Duncan McGreggor wrote:
Given no option Bs, the simplicity of option C is most appealing to me.
Option C is actually like a B0 (single list for user/operators/general
questions), but named openstack-operators instead of openstack,
openstack-general or openstack-user[s].
I'm not a big fan of
Stefano Maffulli wrote:
I think the best option then is to clone openstack@launchpad in the new
host and leave operators as is (at least for the moment). Suboptimal,
maybe, but I believe it solves the issue at hand (consolidate lists on
one host) and doens't create extra work or stress.
I think the best option then is to clone openstack@launchpad in the new
host and leave operators as is (at least for the moment). Suboptimal,
maybe, but I believe it solves the issue at hand (consolidate lists on
one host) and doens't create extra work or stress.
If nobody stops me, I'll go on
Looks like there is general agreement. For those who are concerned about
confusion of too many lists, there are already 11 public lists at
http://lists.openstack.org. What really is missing of course, is a general
list called openstack when new people show up at lists.openstack.org. What is
hi all
there are several openstack mailing also in launchpad, will it move all to
lists.openstack.org?
F
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More
Russell Bryant wrote:
On 09/12/2012 08:56 PM, Syd (Sydney) Logan wrote:
Guess the only advantage would be to minimize the chance of someone
missing the security related messages in the noise of a heavy traffic
mailing list.
Even if there were a specialized list, I’d think you’d want to cross
It may be worth trying to write a short sentence describing the purpose of
each list. The kind of sentence new users will see when deciding which
lists to subscribe to.
Personally - I think it's going to be difficult to come up with a clear
distinction between the general and operators lists, and
I like option B because this is more clear view of the project as
we did in many opensource projects before.
Obviously the cross-posting is inevitable. the goal should limit
the number of cross-postings.
Cheers,
Dan
Option B:
openstack-u...@lists.openstack.org
On 09/13/2012 01:45 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
That would be option B2 (single user/general list, named openstack):
openst...@lists.openstack.org
openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org
openstack-...@lists.openstack.org
I think it's the clearest to avoid cross-posting...
Reminder: here
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.orgwrote:
On 09/13/2012 01:45 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
That would be option B2 (single user/general list, named openstack):
openst...@lists.openstack.org
openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org
On 09/13/2012 09:04 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org
Option C (dev, announce and operators as user/general list --no renames,
no moving stuff around, just a new description)
openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org
On 09/04/2012 09:57 AM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
Do we have information on the type/number of discussions that are
user and not operator? general and not user or operator?
well, that would be good to know. Like it would be good to understand
what sort of topics we get on each lists. From what I
My two penneth worth:
I'd be confused as to what the difference between general and operators
would be and would result in people posting to both - so that goes for
openstack@... openstack-general@... and openstack-operators@
It would seem that there is a clear distinction between development
+ 2 shekels
On Sep 12, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Kevin Jackson ke...@linuxservices.co.uk wrote:
My two penneth worth:
I'd be confused as to what the difference between general and operators
would be and would result in people posting to both - so that goes for
openstack@...
To chime in as a lurker around here, this sounds good, but why add the
security list? It seems like security specific topics would interest those
subscribed to the general list as well.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Kevin Jackson ke...@linuxservices.co.ukwrote:
My two penneth worth:
I'd be
@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
To chime in as a lurker around here, this sounds good, but why add the security
list? It seems like security specific topics would interest those subscribed to
the general list as well.
On Wed, Sep 12
Stefano Maffulli wrote:
Now, the main question is still open: where should the General mailing
list go? Anybody disagrees that we should merge this list into 'Operators'?
I think there are two options:
Option A1:
openstack-gene...@lists.openstack.org
openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org
i vote to keep this mailing list as general
+1
F
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Stefano Maffulli wrote:
Now, the main question is still open: where should the General mailing
list go? Anybody disagrees that we should merge this list into
Troy Toman wrote:
I would vote for A2. I don't see a need to replace this list.
You mean you'd just keep it the way it currently is (with the general
list hosted on launchpad ?) That would be a new option:
Option Z:
openstack@lists.launchpad.net
openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org
My apologies. I missed that detail in the rush to get through my inbox this
morning. I do think we should move off of the launchpad-based list. But, I
prefer the simpler format of just 'openstack' vs. 'openstack-general'
So, I still would vote for A2 over new option Z.
Troy
On Sep 4, 2012, at
Of the As, Option A1 in particular is my preference.
However, I've heard a lot of talk about people wanting a users and
operators list to be merged -- with enough support for that, I would
be happy with Option B.
+1
Do we have information on the type/number of discussions that are
user
On 12-08-27 08:32 PM, Andrew Clay Shafer wrote:
For exporting from Launchpad, surely someone at Canonical would be able
and willing to get that list of emails.
We can provide the mailing list pickle (Mailman 2) which contains all
the email addresses as well as preferences.
If people think
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Francis J. Lacoste
francis.laco...@canonical.com wrote:
On 12-08-27 08:32 PM, Andrew Clay Shafer wrote:
For exporting from Launchpad, surely someone at Canonical would be able
and willing to get that list of emails.
We can provide the mailing list
On 08/28/2012 08:59 AM, Francis J. Lacoste wrote:
We can provide the mailing list pickle (Mailman 2) which contains all
the email addresses as well as preferences.
That's good the hear, thanks. Canonical has always been conservative
about disclosing email addresses of Launchpad's members. Let's
At the risk of getting bad e-karma for cross posting to openstack-operators,
that might be the place to post that question. I for one disagree that we
should merge the openstack general list into
openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org and the only other vote I caught on
this thread also
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Brian Schott
brian.sch...@nimbisservices.com wrote:
At the risk of getting bad e-karma for cross posting to
openstack-operators, that might be the place to post that question. I for
one disagree that we should merge the openstack general list into
Hello folks
picking up this comment on the Development mailing list:
On Mon 27 Aug 2012 02:08:48 PM PDT, Jason Kölker wrote:
I've noticed that both this list and the old launchpad lists are being
used. Which is the correct list?
I sent the following message, with questions at the end that are
Stef,
It's pretty obvious to me that there should be a general list at
openst...@lists.openstack.org. The operators list is intended for operations
people that host OpenStack deployments, not a general OpenStack user audience.
I'd create the general openstack list, and setup a daily post to
There are at least end users, operators and developers in the OpenStack
technical ecosystem.
There are also 'OpenStack' related discussions that aren't technical in
nature.
It doesn't seem right to make the operators list a catchall.
For exporting from Launchpad, surely someone at Canonical
29 matches
Mail list logo
