Todd, Mike -
This looks great! From the looks of things, the main difference seem to be
slight changes due to the fact that dom0 is ubuntu, rather than redhat. Is
that accurate? If so, it seems like it should be straightforward to
support both with roughly the same code, and just if-else the
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Anthony Young
sleepsonthefl...@gmail.com wrote:
This looks great! From the looks of things, the main difference seem to be
slight changes due to the fact that dom0 is ubuntu, rather than redhat. Is
that accurate? If so, it seems like it should be
On 21/02/12 17:51, Anthony Young wrote:
Todd, Mike -
This looks great! From the looks of things, the main difference seem to
be slight changes due to the fact that dom0 is ubuntu, rather than
redhat. Is that accurate?
Yes, that's basically it. There is much less to do in
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Anthony Young
sleepsonthefl...@gmail.com wrote:
This looks great! From the looks of things, the main difference seem to be
slight changes due to the fact that dom0 is ubuntu, rather than
Hi Jesse and Anthony,
Mike McClurg has a devstack branch that implements support for
devstack on Debian/Ubuntu + the XCP toolstack [1]. Bascially, you can
take a Debian/Ubuntu system with the xcp-xapi package installed and
configured [2] and then run the devstack xcp-toolstack branch
(specially
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Todd Deshane todd.desh...@xen.org wrote:
Hi Jesse and Anthony,
Mike McClurg has a devstack branch that implements support for
devstack on Debian/Ubuntu + the XCP toolstack [1]. Bascially, you can
take a Debian/Ubuntu system with the xcp-xapi package installed
6 matches
Mail list logo
