Hi y'all! The ongoing debate in the LBaaS group is whether the concept of a 'Loadbalancer' needs to exist as an entity. If it is decided that we need it, I'm sure it'll have a unique ID. (And please feel free to join the discussion on this as well, eh!)
Stephen On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Veera Reddy <veerare...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Good idea to have unique id for each entry of network functions. > So that we can configure multiple network function with different > configuration. > > > Regards, > Veera. > > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Srikanth Kumar Lingala < > srikanth.ling...@freescale.com> wrote: > >> Hi- >> >> In the existing Neutron, we have FWaaS, LBaaS, VPNaaS …etc. >> >> In FWaaS, each Firewall has its own UUID. >> >> It is good to have a unique ID [UUID] for LBaaS also. >> >> >> >> Please share your comments on the above. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Srikanth. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org >> Unsubscribe : >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org > Unsubscribe : > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > > -- Stephen Balukoff Blue Box Group, LLC (800)613-4305 x807
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack