Re: [Openstack] [Nova] removing nova-direct-api

2012-04-10 Thread Joe Gordon
Looks like a unanimous decision. Here is the blueprint. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/remove-nova-direct-api best, Joe On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Devin Carlen de...@openstack.org wrote: +1 It doesn't have to go home but it can't stay here. On Apr 9, 2012, at 12:31 PM,

[Openstack] [Nova] removing nova-direct-api

2012-04-09 Thread Joe Gordon
Hi All, The other day I noticed that in addition to EC2 and OpenStack APIs there is a third API type: nova-direct-api. As best I can tell, this was used early on for development/testing before the EC2 and OpenStack APIs were mature. My question is, since most of the code hasn't been touched in

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] removing nova-direct-api

2012-04-09 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
+1 to removal. I just tested to see if it still works, and due to our policy checking and loading objects before sending them into compute.api, it no longer functions. Probably wouldn't be too hard to fix it, but clearly no one is using it so lets axe it. Vish On Apr 9, 2012, at 11:19 AM,

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] removing nova-direct-api

2012-04-09 Thread Sandy Walsh
/me wears black armband. Would love to see DirectApi v2 be the de facto OS API implementation. The spec could be the same, it's just a (better) implementation detail. -S On 04/09/2012 03:58 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: +1 to removal. I just tested to see if it still works, and due to our

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] removing nova-direct-api

2012-04-09 Thread Kevin L. Mitchell
On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 11:58 -0700, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: +1 to removal. I just tested to see if it still works, and due to our policy checking and loading objects before sending them into compute.api, it no longer functions. Probably wouldn't be too hard to fix it, but clearly no one is

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] removing nova-direct-api

2012-04-09 Thread Devin Carlen
+1 It doesn't have to go home but it can't stay here. On Apr 9, 2012, at 12:31 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 11:58 -0700, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: +1 to removal. I just tested to see if it still works, and due to our policy checking and loading objects before sending