On 07/14/2015 01:46 PM, Abhishek Shrivastava wrote:
Instead of it use reusable_node option.
Thanks. Problem resolved. :)
BTW, single_use_node is written in layout.yaml by default.
If it doesn't exist anymore, do we need a patch to fix it ?
For someone who uses CI for the first time, it is
Also if you want to change it you will need to talk with Asselin Ramy who
is the owner of the repo you followed.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Abhishek Shrivastava
abhis...@cloudbyte.com wrote:
Basically it is not required, and if you see /etc/jenkins_jobs/config
folder you will find one
Hi, all:
Here is a requirement: deny/permit incoming packets on VM by mac addresses,
I have tried to find better method than modifying neutron code, but failed.
Any suggesion is grateful. Thank you.
Yan.
yan_xing...@163.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys,
first of all, sorry for this cross post but it seems very critical:
https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/78403/swift-broken-pipe/
I'm running in a very strange issue if i'm using ssbench to test my cluster.
* Swift 2.2.2
* 2 Proxy
Hi:All I noticed that there are many error logs in my openvswitch-agent.log
of network node. for
example:=2015-07-14
03:28:45.256 5934 ERROR root [-] Unexpected exception occurred 61
Hi Ivan,
XenAPINFSDriver was primarily useful for pooled scenarios (which in turn relied
on Nova aggregates) - however it's not the easiest way to consume Cinder
volumes. The XenServer Nova integration supports BFV and volume attach for
Cinder volumes presented over iSCSI, so however those
On 07/13/2015 08:44 PM, Igor Yozhikov wrote:
Hello everyone.
During the Liberty summit in Vancouver, the idea to maintain OpenStack
packages for Debian and Ubuntu on upstream infra sparked. As part of the
Openstack and Debian community we still want to push for it. Instead of trying
to
Doug, Terry.
Thank you for the feedback.
I will create a BP with list of desired public methods and will add all
projects to it.
Regards,
Sergey.
On 9 July 2015 at 21:20, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Sergey Kraynev's message of 2015-07-09 18:26:09 +0300:
Hi
I just saw this Nova review come in -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200908
Why are we merging 2.6 requirements for projects that don't support 2.6?
That seems potentially confusing to end users that now think the project
does, because there are still references in the code.
-Sean
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/14/2015 01:46 AM, Perry, Sean wrote:
-Original Message- From: Doug Hellmann
[mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 3:41
PM To: openstack-dev Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Time to
remove Python2.6 jobs from
We want to try hierarchical port binding for some TOR vtep. However it
seems that the patch [1] could not be applied directly onto JUNO
release. So are there any other patch needed when merging this patch?
Thanks a lot!
[1]
Hi,
Please note, the non-priority feature freeze is on: July 30
Blueprint assignees (as always, but especially now), please update
your blueprint to:
* NeedsCodeReview, once all your code ready for review
* Implemented, once all your code has merged
Not doing this, will force me to guess
Do you have your nova deployment divided up in a way that means Neutron
might be trying to send events to a Nova API server that doesn't know about
that instance?
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Chris cont...@progbau.de wrote:
Hello Matt,
The errors are shown in the neutron server log on our
Oh, no I didn't. By the time I got around to it I saw 264 and figured that
would cover the issue.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 10 July 2015 at 22:07, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
No prob. The fixes for Neutron were relatively
Hi,
It is possible to setup in FWaaS DNAT rule?
Thanks.
Peter
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe :
On Tuesday 14 of July 2015 10:33:18 Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
On 07/14/2015 01:46 AM, Perry, Sean wrote:
-Original Message- From: Doug Hellmann
I don't *want* to keep 2.6 support around, and I do understand
that the requirements work will be made easier. I'm just trying
to
Markus Zoeller/Germany/IBM@IBMDE wrote on 07/10/2015 03:55
[...]
So you have a bunch of bugs that are Confirmed (or Triaged) + an
assignee set. I would argue that you need to separate two cases:
the bug had no activity for the last 60 days: assignee should be
removed
the bug had
Unfortunately the security groups API does not have mac-level rules right
now.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:17 AM, yan_xing...@163.com yan_xing...@163.com
wrote:
Hi, all:
Here is a requirement: deny/permit incoming packets on VM by mac addresses,
I have tried to find better method than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/14/2015 12:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I missed this announce...
On 07/02/2015 05:32 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
Per the Icehouse EOL discussion[1] last month, now that the
final 2014.1.5 release[2] is behind us I have followed our usual
Gosha,
Could you please elaborate what do you mean by extra blocks? Glance V3
comes with Glance out-of-the box, no extra deployment is needed. The only
thing one will have to install is Murano Package Type plugin - but it will
be installed at the same time with Murano.
--
Regards,
Alexander
On 10 July 2015 at 19:08, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 7/7/2015 12:35 PM, John Garbutt wrote:
Hi,
Friday is: non-priority feature review bash day
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Liberty_Release_Schedule#Dates_overview
The idea is the whole nova community is
I am +1 on this SFE.
Dynamic Policy team has been working hard on this and they will for sure
deliver nice features for Liberty.
-- Marek Denis [marek.de...@cern.ch]
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
We search for a DNS solution in our Icehouse Openstack platform. Moving to
a new version of Openstack is not possible now due to the cost of migration.
Is it possible to use latest version (master) of Designate with Icehouse
openstack?
We've played a bit with Designate and it would satisfy our
Hi!
It looks like novaclient still supports py26 :) At least, there is a
gate-python-novaclient-python26 job.
Also, I checked several commands(boot, *list, delete ) with python 2.6 env
and they work as expected for me.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
I just saw
Thanks for the suggestion Jeremy, but where to put this *PIP_UPGRADE=True*
parameter?
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-07-14 17:42:12 +0530 (+0530), Abhishek Shrivastava wrote:
During my CI run I see the following error due to which the
On 2015-07-14 18:11:01 +0530 (+0530), Abhishek Shrivastava wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion Jeremy, but where to put this
*PIP_UPGRADE=True* parameter?
Add it to your localrc, run once (there's a good chance DevStack
will fail for other reasons, but it will hopefully upgrade to later
versions
no-brainer: +1
Op 14-07-15 om 13:19 schreef Ryan Hallisey:
+1 I echo all the prior comments.
-Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Monday, July
On 2015-07-14 07:03:34 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
I just saw this Nova review come in -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200908
Why are we merging 2.6 requirements for projects that don't support 2.6?
That seems potentially confusing to end users that now think the project
does,
On 07/14/2015 08:32 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-07-14 07:03:34 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
I just saw this Nova review come in -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200908
Why are we merging 2.6 requirements for projects that don't support 2.6?
That seems potentially confusing to end
On 2015-07-14 08:38:57 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
There is trove classification in the projects themselves right?
[...]
That seems like it should be enough information to know the 2.6 question.
I got to thinking through what this might look like, and while
filtering down the markers based
Thank you, Kevin.
I search the blueprint about this point in launchpad.net, and got nothing, then
register one at:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/security-group-mac-rule
Yan Xing'an
From: Kevin Benton
Date: 2015-07-14 18:31
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
On 07/14/2015 08:11 AM, Andrey Kurilin wrote:
Hi!
It looks like novaclient still supports py26 :) At least, there is a
gate-python-novaclient-python26 job.
Also, I checked several commands(boot, *list, delete ) with python 2.6
env and they work as expected for me.
Ah, right fair, my bad. I
Dear colleagues,
New repository [1] has been created. So, please port all your review
requests to stackforge/fuel-web related to Fuel Agent to this new
repository. Currently, I am testing these two patches
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200595
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200025. If they
On 2015-07-14 08:38:57 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
There is trove classification in the projects themselves right?
[...]
That seems like it should be enough information to know the 2.6 question.
Only if it's kept up to date. If we're going to rely on it (not a
terrible idea) then we should
+1 I echo all the prior comments.
-Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 10:40:11 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposal
On 07/10/2015 12:19 AM, Walter A. Boring IV wrote:
On 07/09/2015 12:21 PM, Tomoki Sekiyama wrote:
Hi all,
Just FYI, here is a sample script I'm using for testing os-brick which
attaches/detaches the cinder volume to the host using cinderclient and
os-brick:
Alexander, do you plan to update the https://review.openstack.org/#/c/140402/
versioning spec? We can possibly try to make it a joint effort, if you like.
--
Kirill Zaitsev
Murano team
Software Engineer
Mirantis, Inc
On 14 Jul 2015 at 11:34:56, Alexander Tivelkov (ativel...@mirantis.com)
I haven't had a chance to review this patch in detail yet, but am
wondering if this is being integrated with ML2 as an extension driver?
If so, that should clearly address how dictionaries are extended and
input values are validated. If not, why?
-Bob
On 7/13/15 10:50 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo
On 7/13/15, 16:19, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Ian Cordasco wrote:
On 7/13/15, 15:09, Dave Walkerem...@daviey.com wrote:
On 13 Jul 2015 8:52 pm, Ian Cordascoian.corda...@rackspace.com
wrote:
On 7/13/15, 03:38, Thierry Carrezthie...@openstack.org wrote:
SNIP
By
Hi all,
Renamed the thread to get some topics in the subject, and I wanted to bring
this review to everyone's attention.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201160/
I will reconsider these guidelines based on feedback. That said, I have
done the legwork to ask about legal guidance and I still
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2015-07-14 13:08:46 +:
On 2015-07-14 08:38:57 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
There is trove classification in the projects themselves right?
[...]
That seems like it should be enough information to know the 2.6 question.
I got to thinking
I'm wondering about the same...
On 14 July 2015 at 06:42, Peter Kardoš peter.kard...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It is possible to setup in FWaaS DNAT rule?
Thanks.
Peter
___
Mailing list:
At one point Robert proposed that we change the policy for approving
constraint changes like https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201408/ to
allow a single reviewer to approve it, assuming the tests were green.
Is that our current policy, or are we waiting for the integration of
constraints with our
Well, we are migrating from cloudstack now and it has this feature
So, do I understand It right. In current situation I cannot use data disk's at
local storages at all?
The only solution is to make additional layer through cinder+lvm and share
cinder vols through iscsi?
Do you know what's the
We are pleased to announce the release of:
futurist 0.1.2: Useful additions to futures, from the future.
This release is part of the liberty release series.
With source available at:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/futurist
With package available at:
+1
From: Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.commailto:std...@cisco.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, July 13, 2015 at 7:40 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
I don't understand the CloudStack case for data disks; but in OpenStack you
should look at ephemeral storage - see the flavour definition at
http://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ops/content/flavors.html
This will allow you to have a main disk and a data disk visible to the VM;
however it is not
On 07/14/2015 11:08 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
On 7/13/15, 16:19, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Ian Cordasco wrote:
On 7/13/15, 15:09, Dave Walkerem...@daviey.com wrote:
On 13 Jul 2015 8:52 pm, Ian Cordascoian.corda...@rackspace.com
wrote:
On 7/13/15, 03:38, Thierry
Well that is unanimous. Welcome to the core team Paul!
Regards
-steve
From: Daneyon Hansen (danehans)
daneh...@cisco.commailto:daneh...@cisco.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Thanks very much all it's a privilege. Look forward to continuing to
help out as much as possible; please feel free to drop me a line on IRC
or email any time.
-Paul
On 14/07/15 17:01, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Well that is unanimous. Welcome to the core team Paul!
Regards
-steve
From:
I would like to federate keystone with an IdP that has SSO to let those
user access Swift without duplicating any information on the keystone
database (I would install OpenStack with just keystone and Swift).
I have two questions about this.
1) Is there any good resource explaining how to
Hi Venkat,
I'm using Helium SR2 as it is suggested in the wiki.
So you suggest to use Lithium or it is a negligible problem?
Thanks.
Silvia
2015-07-13 21:04 GMT+02:00 Venkatrangan G - ERS, HCL Tech
venkatrang...@hcl.com:
Hi Silvia,
It is enough to just stack again. To provide more info,
Thanks for the hint, Ramy!
I did talk about this a longer time ago in the 3rdParty weekly but it was
hard to for people to help as it was an issue quite specific to our setup.
On other occasions, however, that meeting has been greatly helpful and I
recommend it, too!
Silvan
2015-07-07 6:01
Hello Cinder Community!
I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for change [1], re-adding the
Quobyte driver to Cinder.
The driver was removed in change [2] due to missing CI activity [3], it was
originally added in the kilo release [4].
We've been able to remove the CI's issues and it
On 07/10/2015 02:25 PM, Kevin Carter wrote:
To be clear the present OSAD project really has no intention to bring
package based installations of OpenStack. We'd certainly not reject
the idea and wouldn't mind having an implementation spec for it
but all of our current tooling and design
On 07/13/2015 09:23 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
Hello Puppet masters!
Here's an initial agenda for our weekly meeting, tomorrow at 1500 UTC
in #openstack-meeting-4:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20150714
Please add additional items you'd like
We decided during our weekly meeting that the Sprint will happen
virtually on IRC on Wed 9/2 – Fri 9/4.
We will use #openstack-sprint (freenode) IRC channel and Google Hangout
/ Bluejeans if needed.
We made progress on defining an agenda:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-liberty-mid-cycle
So, do I understand it right - I can't get rid of additional layer for cinder
volumes, if I want to use local storage?
Regards,
IT engineer
Farheap, Russia
Ivan Derbenev
From: Bob Ball [mailto:bob.b...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 12:34 PM
To: Ivan Derbenev;
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 01:56:16PM +0200, Harm Weites wrote:
no-brainer: +1
Op 14-07-15 om 13:19 schreef Ryan Hallisey:
+1 I echo all the prior comments.
-Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Basically it is not required, and if you see /etc/jenkins_jobs/config
folder you will find one dsvm-cinder-tempest.yaml which is to be used
basically not examples.yaml. So its not an issue.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Tang Chen tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On 07/14/2015 01:46 PM,
Hi,
I am Dhvanan and I and am new to OpenStack, I wanted to know if there is a
way to make multiple concurrent compute requests through the nova-api. It
would be great if someone would help me out with this!
Cheers,
Dhvanan
___
Mailing list:
As I understand it Cinder provides volumes that must be accessible to VMs on
any of the hosts - i.e. must be accessed over the network. Therefore if you
want to use Cinder to provide data volumes (or BFV) then you need a VM/physical
machine/storage array providing the actual storage which is
Hey Jamie,
Yes - Last I checked, this should work just fine.
Thanks,
Kiall
On 14/07/15 12:12, Jaime Fernández wrote:
We search for a DNS solution in our Icehouse Openstack platform. Moving
to a new version of Openstack is not possible now due to the cost of
migration.
Is it possible to
Ok, well...
I don't have the reason to use precisely Cinder.
What I need is the ability to create, delete and attach data volumes to
instances. As far as I know I can't do it without Cinder.
If you can show me a path how to do it, and use local storages only - that
would be really great
Hi Ivan,
In that case then no, I don't believe what you are trying to achieve is
currently possible with OpenStack. My understanding is that detachable block
storage is provided only by Cinder and Cinder must be network-attached storage
as there is no concept of tying the storage to
Hi,
I've setup an OpenStack IceHouse deployment with SSL.
The Ceilometer service is registered in Keystone with the https endpoints:
[root@controller-01 ~]# keystone endpoint-list|grep 8777
| 8c12e36a75454c5da92ac146630a7022 | regionOne |
https://cloud-areapd-test.pd.infn.it:8777 |
Hi All,
We still have a lack of quorum today do to summer holidays, so we're postponing
until everyone is back.
p
Peter J. Pouliot CISSP
Microsoft Enterprise Cloud Solutions
C:\OpenStack
New England Research Development Center
1 Memorial Drive
Cambridge, MA 02142
P: 1.(857).4536436
E:
I’d be good submitting it to the neutron-lbaas repo, under a horizon/
directory. We can iterate there, and talk with the Horizon team about how best
to integrate. Would that work?
Thanks,
doug
On Jul 13, 2015, at 3:05 PM, Jain, Vivek vivekj...@ebay.com wrote:
Hi German,
We integrated UI
inline...
On 7/8/15, 8:23 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya bdobre...@mirantis.com wrote:
On 6/12/15, 3:55 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
I think you missed it is not tested in the gate as a root cause for
some of the ambiguity. Anecdotes and bug reports are super important
for
knowing
Hello! Our next OpenStack App Catalog meeting will take place this
Thursday July 16th at 17:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3
The agenda can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/app-catalog
Please add agenda items if there's anything specific you would like to
discuss. For this
Hi All,
I just wanted to share where all of the TOSCA reference material is
accessible. It is maintained through an OASIS TC here -
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=tosca
The latest relevant spec is available here -
Hello! Our next OpenStack App Catalog meeting will take place this
Thursday July 16th at 17:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3
The agenda can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/app-catalog
Please add agenda items if there's anything specific you would like to
discuss. For this
Team,
Thanks everyone for your feedback. The Magnum Midcycle for the Liberty release
will be held on 2015-08-05 and 2015-08-06. I look forward to seeing you all
there.
Regards,
Adrian Otto
On Jul 1, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Steven Dake (stdake)
std...@cisco.commailto:std...@cisco.com wrote:
Can we setup a short IRC meeting to sync up on details? 1600utc on thursday,
maybe? Other?
Thanks,
doug
On Jul 13, 2015, at 4:02 PM, Praveen Yalagandula yprav...@avinetworks.com
wrote:
Hi Vivek,
I can help on this effort. Thanks for leading this!
We had done some work to add
Another option is to create a project under openstack.
designate-dashboard project takes this approach,
and the core team of the project is both horizon-core and designate-core.
We can do the similar approach. Thought?
I have one question.
Do we have a separate place forever or do we want to
(Apologies for the re-send, missed the appropriate tag on the subject line!)
Hello! Our next OpenStack App Catalog meeting will take place this
Thursday July 16th at 17:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3
The agenda can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/app-catalog
Please add
1600utc on Thursday (9am PDT Thursday) works for me. Can we use
#openstack-lbaas channel ?
I have committed under development lbaas v2 horizon code to my public github
and will move it to neutron-lbaas: https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lbaas
Thanks,
Vivek
From: Doug Wiegley
Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/14/2015 01:46 AM, Perry, Sean wrote:
-Original Message- From: Doug Hellmann
[mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 3:41
PM To: openstack-dev Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Time to
On Jul 13, 2015, at 8:40 PM, Steven Dake (stdake)
std...@cisco.commailto:std...@cisco.com wrote:
From: OTSUKA, Motohiro yuany...@oeilvert.orgmailto:yuany...@oeilvert.org
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
To better accommodate the active contributors, we're moving our IRC meeting
to
2300 UTC = 4p Pacific = 7p Eastern
#openstack-meeting-3
Hope to see you there!
Tim
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Peng,
On Jul 13, 2015, at 8:37 PM, Peng Zhao p...@hyper.shmailto:p...@hyper.sh
wrote:
Thanks Adrian!
Hi, all,
Let me recap what is hyper and the idea of hyperstack.
Hyper is a single-host runtime engine. Technically,
Docker = LXC + AUFS
Hyper = Hypervisor + AUFS
where AUFS is the Docker
Hi Heaters,
currently we already expose to the user only resources for services
deployed in the cloud [1], and soon we will do the same based on whether
actual user roles allow creating specific resources [2]. Here I would like
to get your opinion on some of my thoughts regarding behavior of
On 07/14/2015 03:55 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-07-14 00:33:52 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
I believe I asked you about 10 times to keep these branches alive, so
that distributions could work together on a longer support, even without
a CI behind it.
And the project
On 07/14/2015 10:29 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
On 07/14/2015 12:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I missed this announce...
On 07/02/2015 05:32 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
Per the Icehouse EOL discussion[1] last month, now that the
final 2014.1.5 release[2] is behind us I have followed our usual
On 13 July 2015 at 13:04, Dave McCowan (dmccowan) dmcco...@cisco.com wrote:
Has anyone else seen this error with the new mock?
'self' parameter lacking default value
My function under test runs correctly, but then Mock throws this TypeError
when comparing the parameters in
Thanks Lauren. Mi taco es su taco.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Lauren Sell lau...@openstack.org wrote:
Good news. After finalizing the trademark checks and giving the community
time to weigh in, Mitaka will be the name of the M release.
Thanks again for the great discussion around this
I've added this topic to the meeting agenda [1]
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderMeetings#Next_meeting
Regards,
Ivan Kolodyazhny
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:04:05PM -0700, Mike Perez wrote:
On 16:28 Jul
Hi,
I created a patch to fail on the proxy call to Neutron for used limits, found
here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/199604/
This patch was done because of this:
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/project_scope.html?highlight=proxy#no-more-api-proxies
On 14/07/15 14:34, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote:
Hi Heaters,
currently we already expose to the user only resources for services
deployed in the cloud [1], and soon we will do the same based on whether
actual user roles allow creating specific resources [2]. Here I would
like to get your opinion
We're kind of debating the same thing for the app catalog. Do we show templates
that don't work on a given cloud since they wont work, potentially making
useful tools hard to discover, or do we view it as an opportunity for users to
complain to their admins that they need X feature in order to
On 14 July 2015 at 22:41, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, no I didn't. By the time I got around to it I saw 264 and figured that
would cover the issue.
Ok - could you check? 1.1.3 has issue 264 fixed, and I'd like to fix
this one too, if its still an issue. Bonus points for checking
Now that the tempest periodic jobs are back (thanks infra!), I was
looking into the real failures. It seems the main one is caused by the
fact that the v3 check for primary creds fails if 'admin_domain_name' in
the identity section is None, which it is when devstack configures
tempest for
On 7/14/2015 3:43 PM, Cale Rath wrote:
Hi,
I created a patch to fail on the proxy call to Neutron for used limits,
found here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/199604/
This patch was done because of this:
Tom,
It is my pleasure to welcome you to the magnum-core group. We are happy to have
you on the team.
Regards,
Adrian
On Jul 9, 2015, at 7:20 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
Team,
Tom Cammann (tcammann) has become a valued Magnum contributor, and consistent
reviewer
Good news. After finalizing the trademark checks and giving the community time
to weigh in, Mitaka will be the name of the M release.
Thanks again for the great discussion around this topic, and for the
willingness to be responsive to the concerns of fellow community members.
On Jul 9,
On 7/14/15, 13:47, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
Hi everybody!
Ok. There is nothing more actually useful I can say that isn't in the
subject line. As I mentioned previously, the preliminary results from
our name election are here:
Making users complain to admins that may have little to no control over what is
and isn't available isn't a healthy strategy for user experience. Purposefully
engineering hardship to try and influence operators to do the right thing in
someone else's opinion sounds pretty counter productive to
On 17:44 Jul 14, Silvan Kaiser wrote:
Hello Cinder Community!
I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for change [1], re-adding the
Quobyte driver to Cinder.
The driver was removed in change [2] due to missing CI activity [3], it was
originally added in the kilo release [4].
We've
Just for the sake of future googlers. I’ve encountered the same problem (with
horizon actually) and managed to solve it.
1) install and link latest openssl from homebrew: brew update brew install
openssl brew link --force openssl
2) run tox, it fails.
3) manually activate the environment you
Also for the sake of future googlers: we gave up on supporting keystone
development in OS X a release or two ago due to the increasing number of
workarounds like this that we had to track (a few of which impacted the
code base itself, and were thus dropped).
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:42 PM,
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
