Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] nova aggregate and nova placement api aggregate

2018-05-24 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 5/24/2018 8:33 PM, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: Recently, i am trying to implement a function which aggregate nova hypervisors rather than nova compute host. But seems nova only aggregate nova-compute host. On the other hand, since Ocata, nova depends on placement api which supports aggregating

Re: [openstack-dev] [StarlingX] StarlingX code followup discussions

2018-05-24 Thread Tim Bell
I'd like to understand the phrase "StarlingX is an OpenStack Foundation Edge focus area project". My understanding of the current situation is that "StarlingX would like to be OpenStack Foundation Edge focus area project". I have not been able to keep up with all of the discussions so I'd be

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] nova aggregate and nova placement apiaggregate

2018-05-24 Thread Chen CH Ji
not sure whether it will helpful , FYI https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/placement/ The primary differences between Nova’s host aggregates and placement aggregates are the following: In Nova, a host aggregate associates a nova-compute service with other nova-compute services.

[openstack-dev] [nova] nova aggregate and nova placement api aggregate

2018-05-24 Thread Jeffrey Zhang
Recently, i am trying to implement a function which aggregate nova hypervisors rather than nova compute host. But seems nova only aggregate nova-compute host. On the other hand, since Ocata, nova depends on placement api which supports aggregating resource providers. But nova-scheduler doesn't

Re: [Openstack-operators] pci passthrough & numa affinity

2018-05-24 Thread Jonathan D. Proulx
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 06:34:06PM -0500, Eric Fried wrote: :How long are you willing to wait? : :The work we're doing to use Placement from Nova ought to allow us to :model both of these things nicely from the virt driver, and request them :nicely from the flavor. : :By the end of Rocky we will

Re: [Openstack-operators] pci passthrough & numa affinity

2018-05-24 Thread Eric Fried
How long are you willing to wait? The work we're doing to use Placement from Nova ought to allow us to model both of these things nicely from the virt driver, and request them nicely from the flavor. By the end of Rocky we will have laid a large percentage of the groundwork to enable this. This

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Status of neutron-rpc-server

2018-05-24 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, I'd like to know what's the status of neutron-rpc-server. As I switched the Debian package from neutron-server to neutron-api using uwsgi, I tried using it, and it seems it kind of works, if I apply this patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/555608 Is there anything else that I should

Re: [Openstack-operators] pci passthrough & numa affinity

2018-05-24 Thread Jonathan D. Proulx
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 07:59:16AM +1000, Blair Bethwaite wrote: :Hi Jon, : :Following up to the question you asked during the HPC on OpenStack :panel at the summit yesterday... : :You might have already seen Daniel Berrange's blog on this topic:

[Openstack-operators] [nova] Need some feedback on the proposed heal_allocations CLI

2018-05-24 Thread Matt Riedemann
I've written a nova-manage placement heal_allocations CLI [1] which was a TODO from the PTG in Dublin as a step toward getting existing CachingScheduler users to roll off that (which is deprecated). During the CERN cells v1 upgrade talk it was pointed out that CERN was able to go from

[openstack-dev] [nova] Need some feedback on the proposed heal_allocations CLI

2018-05-24 Thread Matt Riedemann
I've written a nova-manage placement heal_allocations CLI [1] which was a TODO from the PTG in Dublin as a step toward getting existing CachingScheduler users to roll off that (which is deprecated). During the CERN cells v1 upgrade talk it was pointed out that CERN was able to go from

[Openstack-operators] pci passthrough & numa affinity

2018-05-24 Thread Blair Bethwaite
Hi Jon, Following up to the question you asked during the HPC on OpenStack panel at the summit yesterday... You might have already seen Daniel Berrange's blog on this topic:

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Community Documentation - first anchor point

2018-05-24 Thread Jonathan D. Proulx
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 01:26:07PM -0700, Melvin Hillsman wrote: : I think a great model we have in general as a community is if people : show up to do the work, it is not something crazy, get out of their : way; at least that is how I think of it. I apologize if there is any : perception

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Community Documentation - first anchor point

2018-05-24 Thread Melvin Hillsman
I think a great model we have in general as a community is if people show up to do the work, it is not something crazy, get out of their way; at least that is how I think of it. I apologize if there is any perception opposed to my previous statement by me bringing up the other repos. I tried to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [StarlingX] StarlingX code followup discussions

2018-05-24 Thread Dan Smith
> For example, I look at your nova fork and it has a "don't allow this > call during an upgrade" decorator on many API calls. Why wasn't that > done upstream? It doesn't seem overly controversial, so it would be > useful to understand the reasoning for that change. Interesting. We have internal

Re: [Openstack] Struggling to get the s3 api interface to work with swift.

2018-05-24 Thread Kota TSUYUZAKI
Hi, Shyam > tester => { > id => 'test:tester', > key => 'testing', > }, If you are using this id/password to get your token from keystone, you should set them as access_key and secret key for your s3 client. You don't have to set any token information from keystone for

Re: [Openstack] Cinder Queens installdoc wrong

2018-05-24 Thread Amy
Hi Torin, I double checked with Cinder and you are correct the port should be 5000. I’ll get it bugged and patched after Summit. Thanks, Amy (spotz) Sent from my iPhone > On May 24, 2018, at 5:36 AM, Torin Woltjer > wrote: > > I've upgraded from pike to

Re: [openstack-dev] FW: [cinder]

2018-05-24 Thread Ivan Kolodyazhny
Hello, Please, try `cinder --os-volume-api-versio=3 manageable-list openstack-dev@VMAX_ISCSI_DIAMOND#Diamond+DSS+SRP_1+000297000333` or `OS_VOLUME_API_VERSION=3 cinder manageable-list openstack-dev@VMAX_ISCSI_ DIAMOND#Diamond+DSS+SRP_1+000297000333` Devstack used Cinder API v2 by default before

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Community Documentation - first anchor point

2018-05-24 Thread Jonathan D. Proulx
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 07:07:10AM -0700, Doug Hellmann wrote: :I know you wanted to avoid lots of governance overhead, so I want :to just mention that establishing a SIG is meant to be a painless :and light-weight way to declare that a group of interested people :exists so that others can find

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Community Documentation - first anchor point

2018-05-24 Thread Jonathan D. Proulx
My intention based on current understandign would be to create a git repo called "osops-docs" as this fits current naming an thin initial document we intend to put there and the others we may adopt from docs-team. My understanding being they don't to have this type of documentention due to much

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci][infra] Quickstart Branching

2018-05-24 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
On 5/23/18 6:49 PM, Sagi Shnaidman wrote: Alex, the problem is that you're working and focusing mostly on release specific code like featuresets and some scripts. But tripleo-quickstart(-extras) and tripleo-ci is much *much* more than set of featuresets. Only 10% of the code may be related

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Community Documentation - first anchor point

2018-05-24 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-05-23 22:58:40 -0700: > Excerpts from Melvin Hillsman's message of 2018-05-23 22:26:02 -0700: > > Great to see this moving. I have some questions/concerns based on your > > statement Doug about docs.openstack.org publishing and do not want to > >

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] afs02 r/o volume mirrors - ongoing incident

2018-05-24 Thread Ian Wienand
On 05/24/2018 08:45 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: > On 05/24/2018 05:40 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: >> In an effort to resolve this, the afs01 & 02 servers were restarted to >> clear all old transactions, and for the affected mirrors I essentially >> removed their read-only copies and re-added them with: > >

[Openstack] Cinder Queens installdoc wrong

2018-05-24 Thread Torin Woltjer
I've upgraded from pike to queens, and the keystone admin port 35357 has been deprecated in favor of 5000 it seems. However, the documentation for the installation of cinder still uses that port in [keystone_authtoken]. What is the correct entry for this line? auth_url = http://controller:5000

[Openstack] Struggling to get the s3 api interface to work with swift.

2018-05-24 Thread Shyam Prasad N
Hi, I've been trying to get swift3 to work for several days now. But I haven't managed to get it running. Both with tempauth and keystoneauth, I'm getting the same error: eightkpc@objectstore1:~/s3curl$ ./s3curl.pl --id=testerks -- http://127.0.0.1:8080/ SignatureDoesNotMatchThe request

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Using derive parameters workflow for FixedIPs

2018-05-24 Thread Saravanan KR
As discussed in the IRC over , here is the outline: * Derive parameters workflow could be used for deriving FixedIPs parameters also (started as part of the review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/569818/) * Above derivation should be done for all the deployments, so invoking of derive parameters

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] afs02 r/o volume mirrors - ongoing incident

2018-05-24 Thread Ian Wienand
On 05/24/2018 05:40 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: > In an effort to resolve this, the afs01 & 02 servers were restarted to > clear all old transactions, and for the affected mirrors I essentially > removed their read-only copies and re-added them with: It seems this theory of removing the volumes and

Re: [Openstack-operators] attaching network cards to VMs taking a very long time

2018-05-24 Thread Saverio Proto
Glad to hear it! Always monitor rabbitmq queues to identify bottlenecks !! :) Cheers Saverio Il gio 24 mag 2018, 11:07 Radu Popescu | eMAG, Technology < radu.pope...@emag.ro> ha scritto: > Hi, > > did the change yesterday. Had no issue this morning with neutron not being > able to move fast

[openstack-dev] FW: [cinder]

2018-05-24 Thread Walsh, Helen
Sending on Michael's behalf... From: McAleer, Michael Sent: Monday 21 May 2018 15:18 To: 'openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org' Subject: FW: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Hi Cinder Devs, I would like to ask a question concerning Cinder CLI commands in DevStack 13.0.0.0b2.dev167. I stacked a clean

Re: [Openstack-operators] attaching network cards to VMs taking a very long time

2018-05-24 Thread Radu Popescu | eMAG, Technology
Hi, did the change yesterday. Had no issue this morning with neutron not being able to move fast enough. Still, we had some storage issues, but that's another thing. Anyway, I'll leave it like this for the next few days and report back in case I get the same slow neutron errors. Thanks a lot!

[OpenStack-Infra] afs02 r/o volume mirrors - ongoing incident

2018-05-24 Thread Ian Wienand
Hi, We were notified of an issue around 22:45GMT with the volumes backing the storage on afs02.dfw.o.o, which holds R/O mirrors for our AFS volumes. It seems that during this time there were a number of "vos release"s in flight, or started, that ended up with volumes in a range of unreliable

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Community Documentation - first anchor point

2018-05-24 Thread Melvin Hillsman
Sure definitely, that's why I said I was not trying to detour the conversation, but rather asking for feedback. Definitely agree things should continue to plow forward and Chris has been doing an excellent job here and I think it is awesome that he is continuing to push this. On Wed, May 23, 2018

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposing Mark Goddard to ironic-core

2018-05-24 Thread Yolanda Robla Mota
+1 .. his reviews have always been helpful to me On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 7:57 AM, Shivanand Tendulker wrote: > +1 from me. > > > > On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Julia Kreger > wrote: > >> Greetings everyone! >> >> I would like to propose

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Community Documentation - first anchor point

2018-05-24 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Melvin Hillsman's message of 2018-05-23 22:26:02 -0700: > Great to see this moving. I have some questions/concerns based on your > statement Doug about docs.openstack.org publishing and do not want to > detour the conversation but ask for feedback. Currently there are a number I'm