Hello Steve,
On 09.01.2017 23:27, Steve Martinelli wrote:
> Thanks for the hint Clay, we merged
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/417892/ - expect this issue to be
> fixed in OpenStackClient 3.7.0.
unfortunately the fix didn't help - the issue is still there. I left a
comment in the bugreport,
rcloud operational by
> definition, so I think this is probably OK?
>
> Steve
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Christian Schwede [mailto:cschw...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 6:14 AM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstac
Hello everyone,
there was an earlier discussion on $subject last year [1] regarding a
bug when upscaling or replacing nodes in TripleO [2].
Shortly summarized: Swift rings are built on each node separately, and
if adding or replacing nodes (or disks) this will break the rings
because they are no
> we're trying to address in TripleO a couple of use cases for which we'd
> like to trigger a Mistral workflow from a Heat template.
>
> One example where this would be useful is the creation of the Swift
> rings, which need some data related to the Heat stack (like the list of
> Swift nodes and
Hello,
kindly asking for a FFE for a required setting to improve Swift-based
TripleO deployments:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358643/
This is required to land the last patch in a series of TripleO-doc patches:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/293311/
On 04.08.16 15:39, Giulio Fidente wrote:
> On 08/04/2016 01:26 PM, Christian Schwede wrote:
>> On 04.08.16 10:27, Giulio Fidente wrote:
>>> On 08/02/2016 09:36 PM, Christian Schwede wrote:
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> thanks Christian,
>>
On 04.08.16 10:27, Giulio Fidente wrote:
> On 08/02/2016 09:36 PM, Christian Schwede wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>
> thanks Christian,
>
>> I'd like to improve the Swift deployments done by TripleO. There are a
>> few problems today when deployed with the current
Thanks Steven for your feedback! Please see my answers inline.
On 02.08.16 23:46, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 09:36:45PM +0200, Christian Schwede wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I'd like to improve the Swift deployments done by TripleO. There are a
>&
s!
Thanks,
Christian
--
Christian Schwede
_
Red Hat GmbH
Technopark II, Haus C, Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 11-15, 85630 Grasbrunn,
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 153243
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Mark Hegarty, Charlie Peters, Michael
z and maybe
*.builder as well), and then use something like this:
ansible -a "src=rings/ dest=/etc/swift" -m copy -i inventory all
That takes care of distributing your files to all nodes (you might need
a few more options for authentication, but that's basically it).
-- Christian
--
Christ
On 28.05.15 18:56, George Shuklin wrote:
Today we've discover a very serious bug in juno:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1459726
In short: if you're using syslog, and restart rsyslog, all APIs
processes will eventually stuck with 100% CPU usage without doing
anything.
Is anyone
Hello,
On 08.05.15 12:15, Tarak Mukherjee wrote:
We have an use-case where we upload large object (2GB - 4GB) via form
post. What we are observing is , it's taking 2 - 3hrs to get the
upload completed .
Our Setup is consist of Haproxy = Swift-Proxy = Storage Node .
any chance to test an
Hello Ross,
On 05.05.15 21:54, Ross Lillie wrote:
My understanding is that Swift should automagically split files greater
that 5G into multiple segments grouped under a metafile but this appears
to not be working. This was working under the Havana release (Ubuntu)
using the Swift File System
On 01.05.15 20:33, Samuel Merritt wrote:
On 5/1/15 7:55 AM, Uwe Sauter wrote:
Am 01.05.2015 um 02:21 schrieb Samuel Merritt:
It seems like 1430268763.41931.data would be in the same allocation
group as
objects/757/a94/bd77129a1cae9e32381776e322efca94, and
bd77129a1cae9e32381776e322efca94
Hello Jonathan,
On 18.02.15 18:13, Halterman, Jonathan wrote:
1. Swift should allow authorized services to place a given number
of object replicas onto a particular rack, and onto separate
racks.
This is already possible if you use zones and regions in your ring
files. For example, if you
Hello Jonathan,
On 17.02.15 22:17, Halterman, Jonathan wrote:
Various services desire the ability to control the location of data
placed in Swift in order to minimize network saturation when moving data
to compute, or in the case of services like Hadoop, to ensure that
compute can be moved to
Hello Adam,
Swift is able to send metrics to a statsd server, and thus you can
create your own metric dashboard using graphite-web. I would add
collectd for some basic server metrics (like cpu, memory, load, network
traffic) as well. It requires a little bit of work, but it gives you a
very
Hello all,
we built an internal development platform called Software Factory and
opened it up under an Apache License on Github. While we essentially use
the same tools as the openstack-infra team, like Gerrit, Zuul, Jenkins;
our deployment is quite different with eDeploy and Heat for
On 23.12.14 03:08, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
I've been taking a look at this
(https://github.com/stackforge/swift-ceph-backend and forks etc). Looks
good.
1/ Async updates
There's a comment in rados_server.py about not handling these. What
exactly is the issue? (I note in Juno we need to add a
On 22.12.14 21:00, Amit Anand wrote:
Thanks Christian I think thats exactly what I needed - I will try and
make 2 new rings and see how that works. You wouldnt per chance know
how I would limit the replicas, ie 2 in the Paris region and 1 at HQ?
I only want one replica to goto the HQ region...
However, make sure the weights in your regions/zones are equally
distributed to ensure replicas are equally distributed as well.
Please not that you should avoid to run a Swift cluster close to 100%
capacity.
Christian
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Christian Schwede
christian.schw
On 22.12.14 19:11, Amit Anand wrote:
Now I want to try and do the following below:
http://techs.enovance.com/7094/openstack-swift-2-0-introducing-storage-policies
So pretty much have a Paris and Montreal center as described - I want to
add a third datacenter to each as replication. So it
On 14.11.14 20:43, Tim Bell wrote:
It would need to be tiered (i.e. migrate whole collections rather than
files) and a local catalog would be needed to map containers to tapes.
Timeouts would be an issue since we are often waiting hours for recall
(to ensure that multiple recalls for the same
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:44 AM, dboyzhong dboyzh...@163.com
mailto:dboyzh...@163.com wrote:
Hi. when i put a object(1K) to swift cluster, the performance is so
bad, QPS only 16. and i found the function: _finalize_put in file
Diskfile.py cost too much time . mainly caused by the fsync()
Hi Remo,
most likely the exception message itself is wrong (the shown double
port), but it got fixed a while ago:
https://github.com/openstack/python-swiftclient/commit/2e1a5b7e28211b0b2e2f7a2f961d7fcbd7e8abe3
Can you access the proxy server logs to see what's going on there?
Christian
Am
Hi,
Am 03.04.14 13:30, schrieb Ankit Deshwal:
Hello everyone
sir i am able to upload or download through swift CLI.
After changing that file i am able to access newly created account
through browser.
But why i have to put . admin after every user..???
The .admin is simply a group
Hi,
are you abled to up-/download with the new user using the CLI?
The pasted commands are not sufficient to create a user in Swift if
you're using tempauth, keystoneauth or swauth.
Assuming you're using tempauth you have to add the accounts/users to
/etc/swift/proxy-server.conf.
Hi,
yes, you can use swiftbrowser to access Swift using tempauth. I use a
local Swift all in one installation for testing as well.
Christian
Am 31.03.14 13:24, schrieb Ashish Dobhal:
Hey everyone
I have the following queries regarding openstack swift.Please help.
1.Can I use the swift
:
Thanks Sir,
i also want to know when to make the update.Before the swift
installation or before running sudo pip install -r
swift/test-requirements.txt*_ command.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Christian Schwede
christian.schw...@enovance.com
Hello Pragya,
please collect the static files in step 5 from the Readme:
python manage.py collectstatic
If you didn't changed ALLOWED_HOSTS and run swiftbrowser with Debug =
False (default) you also need to run the development server with the
--insecure option (step 6 in the Readme).
python
Hello Pragya,
5. root@pragya-VirtualBox:~/Django-1.6.2# python runtests.py
and get the following error:
ERROR 1:
python: can't open file 'runtests.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory
you're still in the Django-1.6.2 directory, you need to change to the
directoy django-swiftbrowser to
Hello,
Am 19.02.14 06:48, schrieb pragya jain:
6. root@pragya-VirtualBox:~/django-swiftbrowser/setuptools-2.2# sudo
python ./setup.py install
7. root@pragya-VirtualBox:~/django-swiftbrowser# python runtests.py
and I got the following error :
Traceback (most recent call last): File
Hi Matthieu,
Am 22.01.14 20:02, schrieb Matthieu Huin:
The idea is to have a middleware checking a domain's current usage
against a limit set in the configuration before allowing an upload.
The domain id can be extracted from the token, then used to query
keystone for a list of projects
Am 17.12.13 06:14, schrieb Frans Thamura:
or is there alternative to use swift as file sharing in office and on internet
There is also an alternative webclient, you can find it here:
https://github.com/cschwede/django-swiftbrowser
Christian
___
Am 02.12.13 17:10, schrieb Gregory Holt:
On Dec 2, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Christian Schwede
christian.schw...@enovance.com wrote:
That sounds great! Is someone already working on this (I know about
the ongoing DiskFile refactoring) or even a blueprint available?
There is https
Hello together,
I'd like to discuss a way to increase the partition power of an existing
Swift cluster.
This is most likely interesting for smaller clusters that are growing
beyond their original planed size.
As discussed earlier [1] a rehashing is required after changing the
partition power to
Am 02.12.13 15:47, schrieb Gregory Holt:
Achieving this transparently is part of the ongoing plans, starting
with things like the DiskFile refactoring and SSync. The idea is to
isolate the direct disk access from other servers/tools, something
that (for instance) RSync has today. Once the
Thanks John for the summary - and all contributors for their work!
Others are looking in to how to grow clusters (changing the partition
power)
I'm interested who else is also working on this - I successfully
increased partition power of several (smaller) clusters and would like
to discuss
A solution to this might be to set the default policy as a configuration
setting in the proxy. If you want a replicated swift cluster just allow
this policy in the proxy and set it to default. The same for EC cluster,
just set the allowed policy to EC. If you want both (and let your users
decide
39 matches
Mail list logo
