I'm not sure if these options should be set, because they are required only
if PXE server is on different host from DHCP server, which is not the case
for Fuel.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Ken Houle <kho...@developingsolutions.com>
wrote:
> Evgeniy L:
>
>
>
> Thank yo
r: uppercase=bad)
> ||/ Name Version
> Architecture Description
> +++-==--
> -===
> ===
> ii fuel-ha-utils
Hi,
fuel_pkgs/9 means that "fuel_pkgs" task failed on node with id 9, find the
node with this id using "fuel node" (run it from Fuel node), ssh to the
nodes and look for errors in /var/log/puppet.log.
If Nova service was running before, it should be running even after
fuel_pkgs task failed on
Hi Ken,
Fuel uses Cobbler which uses DNSMasq to provide DHCP and PXE boot, if the
issue is hardware specific, you can try to search if anybody else had such
problems with DNSMasq PXE boot and similar hardware.
Thanks,
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Ken Houle
/util/execution.rb:186:in `execute'
>>>>> 2017-10-24 17:13:43ERR(/Stage[main]/Apt::Update/Exec[apt_update])
>>>>> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/puppet/util/execution.rb:186:in `waitpid2'
>>>>> 2017-10-24 17:13:43ERR(/Stage[main]/Apt::Update/Exec[apt_upda
Hi,
Yes, execution expired, means that it could not build an image within
required period of time.
The message you see can be used to build an image (copy paste into console
"command"), also there is a file with logs /var/log/fuel-agent-env-1.log,
which you can use to try to identify where the
Hi Jim,
It's possible to change the amount of space required for base system, but
it will require to change partitioning schema in release model.
You can retrieve it from Nailgun using:
curl -H "X-Auth-Token: $(fuel token)"
http://172.29.194.19:8000/api/v1/releases// | python -m
json.tool >
Hi,
Try following this guide:
https://docs.mirantis.com/openstack/fuel/fuel-7.0/operations.html#howto-backup-and-restore-fuel-master
Thanks,
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Raja T Nair wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Can somebody help me with info on how to migrate OR
Hi,
I've never tried installing 11 version, but this looks suspicious:
fuelmenu=10.0.0
I think it should be version 11, not 10.
Thanks,
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Tomas Brännström <
tomas.a.brannst...@tieto.com> wrote:
> Hi
> I'm trying to install the Fuel 11 release in a Virtualbox VM,
r.
>
> I checked all of the logs in /var/log/nailgun and none of them indicate
> any errors that I can see. There are also plenty of nailgun related
> processes running on the Fuel server.
>
> On 04/05/2017 10:14 AM, Evgeniy L wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Coul
Hi,
Could you please elaborate on the issue? What do you see after reset? How
does consequent deployment fail?
Thanks,
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Waqas Riaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know why Fuel's Reset Environment feature never works?
> The deployment after
Hi,
Could you please clarify, do you receive this error in the UI? What do you
mean by "save any changes"?
I'm not sure if ranges can cause such behavior, please see logs
"/var/log/nailgun/app.log" and "/var/log/nailgun/api.log" for any
errors/python tracebacks.
Thanks,
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at
ore thing can we add more services to already added nodes?
>
> Or we have to scale down add services and again scale up?
>
> On Mar 30, 2017 9:12 PM, "Evgeniy L" <e...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> The repository contains packages important for OpenStack installation, as
&
src 192.168.0.5*
>> *192.168.1.0/24 <http://192.168.1.0/24> dev br-storage proto kernel
>> scope link src 192.168.1.3*
>>
>> Default route goes to br-mgmt which is tagged vlan and does not go to
>> internet. Public interface does not come up for compute node whe
gt; `sync_if_needed'*
>>
>> *2017-03-27 17:18:57 ERR
>> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/puppet/transaction/resource_harness.rb:204:in
>> `sync'*
>>
>> *2017-03-27 17:18:57 ERR
>> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/puppet/property.rb:581:in `sync'*
>>
>> *2017
Hi,
*netconfig* task is responsible for network configuration.
*21* - specifies a node id, where task failed, use `fuel node | grep 21` to
find ip address of the node, go to the node using ssh and see results of
puppet execution "/var/log/puppet.log".
Thanks,
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:56 AM,
Hi,
There is a parameter reboot_timeout in /etc/astute/astuted.conf file on
Fuel node.
But there were some changes in provisioning process in latest versions, so
I'm not 100% sure that it will help.
Thanks,
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Vimal Kumar wrote:
> 2017-03-17
ery limited by my remote-access
> technology in terms of copy-pasting things. If you really need additional
> feedback, I'll do my best to give you the full output)
>
>
> Regards
> --
> *De :* Evgeniy L <e...@mirantis.com>
> *Envoyé :* 10 f
sion.)
>
> After that, rebuild the new bootstrap and environment images, then driver
> successfully updated.
>
> Thanks for the advice, really appreciate!
>
> Eddie.
>
> 2017-02-11 6:25 GMT+08:00 Evgeniy L <e...@mirantis.com>:
>
>> You have several opti
gt; > WSGIProcessGroup cobbler_web
> > WSGIPassAuthorization On
>
>
> At this point, I am rather clueless and am starting to wonder if I am not
> breaking the OS further by stabbing in the dark. I wonder if this is
> leading anywhere, or whether I should just restart the Fuel
Hi Gregory,
What version of Fuel do you use?
I'm not that familiar with openstack puppet library, can help only with
last question, you can override parameters using fuel Nailgun extension
which allows to override settings generated by Nailgun [1], these changes
can be applied by redeploying the
e
> into a repository that inside a Fuel Master node. And add package name into
> the installation list so that DKMS module will install during bootstrap
> image or environment image build.
>
> Is that feasible?
>
> Thanks,
> Eddie.
>
> 2017-02-08 2:18 GMT+08:00 Evge
Hi,
Bootstrap image is used only when node is in discovery state (before
provisioning is done), when you send nodes for provisioning, Fuel builds an
image using repository from environment configuration, after the image is
built, it reuses it for future deployments you can find details in
Hi,
Try to access UI using "curl" from your machine and from Fuel Master:
1. If it's not available from your machine but available from Fuel Master,
make sure that your network is configured correctly use regular
troubleshooting techniques for that ping/traceroute/tcpdump.
2. If it's not
Hi Russel,
Sorry for late response, there are different types of errors in 8.0 Fuel
(nodes->error_type field in db), if error caused by provisioning, those
nodes which have state=error, error_type=provision, will be re-provisioned,
with possible data lose, those node which failed to deploy
+1 to Lukasz.
-1 to the proposal, we had it this way for a quite some time, and it was
not good for the project (as Lukasz pointed out), why should a person who
merges the code to the library have an access to merge the code to
Nailgun/Astute without proper expertise. Those are different areas
Hi Dmitry,
It depends, but usually it takes half of working time to do reviews, I'm
not sure if we can assume 25-30%, also finding a good reviewer usually is
much harder than a person who can write the code, so it would be much more
productive to encourage people to spend as much time as they can
Hi Irina,
I fully support the idea of creating separate launchpad project for each
plugin, because plugins have different release cycles and different teams
who support them.
Fuel Plugin documentation [2] has to be updated with information for plugin
developers (how to setup new project) and for
> necessary to merge such custom things into Ironic tree. Happily, Ironic
> is
> > smart enough to consume drivers using stevedore. About ironic-inspector
> > the case is the same. Whether we are going to run it inside 'user
> instance'
> > or inside ramdisk it does not affect
ecause Shotgun is a generic
> tool. Please review these [1], [2].
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/298603
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/298615
>
>
> Btw, one of the ideas was to use Fuel task capabilities
> to gather diagnostic snapshot.
>
> Vladimir Koz
Hi, no problem from my side.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I'd like to request workrooms sessions swap.
>
> We have a session about Fuel/Ironic integration and I'd like
> this session not to overlap with Ironic
Hi,
Problems which I see with current Shotgun are:
1. Luck of parallelism, so it's not going to fetch data fast enough from
medium/big clouds.
2. There should be an easy way to run it manually (it's possible, but there
is no ready-to-use config), it would be really helpful in case if
Hi,
I'm not sure if it's a right place to continue this discussion, but if
there are doubts that such role is needed, we should not wait for another
half a year to drop it.
Also I'm not sure if a single engineer (or two engineers) can handle
majority of upcoming patches + specs + meetings around
Hi Roman,
>> reasonable to just install it from PyPi (first we need to release
Nailgun to PyPi)
Yes there will be dependencies, but there should be a way to test core
extensions (those which go to standard Fuel build) from master (or any
other branch), so installing from pypi is not always an
Hi,
I would like to bring up discussion on Bareon [0] and Ironic integration
and plans for the future.
But first let me provide background information on the topic. Bareon is
partitioning/provisioning system [1] which is based on Fuel-agent [2],
currently it's in active development and will be
Hi, here is a weekly update from Bareon team.
1. Extensions testing procedure in Fuel (required for Bareon integration).
1.1. Spec is still in progress [0].
1.2. Email was sent [1] to figure out the best way to do it in OpenStack
Infra, we would appreciate for any help on that.
2. Bareon dynamic
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 01:39 PM, Evgeniy L wrote:
>
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>> I can try to provide you description on what current Nailgun agent is,
>> and what are potential requirements
Hi Dmitry,
I can try to provide you description on what current Nailgun agent is, and
what are potential requirements we may need from HW discovery system.
Nailgun agent is a one-file Ruby script [0] which is periodically run under
cron. It collects information about HW using ohai [1], plus it
Hi,
We've been working on networking modularisation, during this activity
Nailgun is being fixed [0] in order to provide better layer boundary
between network related code and the rest of the system.
The purpose of this email is:
1. To make sure that this activity is known in Fuel team.
2. To
Hi Alexander, thanks for bringing this up.
>From your list of problems the only problem which I see is 1st, 2nd and 3rd
are solvable even with current implementation.
Also I don't think that we should continue developing our own HW discovery
mechanism, we should consider switching to
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Evgeniy L <e...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hi, here is update from Bareon team.
> 1. The team was actively helping with reviews/debugging/triage/designs for
> Fuel 9.0 release [0-6].2. Changing deployment data with extensions, the
> code is merged [7],
Hi, here is update from Bareon team.
1. The team was actively helping with reviews/debugging/triage/designs for
Fuel 9.0 release [0-6].2. Changing deployment data with extensions, the
code is merged [7], also bug is fixed [8].3. Extensions testing procedure
spec is still in progress [9].4. Dynamic
Hi Mike, thanks for clarification.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Mike Scherbakov
wrote:
> Thank you for comments folks.
> Clarifications, with the feedback incorporated:
> 1) We can install plugin developed against 8 to Fuel Mitaka (9). But it
> won't appear in the
Hi,
+1, it's very hard to use current representation of logs for debugging,
everybody goes to the node and tries to find required logs, instead of
reimplementing debugging friendly tool it would be better to get something
ready to use on the master.
Thanks,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:05 PM,
ramework for every change to the framework, so that we can
> have
> > -1 right away if something goes wrong.
> >
> > I've started separate thread on general thoughts about backward
> > compatibility and multiple releases support, which actually affects
> > examples: [1
Hi Mike, comments are inline.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Mike Scherbakov
wrote:
> Hi folks,
> in order to make a decision whether we need to support example plugins,
> and if actually need them [1], I'd suggest to discuss more common things
> about plugins.
>
>
coverage?
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Evgeniy L <e...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> Ilya,
>>
>> What do you mean by "templates" the plugin which is create by just "fpb
>> --create plugin-name"?
>> It doesn't cover enough, package inst
Ilya,
What do you mean by "templates" the plugin which is create by just "fpb
--create plugin-name"?
It doesn't cover enough, package installation and all range of tasks
executions.
Thanks,
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Ilya Kutukov wrote:
> Igor, i completely agree,
Hi,
Plugin examples mustn't be removed, those plugins are part of integration
tests for fuel plugin builder, which should be able to build any version of
plugin.
So there are two ways to solve the problem:
1. Before test run update compatibility matrix for plugins automatically.
2. Continue
Hi,
Thank you for your work, really happy to see it done. So as far as I can
see from now on in fuel-web repository we have only Nailgun project. Is it
correct?
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> We are ready for moving
Hi Jedrzej,
>> Maybe instead blueprint in 1st step should we create full blown
fuel-spec?
If there is anything to be discussed in implementation, or there are
different options to do it, it's better to have blueprint and spec, so
everybody will be able to see what the integration looks like.
dae...@mirantis.com
> wrote:
> If the spec is not going to require code changes in 9.0/Mitaka, why not
> simply target it for 10.0/Newton?
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 05:21:55PM +0300, Evgeniy L wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have a spec where we are trying to do research and d
Hi,
We have a spec where we are trying to do research and describe how we are
going to test extensions [0], we will not be able to land it before feature
freeze, so should we get feature freeze exception for it? Or it will not be
a problem to merge it even after FF?
The spec itself is more about
Hi,
Here is weekly update from Bareon team.
1. 3 specs from Cray team were merged [0], roadmap was properly adjusted [1]
2. Changing deployment data using extensions in Nailgun [2], spec is
merged, code is on review [3]
3. Extensions testing procedure, spec is in progress [4]
4. Dynamic
Hi,
+1 to Igor, plugin developer should be able to granularly define what
she/he wants to be executed on the node, without assumptions from our side.
`exclude` - field doesn't look like a good solution to me, it will be hard
to support and migrate plugins to newer version OpenStack release.
I
Hi Alexander,
I was trying to trace the change and found 3 year old commit, yes it's hard
to recover the reason [0].
So what we should ask is what is a right way to calculate lvm metadata size
and change this behaviour.
I would suggest at least explicitly set metadata size on Nailgun side to
the
Hi,
I have some comments on CI for plugins, currently there is a good
instruction on how to install your own CI and using fuel-qa write your own
tests [0], since just running BVT is not enough to make sure that plugin
works, we should provide a way for a plugin developer to easily extend
That is awesome, happy to finally see it enabled!
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Anastasia Urlapova
wrote:
> Aleksey, great news!
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Alexey Shtokolov > wrote:
>
>> Fuelers,
>>
>> Task based deployment engine
Hi,
After the discussion with some folks, we agreed that it might be useful for
the community to start sending weekly updates on what Bareon team is
working on and what is our progress.
So here is a first weekly update from Bareon team.
1. Data pipelines for Nailgun integration (changing
ould you please clarify what
multi-package is?
Thanks,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Ilya Kutukov <ikutu...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Evgeniy L <e...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> Ilya,
>>
>> What do you mean by "d
ve some
things which are related to the deployment specified in the root and some
in specific release.
There is consistent mechanism to specify such kind of things, lets just use
it.
Thanks,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Ilya Kutukov <ikutu...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb
Ilya,
>> My opinion that i've seen no example of multiple software of plugins
versions shipped in one package or other form of bundle. Its not a common
practice.
With plugins we extend Fuel capabilities, which supports multiple operating
system releases, so it's absolutely natural to extend
Sorry for the typo "s/I can shade more light/I can shed more light/"
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Evgeniy L <e...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As an author of this part of pluggable architecture I can shade more light
> on why it was implemented this way and w
+1
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> +1 to enable it ASAP.
>
> It will also affect our deployment tests (~1 hour vs. ~2.5 hours).
>
> Vladimir Kozhukalov
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Bulat Gaifullin
> wrote:
+1
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Igor Kalnitsky
wrote:
> Hey Fuelers,
>
> I'd like to nominate Fedor Zhadaev for the fuel-menu-core team.
> Fedor's doing good review with detailed feedback [1], and has
> contributes over 20 patches during Mitaka release cycle [2].
>
Hi,
Some time ago we started Bareon project [1], and now we have some fixes
landed to
fuel-agent only, the question is what are the best practises on keeping two
repos in sync
with possibility to resolve conflicts manually? Cherry-picking patches
manually doesn't look
like the most error prone
om>
wrote:
> Thanks Evgeniy.
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Evgeniy L <e...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> As far as I know it's expected behaviour (at least for the current
>> release), and it's expected that user reruns deployment on requir
Hi Simon,
As far as I know it's expected behaviour (at least for the current
release), and it's expected that user reruns deployment on required nodes
using fuel cli, in order to install plugin on a live environment.
It depends on specific role, but "update_required" field may help you, it
can be
Hi,
In addition I've generated several examples in order to show how current
prototype allocates the volumes [0].
Thanks,
[0] http://bareon-allocator.readthedocs.org/en/latest/examples.html
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Evgeniy L <e...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hi Artur,
>
>
allocate a single volume on ssd and hdd
>
>
> Best regards,
> Svechnikov Artur
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Evgeniy L <e...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> For the last several weeks I've been working on algorithm (and prototype)
>> for dyna
Hi,
For the last several weeks I've been working on algorithm (and prototype)
for dynamic allocation of volumes on disks.
I have some results [0] and would like to ask you to review it and provide
some feedback.
Our plan is to implement it as an external driver for Bareon [1].
Thanks,
[0]
Hi,
You should probably talk to infra team on this issue #openstack-infra
channel.
I see several ways what can be done here:
1. recreate the repo
2. create a repo with different name
Also there is possibility to remove from the commit those files and push
using --force,
but it's a very bad
te:
>
>> I agree with Evgeny: from work organization it would more optimal to have
>> 2 repos. API and system facing programming are completely different
>> domains, requiring different skill sets. In my opinion separation would
>> lower the entry barriers.
>>
>>
Hi,
We mustn't touch Nailgun's logic, otherwise after upgrade user won't be able
to manage her/his old nova Cluster. So lets just remove it from UI.
Also as far as I know we should provide a way to manage old clusters not
for a release, but for a couple of years.
Thanks,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at
ro' having ConfigDB separate from Solar is that it will
> simplify transition from current Fuel architecture by breaking it into more
> definite stages and reducing the number of components Solar have to be
> integrated with.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Oleg Gelbukh
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 20
>
> The point is that for Solar integration, we still need integration points,
> and the less of them we have, the more simple the transition is going to
> be..
>
As described above, there will be a single integration point, data
processor.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Ole
Hi Andrew,
It doesn't look fair at all to say that we use Postgres specific feature
for no reasons
or as you said "just because we want".
For example we used Arrays which fits pretty well for our roles usage,
which improved
readability and performance.
Or try to fit into relational system
h additional efforts on fixing 2
>>> different environments. Let's just think from the point of development
>>> velocity here and at delay such changes for at least after NY. Because if
>>> we do it immediately after SCF there will be a whole bunch of holidays and
>>> Russian hol
Hi,
Some time ago, we’ve started a discussion [0] about Fuel modularisation
activity.
Due to unexpected circumstances POC has been delayed.
Regarding to partitioning/provisioning system, we have POC with a demo [1]
(thanks to Sylwester), which shows how the integration of Fuel and Bareon
[2] can
Hi,
Since older Postgres doesn't introduce bugs and it won't harm new features,
I would vote for downgrade to 9.2
The reasons are:
1. not to support own package for Centos (as far as I know 9.3 for Ubuntu
is already there)
2. should Fuel some day be a part of upstream Centos? If yes, or there is
y, and start production ready implementation
>
> For what reason do we need a separate repo? I thought API will be a
> part of bareon repo. Or bareon is just a provisioning agent, which
> will be driven by bareon-api?
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Evgeniy L <e...@mirantis.com>
We are happy to introduce Bareon [0], which is a fork of fuel_agent [1]
project which have been developed under Fuel’s umbrella.
Bareon provides flexible and data driven interface to perform actions
which are related to operating system installation. In contrary to standard
kickstart and preseed
Hi Dmitry,
I also don't think that we should duplicate the data in configdb,
because in this case there will be +2 additional interfaces which
will require to covert the data into configdb and after that from
configdb to Solar, which seems redundant overhead.
But we should be able to put the
+1 to Vladimir Kozhukalov,
Entire point of moving branches creation to SCF was to perform such changes
as
early as possible in the release, I see no reasons to wait for HCF.
Thanks,
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> -1
>
> We already
+1
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Anastasia Urlapova wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Roman Vyalov
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Aleksey Kasatkin > > wrote:
>>
>>> +1.
>>>
>>>
+1 It's really good job folks.
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Vladimir Kuklin
wrote:
> Fuelers
>
> I am thrilled to announce that task based deployment engine [0] has been
> just merged into Fuel master. We checked it against existing BVT test cases
> for regressions as
Hi Roman,
We've discussed it [1], so +1
[1]
https://openstack.nimeyo.com/67521/openstack-dev-fuel-dropping-python2-6-compatibility
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote:
> Fuelers,
>
> Since Mitaka OpenStack Infra has no resources to test python 2.6
com>
wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> In an effort to do some housekeeping, I clean up the list of core
> reviewers in Fuel.
>
> According to Stackalytics the following cores show a low contribution rate:
>
> # fuel-web [1]
>
> * Dmitry Shulyak
> * Evgeniy L
>
Hi,
During Fuel master migration to CentOS7 there was found a problem that tests
get failed [0] for python2.6
As far as I can see it's a common practise to drop python2.6 compatibility
[1],
shouldn't we switch tests to work with python2.7 instead of python2.6?
It looks like fuelclient will be
Hi Maciej, thank you for bringing this up,
+1, but we should discuss the limit, personally for me it's ok to review
400loc patches,
if the patch covers only one bug-fix/feature implementation.
So if everybody is agree, we should:
1. update contribution guide
2. create a task for *non-voting*
Thanks Igor, it's very helpful,
Also if you forget where to get the link, use the documentation [1].
I think something like that may also be useful for library and QA team.
Thanks,
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel#Development_related_links
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Igor
Hi,
I have several comments, just to make sure, that we are on the same page
here.
Current API calls for provisioning/deployment are used by developers and
fuel hackers,
and by design there was removed all validation. So shouldn't there be some
more
user friendly API calls which have validation?
he containers (such as puppet
>>>> manifest changes). There shouldn't be a need to back up the entire
>>>> containers.
>>>>
>>>> The information we would lose would include the IP configuration
>>>> interfaces besides the one used for the Fuel PXE
+1 to Dmitry, thanks for pushing this activity Vladimir.
On Friday, 6 November 2015, Dmitry Pyzhov wrote:
> Great job! We are much closer to removal of fuel-web repo.
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
> vkozhuka...@mirantis.com
>
Javeria,
In your case, I think it's easier to generate config on the target node,
using puppet for example, since the information which you may need
is placed in /etc/astute.yaml file. Also it may be a problem to retrieve
all required information about the cluster, since API is protected with
onclusion.
>
>
> --
> Javeria
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Evgeniy L <e...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> Javeria,
>>
>> In your case, I think it's easier to generate config on the target node,
>> using puppet for example, since the information wh
Hi Vladimir,
Cannot say anything about 1st option, which is to use official Centos
scripts,
because I'm not familiar with the procedure, but since our installation is
not
really Centos, I have doubts that it's going to work correctly.
2nd option looks less risky. Also we should decide when to
Hi,
I believe we don't have any VirtualBox specific hacks, especially in terms
of
database configuration. By "development env" Vitaly meant fake UI, when
developer installs and configures the database by himself, without any iso
images, so probably his db is configured correctly with utf-8.
Also
Hi Javeria,
As far as I know there is no way to run the task on Fuel master host itself.
Since MCollective is installed in the container and tasks get executed using
MCollective, as a workaround you may try to ssh from the container to the
host.
Also I have several additional questions:
1. what
Hi,
The main reason why I think we should get all of the three states is we
don't know exactly if those plugins (which developer didn't specify) are
compatible or not, so we should not make any assumptions and prevent
the user from enabling any plugins she/he wants. The best we can do here
is to
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo