+1
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 9:47 AM John Fulton wrote:
> +1
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 9:46 AM Alex Schultz wrote:
> >
> > +1
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 6:29 AM Emilien Macchi
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 8:24 AM Juan Antonio Osorio Robles <
> jaosor...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:41 PM Ildiko Vancsa
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The PTG is approaching quickly and as we are planning a couple of joint
> sessions on edge computing with a couple of OpenStack project teams I would
> like to give a quick summary of the plans.
>
> We have the Edge Computing Group
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 9:20 AM Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
> On 8/13/18 9:47 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd like to get some feedback regarding the remaining
> > work for the split controlplane spec implementation [1]
> >
> > Specifically, while for some services like nova-compute
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 10:18 AM Amy Marrich wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Forwarding to the Dev list as you may get a better response from there.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Amy (spotz)
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:30 PM, Keynes Lee/WHQ/Wistron <
> keynes_...@wistron.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>>
>>
>> When making “cinder
On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 9:02 AM Jay Bryant
wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> Just a note thatyou may need to look way back in the logs to find the
> cause as there m as y be many periodic job failures filling the logs.
>
> Jay
>
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2018, 7:09 AM Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
>
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> Do
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:41 AM, Juan Antonio Osorio
wrote:
> It is unfortunately a known issue and is present in queens and master as
> well. I think Michele (bandini on IRC) was working on it.
>
See [1], and note that [2] merged to stable/queens just a couple days ago.
[1]
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:00 PM, fengyd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Ceph for cinder backend.
> Do you have any plan to support multiattach for Ceph backend?
A lot of people have expressed an interest in this, so I'm sure
multi-attach with Ceph will eventually be supported. However, it will
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 3:26 AM, Juan Antonio Osorio <jaosor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 4 Jan 2018 23:35, "Alan Bishop" <abis...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Has there been any previous discussion on providing a mechanism for
> transferring owners
Has there been any previous discussion on providing a mechanism for
transferring ownership of a secret from one user to another?
Cinder supports the notion of transferring volume ownership to another
user, who may be in another tenant/project. However, if the volume is
encrypted it's possible
er
>
> class ConfKeyManager(conf_key_manager.ConfKeyManager):
> pass
>
> Having a common ConfKeyManager implementation will make it much
> easier to support migrating things to Barbican, and that's an important
> step toward the goal of deprecating the ConfKeyManager entir
ch
easier to support migrating things to Barbican, and that's an important
step toward the goal of deprecating the ConfKeyManager entirely.
Please let me know your thoughts, as I plan to begin proposing patches.
Regards,
Alan Bishop
__
11 matches
Mail list logo
