On 3/4/11 7:33 PM, Eric Day wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 01:35:48PM -0600, Monsyne Dragon wrote:
I think, really, we are getting off on a tangent here. The purpose
of multitenant is to have a label ('account' or 'project' or
whatever ) that we tag resources (instances, etc) in nova with
so
Justin Santa Barbara wrote:
> The usages system (which is dependant on this) ... It has not been
> coded yet, since it is dependant on this multitenant bp. It *is*
> scheduled, and approved for the cactus release, for which merge-prop
> freeze is in ~2 weeks.
>
> Ouch. Even thou
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 01:35:48PM -0600, Monsyne Dragon wrote:
> I think, really, we are getting off on a tangent here. The purpose
> of multitenant is to have a label ('account' or 'project' or
> whatever ) that we tag resources (instances, etc) in nova with
> so that we can group together us
>
> The usages system (which is dependant on this) ... It has not been coded
> yet, since it is dependant on this multitenant bp. It *is* scheduled, and
> approved for the cactus release, for which merge-prop freeze is in ~2
> weeks.
>
Ouch. Even though it's approved though, my understanding is
On 3/4/11 2:13 PM, Justin Santa Barbara wrote:
I think, really, we are getting off on a tangent here. The purpose
of multitenant is to have a label ('account' or 'project' or
whatever ) that we tag resources (instances, etc) in nova with
so that we can group together usage r
>
>
>> I think, really, we are getting off on a tangent here. The purpose of
> multitenant is to have a label ('account' or 'project' or whatever )
> that we tag resources (instances, etc) in nova with so that we can group
> together usage reports, etc, that go to some system outside of openst
On 3/4/11 11:53 AM, Eric Day wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 06:36:14PM -0600, Monsyne Dragon wrote:
On 3/3/11 5:51 PM, Eric Day wrote:
Getting into this a bit more, I'm not sure this is something that
should be the default. For CloudServers v1.0 token auth compatibility,
I'm not even sure this
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 06:36:14PM -0600, Monsyne Dragon wrote:
> On 3/3/11 5:51 PM, Eric Day wrote:
> >Getting into this a bit more, I'm not sure this is something that
> >should be the default. For CloudServers v1.0 token auth compatibility,
> >I'm not even sure this is the best path. It seems li
On 3/3/11 5:51 PM, Eric Day wrote:
Taking this from the MP to ML for wider audience.
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:29:43PM -, Monsyne Dragon wrote:
Actually, the OpenStack API only defines compute methods, it punts on
auth currently (as it should). There is no definitive "OpenStack Auth"
docum
Taking this from the MP to ML for wider audience.
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:29:43PM -, Monsyne Dragon wrote:
> > Actually, the OpenStack API only defines compute methods, it punts on
> > auth currently (as it should). There is no definitive "OpenStack Auth"
> > document or service right now,
10 matches
Mail list logo
