I attempted to create a volume from an image in cinder and was getting this
strange error, turns out it was because I had my glance servers specified as
https://glanceserver:9292
In cinder the version of images/glance.py is older than the one in nova and is
missing the ssl support additions.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Sam Morrison sorri...@gmail.com wrote:
I attempted to create a volume from an image in cinder and was getting
this strange error, turns out it was because I had my glance servers
specified as https://glanceserver:9292
In cinder the version of images/glance.py
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:36 PM, John Griffith
john.griff...@solidfire.comwrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Sam Morrison sorri...@gmail.com wrote:
I attempted to create a volume from an image in cinder and was getting
this strange error, turns out it was because I had my glance
Related to this, how do we in the future stop such code-copying from happening
in the first place?
Is it just that there needs to be a place for this (oslo?) that can be updated
more quickly, or something similar?
I'm always sorta 'weirded out' when people say that they copied some code in
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Related to this, how do we in the future stop such code-copying from
happening in the first place?
Is it just that there needs to be a place for this (oslo?) that can be
updated more quickly, or something similar?
Isn't that a lets fix the slowness instead of continue bad behavior.
Fix the root problem and don't bypass it in the first place?
Then said root problem is solved for everyone and isn't pushed into the
future (as is typically done).
On 12/11/12 5:31 PM, Huang Zhiteng winsto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Isn't that a lets fix the slowness instead of continue bad behavior.
Fix the root problem and don't bypass it in the first place?
Then said root problem is solved for everyone and isn't pushed into the
future (as is
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.comwrote:
Isn't that a lets fix the slowness instead of continue bad behavior.
Fix the root problem and don't bypass it in the first place?
Then said root problem is solved for everyone and isn't pushed into the
future (as is
8 matches
Mail list logo
