Re: [Openstack] Blueprint proposal: Drop setuptools_git for including data/config files

2012-12-18 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/18/2012 12:17 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Thomas Goirand wrote: [No pun intended, but it'd be nice if stackers had a bit more consideration for our work in Debian, and stop thinking only with Ubuntu, Ubuntu, Ubuntu, Ubuntu, Ubuntu, Ubuntu, ... in mind.] There is nothing Ubuntu-specific

Re: [Openstack] Blueprint proposal: Drop setuptools_git for including data/config files

2012-12-18 Thread Thierry Carrez
Thomas Goirand wrote: On 12/18/2012 12:17 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Thomas Goirand wrote: [No pun intended, but it'd be nice if stackers had a bit more consideration for our work in Debian, and stop thinking only with Ubuntu, Ubuntu, Ubuntu, Ubuntu, Ubuntu, Ubuntu, ... in mind.] There is

Re: [Openstack] Blueprint proposal: Drop setuptools_git for including data/config files

2012-12-18 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/18/2012 05:29 PM, Sascha Peilicke wrote: On 12/17/2012 04:47 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: This means that absolutely all of our packages have to embed a patch in debian/patches to fix the wrong MANIFEST.in. We've spent quite some time on that. Or rather, should I say: it's a real time

Re: [Openstack] Blueprint proposal: Drop setuptools_git for including data/config files

2012-12-17 Thread Thierry Carrez
Thomas Goirand wrote: [No pun intended, but it'd be nice if stackers had a bit more consideration for our work in Debian, and stop thinking only with Ubuntu, Ubuntu, Ubuntu, Ubuntu, Ubuntu, Ubuntu, ... in mind.] There is nothing Ubuntu-specific in this. And nothing bzr-specific either. Fedora

Re: [Openstack] Blueprint proposal: Drop setuptools_git for including data/config files

2012-12-05 Thread Sascha Peilicke
On 12/04/2012 11:01 PM, Nah, Zhongyue wrote: Is it possible to generate a MANIFEST.in file using setuptools-git? Would that solve simplicity and efficiency? Please join the discussion on openstack-dev@. It was my mistake sending this technical proposal to this ML initially. Sent from my

[Openstack] Blueprint proposal: Drop setuptools_git for including data/config files

2012-12-04 Thread Sascha Peilicke
Currently, the majority of OpenStack components make use of the Python module setuptools_git in order to install additional configuration files. This is basically the same functionality that the MANIFEST.in file (setuptools/distribute) provides, but automatic. However, we recently discovered that

Re: [Openstack] Blueprint proposal: Drop setuptools_git for including data/config files

2012-12-04 Thread Thierry Carrez
Sascha Peilicke wrote: Currently, the majority of OpenStack components make use of the Python module setuptools_git in order to install additional configuration files. This is basically the same functionality that the MANIFEST.in file (setuptools/distribute) provides, but automatic. Note:

Re: [Openstack] Blueprint proposal: Drop setuptools_git for including data/config files

2012-12-04 Thread Nah, Zhongyue
Is it possible to generate a MANIFEST.in file using setuptools-git? Would that solve simplicity and efficiency? Sent from my iPhone On Dec 4, 2012, at 9:07 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Sascha Peilicke wrote: Currently, the majority of OpenStack components make use of the