> I pinged Anne Gentle about the docs missing this (apparently
> core) API server action and she will be working to get this added to the
> current docs -- especially since novaclient already has support for it...
Good good.
> The more I think about it, I believe a single migration API would be s
On 07/09/2012 10:09 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
>>> - historically XenAPI had migrate, Libvirt had live migrate
>>> - But by end of Folsom we should have both having both
>>
>> Yes, but what is the difference between the two?
> Got you. I think this is right:
>
> Migration:
> - shutdown the VM
> - mov
> > - historically XenAPI had migrate, Libvirt had live migrate
> > - But by end of Folsom we should have both having both
>
> Yes, but what is the difference between the two?
Got you. I think this is right:
Migration:
- shutdown the VM
- move current disk to the destination
- start VM
- user see
On 07/09/2012 09:35 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
> Renuka and I are looking at proposing a blueprint to try and sort out some of
> this confusion.
>
> I think this is the current situation:
> - historically XenAPI had migrate, Libvirt had live migrate
> - But by end of Folsom we should have both havin
Hi,
> There are currently no tests for live migration. I imagine that the reason is
> because there is very poor documentation on the os-migrateLive API
> extension. I'd be happy to help you in writing the tests.
Cool, thanks.
> I'd love some help in identifying some documentation
> ...
> we need
5 matches
Mail list logo