Re: [Openstack] growing fixed-ip network

2012-08-03 Thread Christoph Kluenter
* Am Thu, Aug 02 2012 at 09:24:55 -0400 , schrieb Ravi Jagannathan:
 It should hop on to the next subnet block if available 
Since openstack doesn't do this, its just not possible to
grow grow the network ? 


Christoph

 
 Ravi
 
 On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Christoph Kluenter c...@iphh.net wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  I don't know how to handle the case when a tenant has used up all IPs.
  We use FlatNetworking, so no Floating IPs possible.
  So, when one tenant has used up all the IPs in their net, how can I assign
  another net
  to the same tenant ? If I just assign another net, every new instance just
  gets an IP from both nets.
  But if the first net doesn't have free IPs, I get the
   exception.NoMoreFixedIps()
  even if the second net still has lots of IPs.
 
  Can this be solved with quantum ?
 
  Cheers,
Christoph
  --
  Christoph Kluenter   E-Mail: supp...@iphh.net
  Technik  Tel: +49 (0)40 374919-10
  IPHH Internet Port Hamburg GmbH  Fax: +49 (0)40 374919-29
  Wendenstrasse 408AG Hamburg, HRB 76071
  D-20537 Hamburg  Geschaeftsfuehrung: Axel G. Kroeger
 
  ___
  Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
  Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
 

-- 
Christoph Kluenter   E-Mail: supp...@iphh.net
Technik  Tel: +49 (0)40 374919-10
IPHH Internet Port Hamburg GmbH  Fax: +49 (0)40 374919-29
Wendenstrasse 408AG Hamburg, HRB 76071
D-20537 Hamburg  Geschaeftsfuehrung: Axel G. Kroeger

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] growing fixed-ip network

2012-08-03 Thread Ravi Jagannathan
clarify more. By growing network do you mean adding more machine machines
instances  ?

On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Christoph Kluenter c...@iphh.net wrote:

 * Am Thu, Aug 02 2012 at 09:24:55 -0400 , schrieb Ravi Jagannathan:
  It should hop on to the next subnet block if available
 Since openstack doesn't do this, its just not possible to
 grow grow the network ?


 Christoph

 
  Ravi
 
  On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Christoph Kluenter c...@iphh.net wrote:
 
   Hi,
  
   I don't know how to handle the case when a tenant has used up all IPs.
   We use FlatNetworking, so no Floating IPs possible.
   So, when one tenant has used up all the IPs in their net, how can I
 assign
   another net
   to the same tenant ? If I just assign another net, every new instance
 just
   gets an IP from both nets.
   But if the first net doesn't have free IPs, I get the
exception.NoMoreFixedIps()
   even if the second net still has lots of IPs.
  
   Can this be solved with quantum ?
  
   Cheers,
 Christoph
   --
   Christoph Kluenter   E-Mail: supp...@iphh.net
   Technik  Tel: +49 (0)40 374919-10
   IPHH Internet Port Hamburg GmbH  Fax: +49 (0)40 374919-29
   Wendenstrasse 408AG Hamburg, HRB 76071
   D-20537 Hamburg  Geschaeftsfuehrung: Axel G.
 Kroeger
  
   ___
   Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
   Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
   Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
   More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
  

 --
 Christoph Kluenter   E-Mail: supp...@iphh.net
 Technik  Tel: +49 (0)40 374919-10
 IPHH Internet Port Hamburg GmbH  Fax: +49 (0)40 374919-29
 Wendenstrasse 408AG Hamburg, HRB 76071
 D-20537 Hamburg  Geschaeftsfuehrung: Axel G. Kroeger

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] growing fixed-ip network

2012-08-03 Thread Christoph Kluenter
* Am Fri, Aug 03 2012 at 07:57:03 -0400 , schrieb Ravi Jagannathan:
 clarify more. By growing network do you mean adding more machine machines
 instances  ?
More instances. The tenant has used up the first net, has 254 instances running 
and now wants to add
more instances. But since the net is full, it has to be another net. But this 
does not work.

Cheers,
 Christoph
 
 On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Christoph Kluenter c...@iphh.net wrote:
 
  * Am Thu, Aug 02 2012 at 09:24:55 -0400 , schrieb Ravi Jagannathan:
   It should hop on to the next subnet block if available
  Since openstack doesn't do this, its just not possible to
  grow grow the network ?
 
 
  Christoph
 
  
   Ravi
  
   On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Christoph Kluenter c...@iphh.net wrote:
  
Hi,
   
I don't know how to handle the case when a tenant has used up all IPs.
We use FlatNetworking, so no Floating IPs possible.
So, when one tenant has used up all the IPs in their net, how can I
  assign
another net
to the same tenant ? If I just assign another net, every new instance
  just
gets an IP from both nets.
But if the first net doesn't have free IPs, I get the
 exception.NoMoreFixedIps()
even if the second net still has lots of IPs.
   
Can this be solved with quantum ?
   
Cheers,
  Christoph
--
Christoph Kluenter   E-Mail: supp...@iphh.net
Technik  Tel: +49 (0)40 374919-10
IPHH Internet Port Hamburg GmbH  Fax: +49 (0)40 374919-29
Wendenstrasse 408AG Hamburg, HRB 76071
D-20537 Hamburg  Geschaeftsfuehrung: Axel G.
  Kroeger
   
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
   
 
  --
  Christoph Kluenter   E-Mail: supp...@iphh.net
  Technik  Tel: +49 (0)40 374919-10
  IPHH Internet Port Hamburg GmbH  Fax: +49 (0)40 374919-29
  Wendenstrasse 408AG Hamburg, HRB 76071
  D-20537 Hamburg  Geschaeftsfuehrung: Axel G. Kroeger
 
  ___
  Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
  Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
 

-- 
Christoph Kluenter   E-Mail: supp...@iphh.net
Technik  Tel: +49 (0)40 374919-10
IPHH Internet Port Hamburg GmbH  Fax: +49 (0)40 374919-29
Wendenstrasse 408AG Hamburg, HRB 76071
D-20537 Hamburg  Geschaeftsfuehrung: Axel G. Kroeger

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Openstack] growing fixed-ip network

2012-08-02 Thread Christoph Kluenter
Hi,

I don't know how to handle the case when a tenant has used up all IPs.
We use FlatNetworking, so no Floating IPs possible.
So, when one tenant has used up all the IPs in their net, how can I assign 
another net
to the same tenant ? If I just assign another net, every new instance just gets 
an IP from both nets.
But if the first net doesn't have free IPs, I get the  
exception.NoMoreFixedIps()
even if the second net still has lots of IPs.

Can this be solved with quantum ?

Cheers,
  Christoph
-- 
Christoph Kluenter   E-Mail: supp...@iphh.net
Technik  Tel: +49 (0)40 374919-10
IPHH Internet Port Hamburg GmbH  Fax: +49 (0)40 374919-29
Wendenstrasse 408AG Hamburg, HRB 76071
D-20537 Hamburg  Geschaeftsfuehrung: Axel G. Kroeger

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] growing fixed-ip network

2012-08-02 Thread Ravi Jagannathan
It should hop on to the next subnet block if available ( assuming that in
LAN its a private address scheme ) .

Ravi

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Christoph Kluenter c...@iphh.net wrote:

 Hi,

 I don't know how to handle the case when a tenant has used up all IPs.
 We use FlatNetworking, so no Floating IPs possible.
 So, when one tenant has used up all the IPs in their net, how can I assign
 another net
 to the same tenant ? If I just assign another net, every new instance just
 gets an IP from both nets.
 But if the first net doesn't have free IPs, I get the
  exception.NoMoreFixedIps()
 even if the second net still has lots of IPs.

 Can this be solved with quantum ?

 Cheers,
   Christoph
 --
 Christoph Kluenter   E-Mail: supp...@iphh.net
 Technik  Tel: +49 (0)40 374919-10
 IPHH Internet Port Hamburg GmbH  Fax: +49 (0)40 374919-29
 Wendenstrasse 408AG Hamburg, HRB 76071
 D-20537 Hamburg  Geschaeftsfuehrung: Axel G. Kroeger

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] growing fixed-ip network

2012-08-02 Thread Christoph Kluenter
* Am Thu, Aug 02 2012 at 09:24:55 -0400 , schrieb Ravi Jagannathan:
 It should hop on to the next subnet block if available ( assuming that in
 LAN its a private address scheme ) .
We only use routable IPs. thats why we have some nets which can't be subnetted.
What difference does it make if its private adress space ?

christoph
 
 Ravi
 
 On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Christoph Kluenter c...@iphh.net wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  I don't know how to handle the case when a tenant has used up all IPs.
  We use FlatNetworking, so no Floating IPs possible.
  So, when one tenant has used up all the IPs in their net, how can I assign
  another net
  to the same tenant ? If I just assign another net, every new instance just
  gets an IP from both nets.
  But if the first net doesn't have free IPs, I get the
   exception.NoMoreFixedIps()
  even if the second net still has lots of IPs.
 
  Can this be solved with quantum ?
 
  Cheers,
Christoph
  --
  Christoph Kluenter   E-Mail: supp...@iphh.net
  Technik  Tel: +49 (0)40 374919-10
  IPHH Internet Port Hamburg GmbH  Fax: +49 (0)40 374919-29
  Wendenstrasse 408AG Hamburg, HRB 76071
  D-20537 Hamburg  Geschaeftsfuehrung: Axel G. Kroeger
 
  ___
  Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
  Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
 

-- 
Christoph Kluenter   E-Mail: supp...@iphh.net
Technik  Tel: +49 (0)40 374919-10
IPHH Internet Port Hamburg GmbH  Fax: +49 (0)40 374919-29
Wendenstrasse 408AG Hamburg, HRB 76071
D-20537 Hamburg  Geschaeftsfuehrung: Axel G. Kroeger

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] growing fixed-ip network

2012-08-02 Thread Narayan Desai
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Christoph Kluenter c...@iphh.net wrote:
 * Am Thu, Aug 02 2012 at 09:24:55 -0400 , schrieb Ravi Jagannathan:
 It should hop on to the next subnet block if available ( assuming that in
 LAN its a private address scheme ) .
 We only use routable IPs. thats why we have some nets which can't be 
 subnetted.
 What difference does it make if its private adress space ?

The major reason to use private address space is that there is likely
a lot more of it than you have in public address space. if you have
effectively unlimited fixed_ip space, you can give each project a lot.
For example, we give each project a /23. While a user could
potentially still run out of address space on our system, it hasn't
happened yet with our workload.
 -nld

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] growing fixed-ip network

2012-08-02 Thread Ravi Jagannathan
Also.. builds are better created in Private IP and then prepped to release
to Public cloud. After all just an instance rinning OS is not yet there in
terms of APP stack.

Ravi.

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Narayan Desai narayan.de...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Christoph Kluenter c...@iphh.net wrote:
  * Am Thu, Aug 02 2012 at 09:24:55 -0400 , schrieb Ravi Jagannathan:
  It should hop on to the next subnet block if available ( assuming that
 in
  LAN its a private address scheme ) .
  We only use routable IPs. thats why we have some nets which can't be
 subnetted.
  What difference does it make if its private adress space ?

 The major reason to use private address space is that there is likely
 a lot more of it than you have in public address space. if you have
 effectively unlimited fixed_ip space, you can give each project a lot.
 For example, we give each project a /23. While a user could
 potentially still run out of address space on our system, it hasn't
 happened yet with our workload.
  -nld

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp