: [Openstack] [keystone] v3 API draft (update and questions to the
community)
On 13/06/2012, at 1:24 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
Totally agree with all of Jay's points, and I also couldn't agree more with
Mark on the importance of being crystal clear, and not operating on just a
common understanding
bounces+chrisfer=us.ibm@lists.launchpad.netDate: 06/12/2012 11:28PMSubject: Re: [Openstack] [keystone] v3 API draft (update and questions to the community)Totally agree with all of Jay's points, and I also couldn't agree more with Mark on the importance of being crystal clear, and not operating o
-Original Message-
From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:m...@mnot.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 8:43 PM
To: Gabriel Hurley
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [keystone] v3 API draft (update and questions to
the community)
On 13/06/2012, at 1:24 PM, Gabriel Hurley
Of
Mark Nottingham
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 10:27 PM
To: Joseph Heck
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net (openstack@lists.launchpad.net)
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [keystone] v3 API draft (update and questions to
the community)
On 11/06/2012, at 6:58 AM, Joseph Heck wrote:
First - what's
: Monday, June 11, 2012 10:27 PM
To: Joseph Heck
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net (openstack@lists.launchpad.net)
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [keystone] v3 API draft (update and questions to
the community)
On 11/06/2012, at 6:58 AM, Joseph Heck wrote:
First - what's the current thought
P.S. the X-Subject-Token stuff is breaking HTTP; you need to either put the
token (or a facsimile for it) in the URL, or put Vary: Subject-Token in EVERY
response those resources generate. The former is preferred; this is over TLS,
right? Sorry I didn't see that earlier.
P.P.S If it's
, 2012 10:27 PM
To: Joseph Heck
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net (openstack@lists.launchpad.net)
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [keystone] v3 API draft (update and questions to
the community)
On 11/06/2012, at 6:58 AM, Joseph Heck wrote:
First - what's the current thought of support for PATCH vs PUT
On 06/12/2012 04:24 AM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
Mark,
Apparently you must have missed my lightning talk at the Essex summit... ;-)
(http://gabrielhurley.github.com/slides/openstack/apis_like_orms/index.html)
Filtering, pagination, and many other API features are *critical* for a rich
dashboard
On 06/12/2012 12:21 PM, Adam Young wrote:
On 06/12/2012 04:24 AM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
That said, we have also considered the case you propose where you
effectively request everything and handle it on the client-side...
however, I see that as a tremendously lazy solution. On the
The X-Subject-Token solution is definitely not valid HTTP, in that it
implies that two otherwise identical requests for GET /tokens would return
two completely different results (hence the need for a Vary header, as we
include for X-Auth-Token).
I have a slightly more proper (and complicated)
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Gabriel Hurley
gabriel.hur...@nebula.com wrote:
To speak on the specific feature of pagination, the problem of 'corruption'
by simultaneous writers is no excuse for not implementing it. You think
Google, Facebook, Flickr, etc. etc. etc. don't have this
On 13/06/2012, at 3:31 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
This isn't necessarily true. Nova's compute layer goes through a number of
steps to ensure a semi-transactional nature to certain operations like
resizing. Certain times a query needs to indicate that it intends to make a
reservation of
@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Mark Nottingham
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 7:20 PM
To: Jay Pipes
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [keystone] v3 API draft (update and questions to
the community)
On 13/06/2012, at 3:31 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
This isn't
@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-
bounces+gabriel.hurley=nebula@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Mark Nottingham
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 7:20 PM
To: Jay Pipes
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [keystone] v3 API draft (update and questions to
the community)
On 13
First a thank you to everyone who's swung by to read (and some comment) on the
V3 draft at
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s9C4EMxIZ55kZr62CKEC9ip7He_Q4_g1KRfSk9hY-Sg/edit?pli=1.
It's been immensely useful.
To clear up a bit of confusion I caused (sorry Jay!) - there were *no* example
15 matches
Mail list logo
