While I understand the reasons for which the RequestExtensions scheme might
be preferred over the resource extension one, I was wondering whether
assigning namespaces to attributes could be a solution to the XML
issue. This would clearly separate core attributes from extended ones.
Bob, can you
Adding main openstack list, as hopefully someone there can common on
implementing Request Extensions using XML.
I personally think that Request Extensions are a cleaner approach, but it
would seem silly to claim support for two serialization types, but expose
some API extension that work only
2 matches
Mail list logo
