Ok dokie,
Let me see what I can do to get a 6.2 system. Thx.
On 1/24/12 1:53 PM, "Pádraig Brady" wrote:
On 01/24/2012 06:39 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Ok, I was using 6.1.
>
> Is there any reason that it isn't available for 6.1 and 6.2 (technically?)
Well it's not been tested on 6.1 currently.
On 01/24/2012 06:39 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Ok, I was using 6.1.
>
> Is there any reason that it isn’t available for 6.1 and 6.2 (technically?)
Well it's not been tested on 6.1 currently.
One issue with 6.1 is the version of libvirt is too old I think.
cheers,
Pádraig.
__
Ok, I was using 6.1.
Is there any reason that it isn't available for 6.1 and 6.2 (technically?)
It would be nice to not have to distinguish (6.1 vs 6.2) in the new devstack v2.
My guess is the list I created then was using the 6.1 repo, which may not have
those pkgs (darn it).
mirrorlist=https
Although yes package managers do know how to pick up a version, they sometimes
do this automatically with a newer version (if u leave out the version).
This then brings back the problem of how exactly do people with other
distributions know what version is going to work if the package manager se
On 01/17/2012 08:20 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
My goals were/are/(may continue to be, haha) the following:
1. Add in enough abstraction so that you can look at how each component is
installed/uninstalled/started/stopped by looking at a single file (maybe 2
files)
2. Have the ability to st
On 01/24/2012 12:35 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> So some of the issues after doing a comparison might be the following:
>
> For RHEL6 + EPEL a lot of the packages are there (yippe!).
Yes there has been lots of work in this area. See here for details:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenStack#OpenS
Forgot a couple others also, oops.
openstackx.json
python-httplib2 versions (0.7.1-1ubuntu1 vs 0.4.0-5.el6)
rabbitmq.json
Should be ok.
swift.json
python-webob versions (1.0.8-1 vs 0.9.6.1-3.el6)
python-xattr versions (0.6-1ubuntu2 vs 0.5.0-1.el6)
python-paste-deploy versions (1.5.0-2 vs 1.3.
So some of the issues after doing a comparison might be the following:
For RHEL6 + EPEL a lot of the packages are there (yippe!).
https://github.com/yahoo/Openstack-Devstack2/tree/master/conf/pkgs
Some issues which the EPEL people's might be able to resolve:
db.json
Seems ok.
general.json
eu
Working on getting that list committed ;) Hopefully today or tomorrow.
On 1/23/12 10:46 AM, "Alan Pevec" wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> No major issues preventing fedora.
>
> In fact we might have to get packages from fedora (dependencies) and get
> those into rh
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> No major issues preventing fedora.
>
> In fact we might have to get packages from fedora (dependencies) and get
> those into rhel (if possible).
>
> Or create something like grid dynamics has (a dependency repo) and use that
> for developmen
No major issues preventing fedora.
In fact we might have to get packages from fedora (dependencies) and get those
into rhel (if possible).
Or create something like grid dynamics has (a dependency repo) and use that
for development purposes for rhel *like* systems (possibly hosted by yahoo??)
Hmmm, what was the error for rabbitmq?
U should get a trace hopefully (with some stderr/stdout).
Darn commands that are supposed to be distro independent I guess really aren't.
Hmmph.
"PWD_CMD = ['rabbitmqctl', 'change_password', 'guest']"
-Josh
On 1/23/12 5:50 AM, "ikke" wrote:
On Sat,
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>
> Note rhel6 isn’t fully there yet. But in progress ;)
>
Anyone working on fedora version of it? Any known major issues
preventing it? I quickly added fedora labels next to RHEL6 in the
code, and added db.py stuff. By quick test it does nova
Note rhel6 isn't fully there yet. But in progress ;)
On 1/20/12 7:33 PM, "Sean Roberts" wrote:
Sweet. Will do next week.
~sean
On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:25 PM, "Joshua Harlow" wrote:
Re: [Openstack] Proposal for new devstack (v2?) For those that want to try it
glance
aunchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Joshua Harlow
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 9:21 PM
To: Mark McLoughlin
Cc: Andy Smith; openstack
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Proposal for new devstack (v2?)
Sweet, we are working on getting functionality for rhel and ubuntu up and going
and then hopefully some docs
ubject: Re: [Openstack] Proposal for new devstack (v2?)
Sweet, we are working on getting functionality for rhel and ubuntu up and going
and then hopefully some docs (and code comments) can be added in so other
people can know exactly what is going on (without the typical "go read the
code"
Brilliant!
From: openstack-bounces+garyk=radware@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+garyk=radware@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Joshua Harlow
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 9:21 PM
To: Mark McLoughlin
Cc: Andy Smith; openstack
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Proposal for new
I +3.14159265 that!
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Jesse Andrews wrote:
> devstack-pi (play on version numbers and python)
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Joshua Harlow
> wrote:
>> Sure, this was just a name I picked. It can be renamed to anything, works
>> for me. I just needed a name
devstack-pi (play on version numbers and python)
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Sure, this was just a name I picked. It can be renamed to anything, works
> for me. I just needed a name for a github project (and it seemed to make
> sense at the time, haha).
>
> -Josh
>
>
Sure, this was just a name I picked. It can be renamed to anything, works for
me. I just needed a name for a github project (and it seemed to make sense at
the time, haha).
-Josh
On 1/18/12 9:10 AM, "Lloyd Dewolf" wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>
> Please check
Sweet, we are working on getting functionality for rhel and ubuntu up and going
and then hopefully some docs (and code comments) can be added in so other
people can know exactly what is going on (without the typical "go read the
code" response). But the idea is the following:
Have a set of json
In this case, I must take a step forward and start planing Debian support asap.
Ghe Rivero
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
> Serious kudos to you guys on this part. IMHO, having a devstack that
> supports multiple distros is a massive win for OpenStack generally.
>
> H
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>
> Please check it out @ https://github.com/yahoo/Openstack-Devstack2
To stave off confusion it might be a good idea to rename this from "2"
to "alt" or similar, or even as forks tend to in the WordPress world
"ultimate" or "all in one" ;-)
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 11:20 -0800, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> My goals were/are/(may continue to be, haha) the following:
...
> 3. Have the ability to have pkg/pip installation (and definition
> separate from the main code, already starting to be done), in more
> than 1 distro.
> * This allows
I think this can be done, sure.
Its basically abstracting away how actually execute commands (ie going throw
fabric instead of the shell...).
Which I think can be accomplished.
On 1/17/12 11:18 AM, "Jesse Andrews" wrote:
I think a goal would be to have easy fabric integration.
Right now our
; -Original Message-
> From: openstack-bounces+dedutta=cisco@lists.launchpad.net
> [mailto:openstack-bounces+dedutta=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
> Jesse Andrews
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 11:19 AM
> To: Joshua Harlow
> Cc: Andy Smith; Ken Thomas
> Jesse Andrews
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 11:19 AM
> To: Joshua Harlow
> Cc: Andy Smith; Ken Thomas; openstack
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Proposal for new devstack (v2?)
>
> I think a goal would be to have easy fabric integration.
>
> Right now our fabric scripts f
@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Jesse Andrews
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 11:19 AM
To: Joshua Harlow
Cc: Andy Smith; Ken Thomas; openstack
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Proposal for new devstack (v2?)
I think a goal would be to have easy fabric integration.
Right now our fabric scripts for
My goals were/are/(may continue to be, haha) the following:
1. Add in enough abstraction so that you can look at how each component is
installed/uninstalled/started/stopped by looking at a single file (maybe 2
files)
2. Have the ability to start/stop in different manners (not always screen)
I think a goal would be to have easy fabric integration.
Right now our fabric scripts for devstack look like:
@task
@parallel
def stop():
"""Kill devstack and all VMs running"""
run("killall -9 screen || true")
run("screen -wipe || true")
# note we can probably remove this once d
Thx,
Yes we haven't been 100% doing the style stuff yet (which is ok I think for
now).
My idea for not using an underlying fabric was just to keep it as simple as
possible (but not to simple). Not always an easy choice :-)
On 1/17/12 10:56 AM, "Andy Smith" wrote:
Looks cool :)
I've been try
Looks cool :)
I've been trying to plant the seed of switching devstack to python (heavily
utilizing fabric and cuisine) in my team's head for a while now.
We are heavily dependent on devstack for our development and testing
workflows so it would be a pretty big decision for us to switch tools, an
Hi all,
I would just like to propose a new devstack (v2?) that we have been starting to
work on that uses python throughout as well as has componentized installs (for
glance, nova...) and a nice object oriented design and the like (including
having a json format for defining package and pip dep
33 matches
Mail list logo
