Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][FFE] FF exception for Role Decomposition patch

Thanks, Vladimir! -Dmitry. On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Thanks for you efforts, FFE is granted, please go ahead. I hope we'll get > it merged by 09/09/2016. > > Vladimir Kozhukalov > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 a

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][FFE] FF exception for Role Decomposition patch

Hi Fuelers, I would like to ask for a FFE for "Role Decomposition" feature. The spec is merged and can be fould at [0]. We were unable to land the patch [1] to Newton in time. So I would like to ask for extension till 09.09.2016 to land this patch. Changes made in the patch would introduce

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Artur Svechnikov to the fuel-web-core team

ricting them to >> review code for not more than 2.5 hours. >> >> Thanks, >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Dmitry Klenov <dkle...@mirantis.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> From technical standpoint

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Artur Svechnikov to the fuel-web-core team

Hi Folks, >From technical standpoint I fully support Arthur to become core reviewer. I like thorough reviews that he is making. Although I have some concerns as well. Planned tasks for our team will not allow Arthur to spend more than 25-30% of his time for reviewing. If that is fine - my

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][FFE] FF exception request for HugePages

nko > > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:23:06PM +0300, Dmitry Klenov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to to request a feature freeze exception for "Support for Huge > > pages for improved performance" feature [0]. > > > > Part of this feature

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][FFE] FF exception request for Numa and CPU pinning

gt; Dmitry Borodaenko > > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:23:08PM +0300, Dmitry Klenov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to to request a feature freeze exception for "Add support for > > NUMA/CPU pinning features" feature [0]. > > > > Part of t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Maksim Malchuk for the fuel-virtualbox-core team

Maksim, good job! +1 from my side though I am not a core. On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Aleksey Zvyagintsev < azvyagint...@mirantis.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Aleksandr Didenko > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Kyrylo

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][FFE] FF exception request for Numa and CPU pinning

Hi, I'd like to to request a feature freeze exception for "Add support for NUMA/CPU pinning features" feature [0]. Part of this feature is already merged [1]. We have the following patches in work / on review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/281802/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/285282/

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][FFE] FF exception request for HugePages

Hi, I'd like to to request a feature freeze exception for "Support for Huge pages for improved performance" feature [0]. Part of this feature is already merged [1]. We have the following patches in work / on review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/286628/

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Fedor Zhadaev for the fuel-menu-core team

Well done, Fedor! Congrats! -Dmitry. On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Maksim Malchuk wrote: > Congrats! > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Fedor Zhadaev > wrote: > >> Thank you! >> -- >> Kind Regards, >> Fedor Zhadaev >> >> skype: zhadaevfm >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] CentOS bootstrap image retirement

Hi Sergey, I fully support this idea. It was our plan as well when we were developing Ubuntu Bootstrap feature. So let's proceed with CentOS bootstrap removal. BR, Dmitry. On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Sergey Kulanov wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I think it's time to declare

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] OpenStack versioning in Fuel

Hi folks, I would propose to keep current versioning schema until fuel release schedule is fully aligned with OpenStack releases. AFAIK it is expected to happen since 9.0. After it we can switch to OpenStack version names. BR, Dmitry. On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Igor Kalnitsky

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Moved blueprints out of 8.0

Hi Mike, Yes, I agree that we cannot move blueprints to "Implemented" unless all dependencies are complete (incl tests and doc). Probably we can use "Beta available" for such tickets instead of "Deployment" as we can already try the functionality. All development-related child blueprints for [1]

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] [Ubuntu bootstrap] Ubuntu bootstrap becomes default in the Fuel

Hello folks, I would like to announce that we have completed all items for 'Ubuntu bootstrap' feature. Thanks to the team for hard work and dedication! Starting from today Ubuntu bootstrap is enabled in the Fuel by default. Also it is worth mentioning that Ubuntu bootstrap is integrated with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] FFE for Ubuntu bootstrap

#golserge > IRC #holser > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Dmitry Klenov <dkle...@mirantis.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Mike and Igor, >> >> Thank you for the opinions. >> >> We already talked to Matt and he is fine with Fuel Menu commit. We will >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] FFE for Ubuntu bootstrap

, Igor Kalnitsky <ikalnit...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hey Dmitry, > > I'm ok with FFE till Tuesday. Moreover, it makes sense to do so in > order to reduce affection on CentOS 7 patches. > > - Igor > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Dmitry Klenov <dkle...@mi

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] FFE for Ubuntu bootstrap

Hi folks, Let me clarify the situation with Ubuntu bootstrap feature. First of all, I would like to highlight that all functional commits for this feature were merged. This means that starting from yesterday everyone has an ability to switch to Ubuntu-based bootstrap manually and start using it.