Re: [Openstack] [Openstack-operators] Mailing-list split

2012-04-30 Thread Stefano Maffulli
hi Everett,

On Mon 30 Apr 2012 09:12:24 AM PDT, Everett Toews wrote:
 It's strange to me that we would take the existing mailing list
 openstack-operators and move the Ops people on it to the openstack
 list and repurpose the openstack-operators for DevOps people.

I'm lost here, I don't understand what you're proposing to do.

Let's summarize:

Thierry framed the problem:

 The traffic on the openstack@lists.launchpad.net list doubled in the
 last 4 months [3], with more users and deployers asking for information
 on OpenStack projects.

And he made a proposa to split between:

 1/ Usage, deployment, Essex / current-stable discussions
 2/ Development, contribution, Folsom / forward-looking discussions

 A new list will be created for (2) and existing contributors will be
 asked to subscribe to that new list

He said nothing about point 1. I assumed that openstack-operators is 
one of the place for discussions around usage, deployment and such 
(another place for that is the forum).

It seems to me there there is consensus to keep openstack-operators and 
forums running therefore I'll ask Todd to review the 
openstack.org/community pages (and the top navigation bar) in order to 
make these landing destinations more prominent.

Cheers,
stef

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] [Openstack-operators] Mailing-list split

2012-04-30 Thread Everett Toews
Hi Stefano,

I was replying to Duncan's email, not Thierry's. I'm all for the new
openstack-dev list.

It was Duncan's proposal that the other lists be split as so.

1. openstack-dev = Dev
2. openstack = Ops
3. openstack-operators = DevOps

I am questioning the necessity to have both lists 2 and 3. My proposal
boils down to the question, does the DevOps community really need its own
list?

I'm willing to wait until the next Summit to see what the traffic numbers
are like on the openstack and openstack-operators lists before any
decisions are made around merging them or keeping them separate. However, I
still think it's worthwhile to ask the question above.

Regards,
Everett

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.orgwrote:

 hi Everett,

 On Mon 30 Apr 2012 09:12:24 AM PDT, Everett Toews wrote:
  It's strange to me that we would take the existing mailing list
  openstack-operators and move the Ops people on it to the openstack
  list and repurpose the openstack-operators for DevOps people.

 I'm lost here, I don't understand what you're proposing to do.

 Let's summarize:

 Thierry framed the problem:

  The traffic on the openstack@lists.launchpad.net list doubled in the
  last 4 months [3], with more users and deployers asking for information
  on OpenStack projects.

 And he made a proposa to split between:

  1/ Usage, deployment, Essex / current-stable discussions
  2/ Development, contribution, Folsom / forward-looking discussions
 
  A new list will be created for (2) and existing contributors will be
  asked to subscribe to that new list

 He said nothing about point 1. I assumed that openstack-operators is
 one of the place for discussions around usage, deployment and such
 (another place for that is the forum).

 It seems to me there there is consensus to keep openstack-operators and
 forums running therefore I'll ask Todd to review the
 openstack.org/community pages (and the top navigation bar) in order to
 make these landing destinations more prominent.

 Cheers,
 stef

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] [Openstack-operators] Mailing-list split

2012-04-30 Thread Duncan McGreggor
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Everett Toews everett.to...@cybera.ca wrote:
 Hi Stefano,

 I was replying to Duncan's email, not Thierry's. I'm all for the new
 openstack-dev list.

 It was Duncan's proposal that the other lists be split as so.

 1. openstack-dev = Dev
 2. openstack = Ops
 3. openstack-operators = DevOps

To be clear, my proposal is to see how the devops community feels
about this, before deciding it's a good idea, without their input.

 I am questioning the necessity to have both lists 2 and 3. My proposal boils
 down to the question, does the DevOps community really need its own list?

As soon as it's clear that *everyone* feels this way, we should do it.
Until then, we should not make decisions that impact the community
(e.g., taking something away that may be valueable to some) without
getting their feedback and finding some way transition in a way that
keeps everyone happy.

 I'm willing to wait until the next Summit to see what the traffic numbers
 are like on the openstack and openstack-operators lists before any decisions
 are made around merging them or keeping them separate.

Agreed.

 However, I still
 think it's worthwhile to ask the question above.

Agreed.

d

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] [Openstack-operators] Mailing-list split

2012-04-30 Thread Matt Ray
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Duncan McGreggor dun...@dreamhost.com wrote:
 On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Everett Toews everett.to...@cybera.ca 
 wrote:
 Hi Stefano,

 I was replying to Duncan's email, not Thierry's. I'm all for the new
 openstack-dev list.

 It was Duncan's proposal that the other lists be split as so.

 1. openstack-dev = Dev
 2. openstack = Ops
 3. openstack-operators = DevOps
snip

I think adding the openstack-dev list will help alleviate traffic on
openstack, but we should keep 3 mailing lists. The openstack one
will probably continue to be a mix of traffic, and as new community
members become more familiar with the mailing list landscape they'll
move to the proper lists (with gentle encouragement as well). With
more visibility and encouragement, more focused operations questions
will get to the proper openstack-operators list in the future
(likewise -dev). I don't expect mailing list traffic to decrease in
the future, so reducing the number of mailing lists seems unnecessary.

Thanks,
Matt Ray
Senior Technical Evangelist | Opscode Inc.
m...@opscode.com | (512) 731-2218
Twitter, IRC, GitHub: mattray




 To be clear, my proposal is to see how the devops community feels
 about this, before deciding it's a good idea, without their input.

 I am questioning the necessity to have both lists 2 and 3. My proposal boils
 down to the question, does the DevOps community really need its own list?

 As soon as it's clear that *everyone* feels this way, we should do it.
 Until then, we should not make decisions that impact the community
 (e.g., taking something away that may be valueable to some) without
 getting their feedback and finding some way transition in a way that
 keeps everyone happy.

 I'm willing to wait until the next Summit to see what the traffic numbers
 are like on the openstack and openstack-operators lists before any decisions
 are made around merging them or keeping them separate.

 Agreed.

 However, I still
 think it's worthwhile to ask the question above.

 Agreed.

 d
 ___
 Openstack-operators mailing list
 openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] [Openstack-operators] Mailing-list split

2012-04-27 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On Fri 27 Apr 2012 02:43:14 PM PDT, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
 But if openstack-operators has become a property valuable to community
 members, we shouldn't just get rid of it because it doesn't make
 logical sense. We should make sure that folks are ready to transition
 to another location for their DevOps needs.

I agree with this approach: let's cross that bridge when we come to it. 
We should make one small change at the time, measure/evaluate and keep 
changing as needed.

thanks,
stef

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp