>From: jvlcek
>Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:42:33 -0400
>
>On 07/18/2012 03:00 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>> On 07/18/2012 09:47 PM, jvlcek wrote:
>>> On 07/18/2012 01:47 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>>> On 07/17/2012 10:03 PM, jvlcek wrote:
>
> I just wanted to let
sound CIMI like CMIS in content interoperablity
+1
F
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
H. Since I am aware of the API vs implementation conversations about the
destiny/definition of openstack, I should point out that there is immense
leverage and preference for a community supported standard implementation and
code base. In fact, in my commercial role, I insist that Openstac
Justin, you touch on the area of semantics and use cases as supported by a
standard API.
The goal of a unified cloud API is to enable multiple underlying providers
(fecund market opportunity, yay!) in a manner that allows for consistent
semantic execution while enabling innovation that expands
I think CIMI will be an important interface for interoperability.
-- mark
On 2/21/12 5:59 PM, Doug Davis wrote:
David Lutterkort wrote:
> A first step to adopting DC in OpenStack would be to bundle DC with the
> OpenStack code (or make sure it's very easy to set up on the widely used
> distros
David Lutterkort wrote:
> A first step to adopting DC in OpenStack would be to bundle DC with the
> OpenStack code (or make sure it's very easy to set up on the widely used
> distros that carry OpenStack). A more involved step would be to write an
> entire OpenStack API frontend that exposes the DC
Hi,
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 11:04 -0500, Frans Thamura wrote:
> anyone know deltacloud
>
> i think this is intersting
>
> esp after OpenStack want to make their own standard vs Amazon API :)
>
> i think the foundation need to be hurry and work closely with
> Apache ;0
>
> http://www.sdtimes.com/
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:04:22 +0700
Frans Thamura wrote:
> i think the foundation need to be hurry and work closely with Apache ;0
What do you propose this "work closely with" actually mean?
What do you want Foundation actually do in this regard?
Issue a press release?
-- Pete
_
> Deltacloud already has support for OpenStack:
>
> http://deltacloud.apache.org/drivers.html
Yep, though the existing support is a thin extension over the
original deltacloud Rackspace driver, so is limited to the 1.0
version of the openstack compute API.
However work is under way on a new
On 02/21/2012 11:04 AM, Frans Thamura wrote:
> anyone know deltacloud
>
> i think this is intersting
>
> esp after OpenStack want to make their own standard vs Amazon API :)
>
> i think the foundation need to be hurry and work closely with Apache ;0
>
> http://www.sdtimes.com/APACHE_ADOPTS_NEW_
In my experience, the API is the most visible yet smallest problem of
working with different clouds.
For example, EC2 and Rackspace Cloud have completely different
approaches to volumes, such that the way you backup your VMs has to be
completely different (disk snapshot vs application level). Rac
anyone know deltacloud
i think this is intersting
esp after OpenStack want to make their own standard vs Amazon API :)
i think the foundation need to be hurry and work closely with Apache ;0
http://www.sdtimes.com/APACHE_ADOPTS_NEW_TOP_LEVEL_CLOUD_PROJECT/By_Alex_Handy/About_APACHE_and_CLOUD_an
12 matches
Mail list logo
