service identifier (constant)
b) a uuid unique for each Unit of the service
such as constant:uuid
If that tag is passed onto the events which ceilometer stores in its
entirety as meta, I do not see what
, Graham Bins, Francis Lacoste, Thierry Carrez,
Anne Gentle, Surya Prabhakar, Nick Barcet and the OpenStack
Infrastructure team have provided help in making this release possible
(we hope we did not miss anyone here...).
Why doesn’t ceilometer do this?
===
We would enjoy hearing
of Ceilometer[1][2] which
provides a central point for a billing implementation to fetch its usage
data from.
Not sure if that fully answers your question though...
[1]http://launchpad.net/ceilometer
[2]http://ceilometer.readthedocs.org
Best,
--
Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
aka: nijaba
On 09/13/2012 04:33 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
Reading through the post from Mirantis on bare metal support on
OpenStack
(http://www.mirantis.com/blog/bare-metal-provisioning-with-openstack-cloud/),
I was wondering how this would interact with the metering work in
ceilometer.
So far, only
On 09/11/2012 11:22 PM, Nick Barcet wrote:
PLEASE NOTE THE ALTERNATIVE MEETING TIME WED 21:00 UTC
The metering project team will hold its next meeting at alternate time
on *Wednesday* at 9PM UTC
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=21min=0sec=0.
Everyone
of ceilometer
* Open discussion
If you are not able to attend or have additional topic you would like to
cover, please update the agenda on the wiki.
Cheers,
--
Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
aka: nijaba, nicolas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 09/05/2012 11:51 AM, Nick Barcet wrote:
Thanks for asking, I was just about to come up with this. So based on
the poll, it seems that the 3-4pm UTC time slot received the most favors
with 9 yes, 1 if need be and 1 no. So I guess we'll have to do
without Angus, unless we want to do
On 09/05/2012 12:19 PM, Nick Barcet wrote:
PLEASE NOTE THE NEW MEETING TIME, ONE HOUR EARLIER
The metering project team holds a meeting in #openstack-meeting,
Thursdays at 1500 UTC
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=16min=0sec=0.
Everyone is welcome
On 09/05/2012 08:55 AM, SPN wrote:
On 2012-08-31 21:34, Nick Barcet wrote:
On 08/30/2012 09:49 AM, Nick Barcet wrote:
I am about to open a poll to pick from 0600, 1200, 1500 and 2100 UTC on
Google. Will reply to this thread when it opens. We'll have to go with
what fits most.
The poll
presence from down
under
* Open discussion
If you are not able to attend or have additional topic you would like to
cover, please update the agenda on the wiki.
Cheers,
--
Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
aka: nijaba, nicolas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 09/05/2012 01:11 PM, surya_prabha...@dell.com wrote:
On 09/05/12 15:49, Nick Barcet wrote:
PLEASE NOTE THE NEW MEETING TIME, ONE HOUR EARLIER
The metering project team holds a meeting in #openstack-meeting,
Thursdays at 1500 UTC
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock
On 08/30/2012 09:49 AM, Nick Barcet wrote:
I am about to open a poll to pick from 0600, 1200, 1500 and 2100 UTC on
Google. Will reply to this thread when it opens. We'll have to go with
what fits most.
The poll is now open at [1], please submit your preference(s) there. I
will close
On 08/30/2012 03:40 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
Hi,
You should read Ceilometer Project [1] and try it into DevStack directly
in editing localrc before to run devstack and add :
enable_service ceilometer-acompute,ceilometer-acentral, ceilometer-collector
Enjoy !
[1]
On 08/30/2012 09:11 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 08/30/2012 04:20 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30 2012, Angus Salkeld wrote:
I'd like to attend but am in Australia. I am quite flexible so it might
be easier to say what times don't suit.
Basically midnight - 6am which in UTC is 14:00
On 08/29/2012 08:29 PM, Nick Barcet wrote:
Hi,
The metering project team holds a meeting in #openstack-meeting,
Thursdays at 1600 UTC
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=16min=0sec=0.
Everyone is welcome.
Agenda:
http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda
to the project, we are happy to receive
your suggestions too, but since this meeting is meant to coordinate
between contributors, the result of this poll will be heavily skewed
toward active members preferences.
[1] http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/
Thanks,
--
Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
aka
,
--
Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
aka: nijaba, nicolas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https
On 08/23/2012 05:18 AM, Nick Barcet wrote:
Hi,
The metering project team holds a meeting in #openstack-meeting,
Thursdays at 1600 UTC
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=16min=0sec=0.
Everyone is welcome.
Agenda:
http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda
to attend or have additional topic you would like to
cover, please update the agenda on the wiki.
Cheers,
--
Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
aka: nijaba, nicolas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Mailing list
.
Cheers,
--
Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
aka: nijaba, nicolas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https
On 08/16/2012 03:54 PM, Nick Barcet wrote:
Hi,
The metering project team holds a meeting in #openstack-meeting,
Thursdays at 1600 UTC
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=16min=0sec=0.
Everyone is welcome.
Agenda:
http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda
On 08/08/2012 05:54 PM, Nick Barcet wrote:
Hi,
The metering project team holds a meeting in #openstack-meeting,
Thursdays at 1600 UTC
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=16min=0sec=0.
Everyone is welcome.
Agenda:
http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda
and find contributor to
work on it if we are going to do it
* Discuss integration with Heat
* Open discussion
If you are not able to attend or have additional topic you would like to
cover, please update the agenda on the wiki.
Cheers,
--
Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
aka: nijaba, nicolas
/EfficientMetering/RoadMap
[2] http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering/APIProposalv1
[3] http://ceilometer.readthedocs.org
Thanks for your help and support,
--
Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
aka: nijaba, nicolas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 07/11/2012 02:24 PM, Nick Barcet wrote:
Candidates should, before July 24th:
1/ declare themselves on this mailing list
It has been so much fun and so rewarding to kick-start this project,
that I can't resist to propose myself as Candidate. Not being a true
developer places me in an awkward
On 07/05/2012 07:02 PM, Nick Barcet wrote:
On 07/04/2012 05:38 PM, Day, Phil wrote:
Hi All,
I’m thinking it’s about time we had an OpenStack User Group meeting in
the UK , and would be interested in hearing from anyone interested in
attending, presenting, helping to organise, etc.
London
On 07/11/2012 02:34 PM, Nick Barcet wrote:
Hi,
The metering project team holds a meeting in #openstack-meeting,
Thursdays at 1600 UTC
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=16min=0sec=0.
Everyone is welcome.
Agenda:
http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda
On 07/11/2012 05:18 AM, Nick Lothian wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to understand how people are doing management of servers and
storage across multiple clouds (or perhaps it is only me that has this
problem!).
I've created a short survey I'd appreciate any responses on:
be found on the above
mentioned wiki page, but in the event we have missed someone, please shout.
Candidates should, before July 24th:
1/ declare themselves on this mailing list
2/ add their name on the wiki page
[1] http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering/PTLElectionProcess
Cheers,
--
Nick
-10-20.01.html
-
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-07-10-20.01.log.html
* Open discussion
If you are not able to attend or have additional topic you would like to
cover, please update the agenda on the wiki.
Cheers,
--
Nick Barcet nick.bar
There are a way to limit the bandwith of the tenants??
This would be a request for Quantum, which I don't think has been fully
addressed yet, based on this thread [4].
[4] http://www.mail-archive.com/openstack@lists.launchpad.net/msg13611.html
Hope this helps,
--
Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
aka
.
Thanks,
Nick
On Jul 5, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Nick Barcet wrote:
Dear members of the Project Policy Board,
After 3 month of work on the Ceilometer project, and great
progress being made, our last meeting IRC meeting [1] validated
that we should be submitting this project for incubation
On 07/04/2012 08:16 PM, Nick Barcet wrote:
Hi,
The metering project team holds a meeting in #openstack-meeting,
Thursdays at 1600 UTC
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=16min=0sec=0.
Everyone is welcome.
Agenda:
http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda
On 07/04/2012 05:38 PM, Day, Phil wrote:
Hi All,
I’m thinking it’s about time we had an OpenStack User Group meeting in
the UK , and would be interested in hearing from anyone interested in
attending, presenting, helping to organise, etc.
London would seem the obvious choice, but we could
://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Proposed/Ceilometer
On behalf of the Ceilometer project team,
--
Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
aka: nijaba, nicolas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net
On 06/29/2012 03:04 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
[..]
My conclusion from all of this (over-)thinking is that the ceilometer
API should assume the simple case and ignore the metadata changes when
computing the sum or maximum value for a counter over a range of time.
More complex processing will be
/civs.html
- http://www.opavote.org/
* Discuss project's next priorities
* Open discussion
If you are not able to attend or have additional topic you would like to
cover, please update the agenda on the wiki.
Cheers,
--
Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
aka: nijaba, nicolas
On 07/04/2012 10:55 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04 2012, Nick Barcet wrote:
I therefore propose that we leave the API as is, knowing the side
effects of such high level sum and duration calculations. If we agree on
this, I take the action to document the limitation of the summary
I've just committed a first of the plugin/agent documentation to
stackforge/ceilometer. Reviews welcome:
https://review.stackforge.org/#/c/250/
Thanks,
Nick
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Mailing list:
On 06/21/2012 12:44 PM, Thomas, Duncan wrote:
John Griffith on 20 June 2012 18:26 wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Nick Barcet
nick.bar...@canonical.com wrote:
What we want is to retrieve the maximum amount of data, so we can
meter
things, to bill them in the end. For now
--
Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
aka: nijaba, nicolas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net
On 06/20/2012 08:55 PM, Nick Barcet wrote:
Hi,
The metering project team holds a weekly meeting in #openstack-meeting,
Thursdays at 1600 UTC. Everyone is welcome.
http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda
Topics for this week:
* Review last week's actions
- nijaba
,
Regards,
¹ http://launchpad.net/ceilometer
--
Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
aka: nijaba, nicolas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
On 06/20/2012 07:26 PM, John Griffith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
wrote:
Hello John (or anyone else working on cinder),
As part of the ceilometer project¹, we're working on usage data
retrieval from various OpenStack components. One of them
to discuss to the wiki page.
Cheers,
--
Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
aka nijaba, nicolas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
On 06/13/2012 12:39 PM, Nick Barcet wrote:
Hi,
The metering project team holds a weekly meeting in #openstack-meeting,
Thursdays at 1600 UTC. Everyone is welcome.
http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda
Topics for this week:
* Review last week's actions
* dhellmann
effort that jd___ is leading
[1]http://www.mail-archive.com/openstack@lists.launchpad.net/msg12859.html
Cheers,
--
Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
aka nijaba, nicolas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Mailing list: https
On 06/12/2012 05:51 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
See https://review.stackforge.org/163 for the code.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
I am working on bug 1006120, adding metadata to the instance-related
On 06/13/2012 01:55 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
mailto:nick.bar...@canonical.com wrote:
On 06/12/2012 05:51 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
See https://review.stackforge.org/163 for the code.
On Tue, Jun 12
Following up on our last meeting and the comments collected on the
mailing list, here is a second version of the proposal for centrally
hosting configuration of meters in ceilometer.
The main idea is that all meters of a given type should be sending
similarly formatted information in order for
Hello,
Following up on yesterday's meeting, I have started a first version of a
google spreadsheet to estimate volume of events generated by ceilometer [1].
Comments and suggestions for improvement are of course welcome.
[1]
On 06/06/2012 05:06 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Starting a new thread for this topic...
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
mailto:nick.bar...@canonical.com wrote:
On 06/05/2012 09:03 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Right now we
On 06/06/2012 05:20 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Starting a new thread...
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
mailto:nick.bar...@canonical.com wrote:
On 06/05/2012 09:03 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Nick
On 06/05/2012 09:03 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
mailto:nick.bar...@canonical.com wrote:
On 06/05/2012 04:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm
On 06/06/2012 10:39 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05 2012, Nick Barcet wrote:
I would have thought that we may want to support different intervals per
meters, based on the billing rules that one may want to offer. For
example, I may want to bill compute by the hour but floating IPs
On 06/06/2012 10:35 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05 2012, Nick Barcet wrote:
The main idea is that all agents of a given type should be sending
similarly formatted information in order for the information to be
usable, hence the need to ensure that configuration info is centrally
On 06/05/2012 04:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Nick Barcet
nick.bar...@canonical.com mailto:nick.bar...@canonical.com wrote
On 05/23/2012 09:39 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Is there anyway u can just make it a configuration option?
v2imagemethod = ‘PUT’...
This would make sense as rfc 5789 is only 2 years old, which means that
there must be numerous firewalls and proxies which may not have been
updated yet in
On 05/22/2012 07:15 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
mailto:nick.bar...@canonical.com wrote:
On 05/22/2012 03:26 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
- In addition to a signature, I think we would need a
sequence number
On 05/21/2012 10:52 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I have written up some of my thoughts on a proposed design for
ceilometer in the wiki [1]. I'm sure there are missing details, but I
wanted to start getting ideas into writing so they could be discussed
here on the list, since I've talked about
On 05/22/2012 03:26 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
- In addition to a signature, I think we would need a sequence number
to be embedded by the agent for each message sent, so that loss of
messages, or forgery of messages, can be detected by the collector and
further audit process.
On 05/16/2012 08:44 PM, Nick Barcet wrote:
Hi,
The metering project team holds a weekly meeting in #openstack-meeting,
Thursdays at 1600 UTC
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=16min=0sec=0.
Everyone is welcome.
Since we were not able to conclude on the API
.
e) queue should be horizontally scalable
The scalability of queue servers should be achievable by increasing the
number of servers.
Not sure this list is exhaustive or viable, feel free to comment on it,
but the real question is: which queue should we be using here?
Cheers,
--
Nick Barcet
On 05/17/2012 10:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I have added a row to the list of counters for discrete events such as
uploading an image to glance [1]. Please let me know if you think I need
more exposition to explain discrete counters.
Doug
[1]
On 05/17/2012 11:13 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 05/16/2012 11:00 PM, Francis J. Lacoste wrote:
I'm now of the opinion that we exclude storage and API from the
metering project scope. Let's just focus on defining a metering
message format, bus, and maybe a client-library to make it easy to
would cover that and more.
Dan Dyer
dan.d...@hp.com
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Nick Barcet
nick.bar...@canonical.comwrote:
Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Nick Barcet
nick.bar...@canonical.comwrote:
On 05/08/2012 08:27 AM, Nick
@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
- --
Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
aka: nicolas, nijaba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: APG v1.0.8
iGsEAREIACsFAk+r1T8kHE5pY29sYXMgQmFyY2V0IDxuaWNvbGFzQGJhcmNldC5j
On 05/08/2012 08:27 AM, Nick Barcet wrote:
[..]
Thinking about this, I think we need to expend the API a bit to reflect
the evolutions of the schema that we decided last week. Here are my
proposals:
* Requests allow to
GET account_id list
change to: GET [user_id|project_id|source] list
On 05/09/2012 08:36 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
mailto:nick.bar...@canonical.com wrote:
On 05/08/2012 11:39 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
[..]
* Requests must be authenticated (separate from keystone
Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Nick Barcet
nick.bar...@canonical.comwrote:
On 05/08/2012 08:27 AM, Nick Barcet wrote:
[..]
Thinking about this, I think we need to expend the API a bit to
reflect
the evolutions of the schema that we
Hello,
The 3rd meeting of the Ceilometer project will be held on May 10th at
1600 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel on Freenode. The main subject
we will be tackling this week is the external API definition and I'd
like to gather you opinions on the subject prior to the meeting.
The current
On 05/08/2012 11:39 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
[..]
* Requests must be authenticated (separate from keystone, or only linked
to accounting type account)
What is the motivation for authenticating with a service other than
keystone?
The only thing I am trying to express here is that
Following up on the discussion on IRC yesterday during the metering meeting,
I'd like to explain my proposal to add the notion of source to the schema of
our event. The current goal we have for ceilometer is to provide a common way
to accumulate counters/meters from various openstack component
-Original Message-
From: Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Fri, 04 May 2012 2:50
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Metering] schema and counter definitions
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Turner, Whit (Cloud Services)
On 05/04/2012 02:50 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Turner, Whit (Cloud Services)
whit.tur...@hp.com wrote:
Hi - I think a flexible aggregation scheme is needed; the levels of
aggregation available should be definable in the meter independent of
On 05/04/2012 02:25 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
mailto:nick.bar...@canonical.com wrote:
Following up on the discussion on IRC yesterday during the metering
meeting, I'd like to explain my proposal to add
On 05/04/2012 03:11 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
mailto:nick.bar...@canonical.com wrote:
On 05/04/2012 02:25 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Nick Barcet
nick.bar
On 05/01/2012 02:23 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 04/30/2012 11:39 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com
mailto:l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 08:03 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Loic Dachary
On 04/25/2012 09:10 AM, Nick Barcet wrote:
Thanks to the 16 persons that took the time to give their preference on
Doodle [1]. The poll is now closed and the meeting time that came out
of it is:
Thursdays at 4pm UTC on #openstack-metering
I was not sure if we could use #openstack
On 04/27/2012 04:35 PM, Shake Chen wrote:
HI
Canonical provide the keystone document about how to config.
http://www.canonical.com/about-canonical/resources/white-papers/configuring-keystone-openstack-essex
but The document have one mistake.
when I run
Thanks to the 16 persons that took the time to give their preference on
Doodle [1]. The poll is now closed and the meeting time that came out
of it is:
Thursdays at 4pm UTC on #openstack-metering
I was not sure if we could use #openstack-meeting as we are not yet an
official project, lkm if
On 04/23/2012 10:45 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Brian Schott
brian.sch...@nimbisservices.com
mailto:brian.sch...@nimbisservices.com wrote:
Doug,
Do we mirror the table structure of nova, etc. and add
created/modified columns?
Or do
Hello Luis,
I presented a blueprint last week [1] which proposes to clearly
differentiate metering from the overall billing process. It is my
understanding that billing is too complex a beast to be solved for each
requirement in a satisfactory way and have therefore proposed that we
should first
--
*Jaesuk Ahn*, Ph.D.
Team Leader | Cloud OS Dev. Team
Cloud Infrastructure Department
KT (Korea Telecom)
*T. +82-10-9888-0328 | F. +82-303-0993-5340*
*Active member on **OpenStack Korea Community* http://www.openstack.or.kr/
Apr 23, 2012, 4:09 PM, Nick Barcet 작성:
Hello Luis,
I presented
On 04/23/2012 04:39 PM, Alexey Ababilov wrote:
Hi!
We have developed Nova Billing v2. Its documentation is currently
available at http://aababilov.github.com/nova-billing-doc.github.com/.
The documentation includes a glossary and architecture and API descriptions.
Nova Billing v2 is a
On 04/23/2012 02:39 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Philipp Wollermann wrote:
What's the advantage of replacing the native EC2 compatibility layer with
AWSOME from a user / operator point of view?
One thing that was mentioned is that the proxy could be run on top of a
public cloud that chose to
On 04/23/2012 07:06 PM, Luis Gervaso wrote:
Nick, I want contribute in the discussion group.
Luis,
I just sent your an invite to the doodle to pick the best time for this
irc meeting. Once the date will have been finalized (I'll close the
poll tomorrow EOD), I'll announce the date, time and
87 matches
Mail list logo
