Re: [Openstack] Basic networking/configuration woes

2012-02-24 Thread Justin Santa Barbara
> The instance firewall should be configured to only allow DHCP > responses from the IP it believes to be the correct DHCP server. > Perhaps it has the wrong idea? Ah yes - it probably does because of my unusual network "subrange" config. It seems I'm not "missing something", so I've proposed a i

Re: [Openstack] Basic networking/configuration woes

2012-02-24 Thread Caitlin Bestler
Justin Santa Barbara wrote > > Yes, I do have a non-nova DHCP server. However, even if I didn't, and even > if iptables allowed talking to 169.254 with the magic link-local, cloud-init > still couldn't configure the IP address... :-( If Linux assigned a 169.254 address to an Ethernet port t

Re: [Openstack] Basic networking/configuration woes

2012-02-24 Thread Soren Hansen
2012/2/24 Justin Santa Barbara : > I have contributed a patch (which has merged) which should allow you > to stop editing the SQL:  https://review.openstack.org/#change,3816 > With that, you should be able to pass the full range, with an > additional argument specifying the subset that nova control

Re: [Openstack] Basic networking/configuration woes

2012-02-23 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
On Feb 23, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Justin Santa Barbara wrote: >> If you're going to go the cloud-init route... you wouldn't need DHCP, right? >> There should be iptables rules to allow you to talk to the metadata >> service over 169.254.* (And linux should give you a default link-local >> addres

Re: [Openstack] Basic networking/configuration woes

2012-02-23 Thread Justin Santa Barbara
> If you're going to go the cloud-init route... you wouldn't need DHCP, right?   > There should be iptables rules to allow you to talk to the metadata service > over 169.254.*  (And linux should give you a default link-local address that > allows you to talk to the MD service magically) > > Do y

Re: [Openstack] Basic networking/configuration woes

2012-02-23 Thread Chris Behrens
On Feb 23, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Justin Santa Barbara wrote: > Thanks for chipping in. > > I have contributed a patch (which has merged) which should allow you > to stop editing the SQL: https://review.openstack.org/#change,3816 > With that, you should be able to pass the full range, with an > addi

Re: [Openstack] Basic networking/configuration woes

2012-02-23 Thread Justin Santa Barbara
Thanks for chipping in. I have contributed a patch (which has merged) which should allow you to stop editing the SQL: https://review.openstack.org/#change,3816 With that, you should be able to pass the full range, with an additional argument specifying the subset that nova controls: e.g.-fixed_ci

Re: [Openstack] Basic networking/configuration woes

2012-02-23 Thread Chris Behrens
I'd assume FlatDHCPManager works much like FlatManager, but maybe I'm wrong. I use FlatManager and I always end up having to modify the fixed_ips table manually after running nova-manage because I think I'm trying to do something similar as you. I have a /23... and I want to give nova a /25 ou

[Openstack] Basic networking/configuration woes

2012-02-23 Thread Justin Santa Barbara
I'm trying to use OpenStack in what I think to be the typical non-public-cloud deployment, and my experience is not what it could/should be.  I'm hoping someone can point me to the "right way", or we can figure out what needs to change. My wishlist: * I want my instances to be on "my network" e.g.