Re: [Openstack] Orchestration meetings/futures

2012-02-27 Thread Jay Pipes
+1 On 02/24/2012 05:02 PM, Michael Pittaro wrote: On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Joshua Harlowharlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: How about a big session on this at the folsom summit? This is really a very important part and should be heavily discussed (to avoid the zones code problem happening

Re: [Openstack] Orchestration meetings/futures

2012-02-24 Thread Joshua Harlow
@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:openstack-bounces+sriram=computenext@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Dugger, Donald D Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 11:15 AM To: nova-orchestrat...@lists.launchpad.net Cc: openstack Subject: [Openstack] Orchestration meetings/futures All- The orchestration

Re: [Openstack] Orchestration meetings/futures

2012-02-24 Thread Michael Pittaro
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: How about a big session on this at the folsom summit? This is really a very important part and should be heavily discussed (to avoid the zones code problem happening again). -Josh +1 I would like to see a session

Re: [Openstack] Orchestration meetings/futures

2012-02-24 Thread Dugger, Donald D
, Donald D; nova-orchestrat...@lists.launchpad.net; openstack Subject: Re: [Openstack] Orchestration meetings/futures On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: How about a big session on this at the folsom summit? This is really a very important part and should

Re: [Openstack] Orchestration meetings/futures

2012-02-21 Thread Michael Pittaro
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Sriram Subramanian sri...@computenext.com wrote: +1 for the same slot and for both of your proposals/ suggestions. What is the current state of the Orchestration project - I don't see any entries in the wiki/ getting started guides. Did I look at wrong place?

[Openstack] Orchestration meetings/futures

2012-02-20 Thread Dugger, Donald D
All- The orchestration sub-group activity has dropped off since the start of the year and we need to re-evaluate what should be done in this area. There are still latency/serialization concerns that need to be addressed but people have more immediate concerns that seem to be occupying

Re: [Openstack] Orchestration meetings/futures

2012-02-20 Thread Sriram Subramanian
AM To: nova-orchestrat...@lists.launchpad.net Cc: openstack Subject: [Openstack] Orchestration meetings/futures All- The orchestration sub-group activity has dropped off since the start of the year and we need to re-evaluate what should be done in this area. There are still latency/serialization

Re: [Openstack] Orchestration meetings/futures

2012-02-20 Thread Dugger, Donald D
, Donald D Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 11:15 AM To: nova-orchestrat...@lists.launchpad.net Cc: openstack Subject: [Openstack] Orchestration meetings/futures All- The orchestration sub-group activity has dropped off since the start of the year and we need to re-evaluate what should be done

Re: [Openstack] Orchestration meetings/futures

2012-02-20 Thread Sriram Subramanian
] Orchestration meetings/futures All- The orchestration sub-group activity has dropped off since the start of the year and we need to re-evaluate what should be done in this area. There are still latency/serialization concerns that need to be addressed but people have more immediate concerns that seem