Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI promotion blockers

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Julie Pichon wrote: > Hi! > > On 27 December 2017 at 16:48, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> - Keystone removed _member_ role management, so we stopped using it >> (only Member is enough): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/529849/ >

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Ubuntu problems + Help needed

> Just a note, the queens repo is not currently synced in the infra so > the queens repo patch is failing on Ubuntu jobs. I've proposed adding > queens to the infra configuration to resolve this: > https://review.openstack.org/529670 > As a follow up, the mirrors have landed and two of the four

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Ubuntu problems + Help needed

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote: > Currently they are all globally failing in master (we are using pike > still[0] which is probably the problem) in the tempest run[1] due to: > AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'require

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Ubuntu problems + Help needed

Currently they are all globally failing in master (we are using pike still[0] which is probably the problem) in the tempest run[1] due to: AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'requires_ext' I've submit a patch[2] to switch UCA to queens. If history is any indication, it will probably

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tis the season...for a cloud reboot

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: > The reboot is done (mostly...see below). > > On 12/18/2017 05:11 PM, Joe Talerico wrote: >> >> Ben - Can you provide some links to the ovs port exhaustion issue for >> some background? > > > I don't know if we ever had a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Planning for job execution outside the gate with Zuul v3

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 3:31 PM, David Moreau Simard wrote: > Hi, > > As the migration of review.rdoproject.org to Zuul v3 draws closer, I'd like > to open up the discussion around how we want to approach an eventual > migration to Zuul v3 outside the gate. > I'd like to take

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Canceling weekly meetings for Dec 26th and Jan 2nd

Hey everyone, Due to likely low attendance, we'll be canceling the next two weekly meetings on Dec 26th and Jan 2nd. We'll resume weekly meetings back on Jan 9th. Happy holidays and stuff. Thanks, -Alex __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Blueprints moved out to Rocky

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Tony Breeds <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:01:41PM -0700, Alex Schultz wrote: >> I assume since some of this work was sort of done earlier outside of >> tripleo and does not affect the default installation pa

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Blueprints moved out to Rocky

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Mark Hamzy <ha...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote on 12/14/2017 09:24:54 AM: >> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Mark Hamzy <ha...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> ... As I said previously, please post the &

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Blueprints moved out to Rocky

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Mark Hamzy <ha...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote on 12/13/2017 04:29:49 PM: >> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Mark Hamzy <ha...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> > What I have done at a high level is to rena

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Blueprints moved out to Rocky

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Mark Hamzy wrote: >> I just need an understanding on the impact and the timeline. Replying >> here is sufficient. >> >> I assume since some of this work was sort of done earlier outside of >> tripleo and does not affect the default installation

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Blueprints moved out to Rocky

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Sven Anderson <s...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 12:35 AM Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Please take some time to review the list of blueprints currently >> associated with Rocky[0] to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Blueprints moved out to Rocky

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Tony Breeds <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 04:34:09PM -0700, Alex Schultz wrote: >> Hey folks, >> >> So I went through the list of blueprints and moved some that were >> either not updated or ap

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Blueprints moved out to Rocky

end user to be able to consume these environment files via the UI as well. Thanks, -Alex > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alex Schultz [mailto:aschu...@redhat.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 12:20 AM >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Blueprints moved out to Rocky

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Brad P. Crochet <b...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 6:35 PM Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Hey folks, >> >> So I went through the list of blueprints and moved some that were >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Blueprints moved out to Rocky

/2017/tripleo.2017-11-14-14.01.log.html#l-170 > > [1] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/502313/ > [2] - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-ovs-hw-offload > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alex Schultz [mailto:aschu...@redhat.com] >> Sent: Sa

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Blueprints moved out to Rocky

Hey folks, So I went through the list of blueprints and moved some that were either not updated or appeared to have a bunch of patches not in a mergable state. Please take some time to review the list of blueprints currently associated with Rocky[0] to see if your efforts have been moved. If you

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nominate Gaël Chamoulaud (gchamoul) for tripleo-validations core

+1 On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Ana Krivokapic wrote: > Hey TripleO devs, > > Gaël has consistently been contributing high quality reviews and patches to > the tripleo-validations project. The project would highly benefit from his > addition to the core reviewer team. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Wesley Hayutin core on TripleO CI

+1 On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Team, > > Wes has been consistently and heavily involved in TripleO CI work. > He has a very well understanding on how tripleo-quickstart and > tripleo-quickstart-extras work, his number and quality of reviews are >

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Queens milestone 2 released

Hello everyone, We have released TripleO for Queens milestone 2 yesterday. As we discussed at the PTG, now is the time to stop working on new features and start stabilizing the release. As mentioned in the meeting today[0], we need to start reviewing the open patches for features still in flight

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rename ovb jobs?

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Bogdan and Dmitry's suggestions are imho a bit too much and would lead > to very very (very) long names... Do we actually want that? > No i don't think so. I think -- is ideal for communicating at least the basics. If we

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] containerized undercloud update

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> Just wanted to share some progress with the containerized undercloud work. >> Ian push

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] containerized undercloud update

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 3:54 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 11/30/17 10:36 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> >> Just wanted to share some progress with the containerized undercloud work. >> Ian pushed some of the patches along and we now have a successful >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] containerized undercloud update

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > Greetings, > > Just wanted to share some progress with the containerized undercloud work. > Ian pushed some of the patches along and we now have a successful undercloud > install with containers. > > The initial

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ronelle Landy for Tripleo-Quickstart/Extras/CI core

+1 On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:34 PM, John Trowbridge wrote: > I would like to propose Ronelle be given +2 for the above repos. She has > been a solid contributor to tripleo-quickstart and extras almost since the > beginning. She has solid review numbers, but more importantly

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] configuring qemu.conf using puppet or ansible

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Saravanan KR wrote: > Hello, > > For dpdk in ovs2.8, the default permission of vhost user ports are > modified from root:root to openvswitch:hugeltbfs. The vhost user > ports are shared between ovs and libvirt (qemu). More details on BZ >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] IPSEC integration

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: > Hello folks! > > A few months ago Dan Sneddon and me worked in an ansible role that would > enable IPSEC for the overcloud [1]. Currently, one would run it as an extra > step after the overcloud deployment. But, I

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Status of CI

Hey folks, So over the weekend we have successfully moved our jobs in-tree with zuul v3 thanks to Emilien's hard work. There are a few outstanding issues with some stable branches that he is working on. Additionally we have switched scenario001 and scenaio003 to non-voting due to Bug

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] need help with tempest failures for Bug 1731063

Hello everyone, Bug 1731063[0] has been kicking around for almost 10 days now. We're now seeing something similar to it on scenario003 and will be switching it to non-voting[1] as soon as the v3 cut over finishes. This is removing additional test coverage and unless we start seeing some movement

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Migrating TripleO CI in-tree tomorrow - please README

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > TL;DR: don't approve or recheck any tripleo patch from now, until > further notice on this thread. > > Some good progress has been made on migrating legacy tripleo CI jobs > to be in-tree: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nominate akrivoka for tripleo-validations core

+1 On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Honza Pokorny wrote: > Hello people, > > I would like to nominate Ana Krivokapić (akrivoka) for the core team for > tripleo-validations. She has really stepped up her game on that project > in terms of helpful reviews, and great patches. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Please do not approve or recheck anything not related to CI alert bugs

/1731063 On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote: > Ok so here's the current status of things. I've gone through some of > the pending patches and sent them to the gate over the weekend since > the gate was empty (yay!). We've managed to land a b

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [ironic] automatic migration from classic drivers to hardware types?

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi folks! > > This was raised several times, now I want to bring it to the wider audience. > We're planning [1] to deprecate classic drivers in Queens and remove them in > Rocky. It was pointed at the Forum that we'd

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] automatic migration from classic drivers to hardware types?

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi folks! > > This was raised several times, now I want to bring it to the wider audience. > We're planning [1] to deprecate classic drivers in Queens and remove them in > Rocky. It was pointed at the Forum that we'd

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/puppet-swift failed

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from zuul's message of 2017-11-13 09:24:15 +: >> Build failed. >> >> - release-openstack-puppet >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Please do not approve or recheck anything not related to CI alert bugs

://review.openstack.org/#/c/519041/ [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1731063 [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1731032 [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1731540 [5] http://zuulv3.openstack.org/ On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote

Re: [Openstack-operators] [puppet] keystone.conf and 'federation/trusted_dashboard' (multi valued)

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Red Cricket wrote: > Hi, > > I am using https://github.com/openstack/puppet-keystone (stable/newton > branch) and we would like to implement a design that uses federation openid. > > As part of this design I need to add these lines to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nominate chem and matbu for tripleo-core !

+1 On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:48 AM, Marios Andreou wrote: > Hello fellow owls, > (appologies for duplicate, forgot to add the tripleo in subject so worried > it would be missed) > > I would like to nominate (and imo these are both long overdue already): > > Sofer Athlan Guyot

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Please do not approve or recheck anything not related to CI alert bugs

it[4]. Thanks, -Alex [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1731032 [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1731063 On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hey Folks > > So we're at 24+ hours again in the gate[0] and the queue only >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing John Fulton core on TripleO

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose John Fulton core on TripleO. > > I think John did an awesome work during the Pike cycle around the > integration of ceph-ansible as a replacement for puppet-ceph, for the > deployment of

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:30 AM, James Slagle wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Dan Prince

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Please do not approve or recheck anything not related to CI alert bugs

Hey Folks So we're at 24+ hours again in the gate[0] and the queue only continues to grow. We currently have 6 ci/alert bugs[1]. Please do not approve of recheck anything that isn't related to these bugs. I will most likely need to go through the queue and abandon everything to clear it up as we

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-containers job needs attention

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > Greetings, > > We noticed the job legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-containers failing > in the gate in the following patches [1], [2]. The job was voting in the > review here [3]. ATM the job is non-voting in

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][tripleo][puppet] Logging format: let's discuss a bit about default format, format configuration and so on

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 12:21 AM, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: > On 11/02/2017 05:18 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: >> Adding tags for the relevant projects. I _think_ this is mostly >> directed at Puppet/TripleO, but Oslo is obviously relevant as well. > > Thank you! First mail

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI Status & Where to find your patch's status in CI

Hey Folks, So the gate queue is quite backed up due to various reasons. If your patch has been approved but you're uncertain of the CI status please, please, please check the dashboard[0] before doing anything. Do not rebase or recheck things currently in a queue somewhere. When you rebase a

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

this in the future. Thanks, -Alex > > [0] > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2017/keystone.2017-10-10-18.00.log.html#l-107 > > On 10/19/2017 12:00 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Lance Bragstad <lbrags...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > Hey all, > > Now that we're finishing up the last few bits of v2.0 removal, I'd like to > send out a reminder that Queens will not include the v2.0 keystone APIs > except the ec2-api. Authentication and validation of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [stable] [tripleo] [kolla] [ansible] [puppet] Proposing changes in stable policy for installers

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Emilien, > > I generally thought the stable policy seemed reasonable enough for lifecycle > management tools. I’m not sure what specific problems you had in TripleO > although I did read your review. Kolla was

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Proposing Alfredo Moralejo core on puppet-openstack-integration

+1 thanks for the great contributions On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Mohammed Naser wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> >> Alfredo has been doing an incredible work on maintaining Puppet >> OpenStack CI; by always

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Reminder about specs for Queens

Hey folks, As we approach milestone 1 for Queens, we need to be mindful of the open specs[0]. Please take some time to review the posted specs. Also if you need to propose a new spec, please do so as soon as possible. The goal for this cycle is to close the spec repo at milestone 2. The hope is

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Repo structure for ansible-k8s-roles-* under TripleO's umbrella

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 09/10/17 12:41 -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: >> [...] >>> >>> 1. A repo per role: Each role would have its own repo - this is the way >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Preping for the stable/newton EOL

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Tony Breeds <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:00:00AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Tony Breeds <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> wrote: > >> Would it be possible to delay the Newto

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Repo structure for ansible-k8s-roles-* under TripleO's umbrella

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 3:29 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > Greetings, > > I've been working on something called triple-apbs (and it's respective > roles) in > the last couple of months. You can find more info about this work > here[0][1][2] > > This work is at the point where I

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Unbranched repositories and testing

Hey folks, So I wandered across the policy spec[0] for how we should be handling unbranched repository reviews and I would like to start a broader discussion around this topic. We've seen it several times over the recent history where a change in oooqe or tripleo-ci ends up affecting either a

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Preping for the stable/newton EOL

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi All, > This is a quick update on the process for tagging stable/newton as > EOL: > > The published[1][2] timeline is: > Sep 29 : Final newton library releases > Oct 09 : stable/newton branches enter Phase III >

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] bugs moved to queens-2

Hey everyone, So during our IRC meeting[0], it was mentioned that we should move <= Medium bugs over to queens-2 to help with visibility of more important bugs. Since we had 470+ total bugs targeted to queens-1, I have moved all the medium bugs that were not yet In Progress to queens-2 and will

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Dan Prince <dpri...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 16:03 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Dan Prince <dpri...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Dan Prince <dpri...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Dan Prince <dpri...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, 2017-10-

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Dan Prince <dpri...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 15:20 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: >>> Hey Dan, >>> >>> Thanks for sendi

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Dan Prince <dpri...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 15:20 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: >> Hey Dan, >> >> Thanks for sending out a note about this. I have a few questions >> inline. >> >> On Mon, Oct 2, 20

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

Hey Dan, Thanks for sending out a note about this. I have a few questions inline. On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 6:02 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > One of the things the TripleO containers team is planning on tackling > in Queens is fully containerizing the undercloud. At the PTG we

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Newton End-Of-Life (EOL) next month (reminder #1)

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:31:59PM -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Tony Breeds >> wrote: >> > With that in mind I'd suggest that your review isn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Simplification in OpenStack

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > In Kolla, during this PTG, we came up with idea of scenario based > testing+documentation. Basically what we want to do is to provide set > of kolla configurations, howtos and tempest configs to test out > different

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Pike Retrospective & Status reporting

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hey folks, > > We started off our PTG with a retrospective for Pike. The output of > which can be viewed here[0][1]. > > One of the recurring themes from the retrospective and the PTG w

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][puppet-ceph] missing dependencies for openstacklib::openstackclient in metadata.json

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Emil Enemærke wrote: > There is also missing dependency for openstack/keystone, which is also used > in ceph::rgw::keystone::auth line 63, 68, 75, 85 > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Emil Enemærke wrote: >> >> Hi >> >>

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Blueprints for Queens

Hey folks, At the end of the PTG we did some work to triage the blueprints for TripleO. The goal was to ensure that some of the items we talked about were properly captured for the Queens cycle. Please take a look at the blueprints targeted towards queens[0] and update them with a reasonable

[Openstack-operators] [tripleo] Making containerized service deployment the default

Hey ops & devs, We talked about containers extensively at the PTG and one of the items that needs to be addressed is that currently we still deploy the services as bare metal services via puppet. For Queens we would like to switch the default to be containerized services. With this switch we

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Making containerized service deployment the default

Hey ops & devs, We talked about containers extensively at the PTG and one of the items that needs to be addressed is that currently we still deploy the services as bare metal services via puppet. For Queens we would like to switch the default to be containerized services. With this switch we

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Pike Retrospective & Status reporting

Hey folks, We started off our PTG with a retrospective for Pike. The output of which can be viewed here[0][1]. One of the recurring themes from the retrospective and the PTG was the need for better communication during the cycle. One of the ideas that was mentioned was adding a section to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] question about healthcheck

On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Can someone explain me (sorry for the dumb question) why do we force > healthcheck to be positive when deploying TripleO containers? > > healthcheck: > test: /bin/true > >

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Add Mohammed Naser to cores

Hey folks, I'm writing to ask that we add mnaser to the cores list for the puppet modules. He's been a user and contributor for some time and is also the new PTL. Let me know if there are any objections. Thanks, -Alex __

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Can we remove the monkey_patch_modules config option?

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I'm having a hard time tracing what this is necessary for. It's related to > the notify_decorator which is around for legacy notifications but I don't > actually see that decorator used anywhere. Given there are other

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet neutron]

On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 12:37 AM, hanish gogada wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently neutron ml2 ovs agent puppet module does not support the > configuration of ovsdb_connection. Does any work on this is in progress. > We had

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposal to require bugs for tech debt

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Markus Zoeller <mzoel...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On 16.08.2017 02:59, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> Hey folks, >>> >>> I'm proposing th

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposal to require bugs for tech debt

Hey folks, I'm proposing that in order to track tech debt that we're adding in as part of development that we create a way to track these items and not approve them without a bug (and a reference to said bug)[0]. Please take a moment to review the proposed policy and comment. I would like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][puppet] Hold off on approving patches until further notice

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 07:03:32AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: >> FYI, >> >> The gates are hosed for a variety of reasons[0][1] and we can't get >> critical patches merged. Please ho

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][puppet] Hold off on approving patches until further notice

FYI, The gates are hosed for a variety of reasons[0][1] and we can't get critical patches merged. Please hold off on rechecking or approving anything new until further notice. We're hoping to get some of the fixes for this merged today. I will send a note when it's OK to merge again. [0]

[openstack-dev] [elections][tripleo] Queens PTL candidacy

efforts to hopefully improve our development velocities. Thanks, Alex Schultz irc: mwhahaha __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] new "linter" rules for openstack/releases repository

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Alex Schultz's message of 2017-08-01 12:55:15 -0600: >> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> > The release team is working on a series of patches to improve the

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] new "linter" rules for openstack/releases repository

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > The release team is working on a series of patches to improve the > data validation within openstack/releases. Part of that work is to > apply consistent formatting rules for all of the YAML files, so it > is easier to

[openstack-dev] [puppet] End of scheduled IRC meetings

Hey everyone, So over the last cycle as participation has dropped off, we've been having less of the scheduled meetings. In today's meeting[0] it was expressed that the formal meeting is nice but realistically it's more work than it's worth these days. So we will be dropping the formal schedule

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Meeting tomorrow Aug 1, 2017 @ 1500 UTC

Just as a reminder, we do have a meeting tomorrow. If you would like to talk about anything, please make sure it's on the agenda[0]. Thanks, -Alex [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20170801

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Saravanan KR core

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Jason E. Rist wrote: > On 07/21/2017 09:08 AM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote: >> +1 from my side! >> Saravanan is part of our team, and he is brilliant. He is one of our team >> gurus when talking about TripleO and NFV integration. From our NFVPE

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Bogdan Dobrelya core on TripleO / Containers

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Brent Eagles wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Bogdan (bogdando on IRC) has been very

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Intermittent Jenkins failures

(updated topic to include [tripleo]) On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Abhishek Kane wrote: > Hi, > > > > Recently saw intermittent jenkins failures in difference scenarios for patch > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/475765/17. > > > > Current ones are- > > In

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][l2-gateway] Added Ricardo Noriega to the core team

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Ricardo Noriega De Soto < rnori...@redhat.com> wrote: > Thanks Gary for the opportunity! We'll keep fighting! :-) > > Congrats. Your efforts in the puppet openstack repos to also get this properly supported and tested have also been very appreciated. Thanks,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Forming our plans around Ansible

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 11:50 AM, James Slagle wrote: > I proposed a session for the PTG > (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ptg-queens) about forming a > common plan and vision around Ansible in TripleO. > > I think it's important however that we kick this

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Meeting on July 11, 2017

Hey folks, Just a heads up we have a meeting scheduled for tomorrow July 11, 2017 @ 1500 UTC. The agenda is available here[0]. I would like to take a few mins to review any outstanding work for Pike. Feel free to add any additional topics. Thanks, -Alex [0]

[openstack-dev] [puppet][fuel] Proposal to drop Fuel CI jobs from Puppet CI

Hey folks, Since Fuel has been recently moved to a hosted project and there is very little activity anymore, I am proposing (with much sadness) that we remove the Fuel CI jobs from Puppet CI. This is being brought up because we have a change in puppet-swift that is going to break the fuel jobs

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] quickstart failing due to unresolved dependencies

ink you're missing, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/475352/ because your puppet-tripleo has https://review.openstack.org/#/c/475387/ which removed that profile. Update your instack-undercloud. Thanks, -Alex > > > Regards, > Udi Kalifon; Senior QE; RHOS-UI Automation > > > On Mo

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][magnum][kolla][ansible][puppet][rally] removing SSH drivers from Ironic

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 5:01 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: > Hi all, > > as mitaka branch was finally EOLed, Ironic team is going to proceed with > removal of SSH-based power and management drivers for virtualized HW which > were deprecated back in newton release. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] quickstart failing due to unresolved dependencies

On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Udi Kalifon wrote: > Hi. > > I tried to install the latest TripleO with quickstart, and it failed in the > undercloud install. I logged in to the undercloud and checked the install > log, and I see errors there like "ModuleLoader: module

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][mistral][deployment] how to add deployment roles

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Dan Trainor wrote: > Hi - > > I'm looking for the glue that populates the overcloud role list. > > I can get a list of roles via 'openstack overcloud role list', however I'm > looking to create new roles to incorporate in to this list. > > I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Role updates

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Dan Prince <dpri...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 09:24 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: >>> Hey folks, >>> >>> I wanted to bring

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][tripleo] Add ganesha puppet module

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Jan Provaznik wrote: > Hi, > we would like to use nfs-ganesha for accessing shares on ceph storage > cluster[1]. There is not yet a puppet module which would install and > configure nfs-ganesha service. So to be able to set up nfs-ganesha with

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Role updates

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Dan Prince <dpri...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 09:24 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: >> Hey folks, >> >> I wanted to bring to your attention that we've merged the change[0] >> to >> add a basic set of roles

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Role updates

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 2:55 AM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/09/2017 05:24 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: >> >> Hey folks, >> >> I wanted to bring to your attention that we've merged the change[0] to >> add a basic set of roles

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][mistral][tripleo][horizon][nova][releases] release models for projects tracked in global-requirements.txt

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Matthew Thode > wrote: >> We have a problem in requirements that projects that don't have the >> cycle-with-intermediary release model (most of the

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Role updates

Hey folks, I wanted to bring to your attention that we've merged the change[0] to add a basic set of roles that can be combined to create your own roles_data.yaml as needed. With this change the roles_data.yaml and roles_data_undercloud.yaml files in THT should not be changed by hand. Instead if

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ci] Adding idempotency job on overcloud deployment.

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: > Hi, > > Emilien Macchi writes: > >> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I don't think we have such a job in place. Basically that

<    1   2   3   4   >