Re: [openstack-dev] Running a skipped tempest test: test_connectivity_between_vms_on_different_networks

Hi Joseph, You can try deleting line[1] in tempest/tempest/scenario/test_network_basic_ops.py And rerunning the test [2] [1] https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/b6508962595dc1dcf351ec5a7316401786625fea/tempest/scenario/test_network_basic_ops.py#L416 [2] testr run

[openstack-dev] [infra]all release jobs failed

Hello, The Tricircle was put one tag this morning, and find that the publish-to-pypi job was failed. And I also find not only Tricircle, but seems all release jobs failed: http://status.openstack.org/zuul/ Would like to know how to re-trigger the publish-to-pypi job? Best Regards Chaoyi Huang

[openstack-dev] [tc]F2F talk in Barcelona for your concerns on Tricircle big-tent application

Hi TCs, Tricircle big-tent application (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/338796/) has just been resumed after the splitting and cleaning finished to make Tricircle being dedicated for networking automation across Neutron. All risks about API inconsistency/API re-implementation were removed due

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday Oct 20th at 9:00 UTC

Hello everyone, Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be Thursday, Oct 20th at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel. The agenda for the meeting can be found here:

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Summit preparation

Hi folks, Summit's around the corner! Even if you aren't going to be at the summit, we'd appreciate if you could go over the etherpads we're going to be using, to add your valuable input. They're all linked from https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-ocata-summit and in particular if you have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Propose a change of Zun core team

+1 for both. Regards, Shu Muto > -Original Message- > From: Kumari, Madhuri [mailto:madhuri.kum...@intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 12:33 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Propose a change of Zun core team

+1 for both. Shubham will be a great addition to team. Thanks! Madhuri From: Hongbin Lu [mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com] Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 2:49 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Zun]

Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack] [Keystone] How to use two keystone servers?

On 09/23/2016 11:03 AM, Alexandr Porunov wrote: Hello, I have next nodes: swift_proxy1 - 192.168.0.11 swift_proxy2 - 192.168.0.12 keystone1 - 192.168.0.21 keystone2 - 192.168.0.22 I wonder to know if it is possible to use two keystone servers if we use "uuid" or "fernet" tokens. Yes, you

[openstack-dev] [Heat] OpenStack Summit Barcelona: Heat Meetup (evening)

Hi everyone, We're planning to have an evening Heat contributors meetup in Barcelona Summit. We would like every contributor, ops, users join us and have fun. We need to decide which day of that week would be most suited for all of us. If you would like to attend, please put your name and

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]Tricircle splitting and cleaning completed

Hello, As all patches for Tricircle cleaning have been merged, the Tricircle splitting and cleaning in Tricircle repository was just completed. Now the cleaned source code is available: https://github.com/openstack/tricircle/ A new tag was also given for this milestone as the cleaned

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Performance concerns over all the new notifications

Matt Riedemann wrote: There are a lot of specs up for review in ocata related to adding new versioned notifications for operations that we didn't have notifications on before, like CRUD operations on resources like flavors and server groups. We've got a lot of legacy notifications for server

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Performance concerns over all the new notifications

Matt Riedemann wrote: There are a lot of specs up for review in ocata related to adding new versioned notifications for operations that we didn't have notifications on before, like CRUD operations on resources like flavors and server groups. We've got a lot of legacy notifications for server

Re: [Openstack] [Newton][Neutron][BGP] install bgp-agent/-plugin

Hi Bernhard, I believe https://github.com/openstack/neutron-dynamic-routing/blob/master/doc/source/installation.rst will offer you help. Thanks Vikram On Oct 19, 2016 5:22 PM, "Bernhard Krieger" wrote: > Hi, > > i am using Centos7/RDO/newton/. > > How do i install bgp

[openstack-dev] [nova] Performance concerns over all the new notifications

There are a lot of specs up for review in ocata related to adding new versioned notifications for operations that we didn't have notifications on before, like CRUD operations on resources like flavors and server groups. We've got a lot of legacy notifications for server actions, like

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Propose a change of Zun core team

+1 for both. 2016-10-20 5:18 GMT+08:00 Hongbin Lu : > Hi team, > > > > I am going to propose an exchange of the core team membership as below: > > > > + Shubham Kumar Sharma (shubham) > > - Chandan Kumar (chandankumar) > > > > Shubham contributed a lot for the container

[openstack-dev] 答复: Re: [vitrage][aodh] about aodh notifier to create a event alarm

Hi Gordon Chung, Could you please tell me why adding another notification topic is not a good choice? Thanks~ BR, dwj "Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL)" 2016-10-19 16:20 请答复 给 "OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)"

Re: [openstack-dev] Endpoint structure: a free-for-all

On 10/19/2016 04:22 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: I personally thought long-term we wanted unversioned endpoints in the service catalog, and if you want to do version discovery, you do a GET on a particular service's endpoint URL in the service catalog, and that returns the list of available API

[openstack-dev] [trove] FW: Your draft logo & a sneak peek

I know of no other way to share this with the Trove team . Here's our logo (a draft of it at least). The rest of the email (below) from Heidi has more details about appropriate use at this stage. Thanks, -amrith From: Heidi Joy Tretheway [mailto:heidi...@openstack.org] Sent:

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][VMT][Security] Glance coresec reorg

On 2016-10-18 22:22:28 + (+), Brian Rosmaita wrote: > Thus, the main point of this email is to propose Ian Cordasco and Erno > Kuvaja as new members of the Glance coresec team. They've both been > Glance cores for several cycles, have a broad knowledge of the software > and team,

[Openstack] [Neutron] retiring python-neutron-pd-driver

To whom it may concern, I have started the procedure [1] to retire project [2]. If you are affected by this, this is the last opportunity to provide feedback. That said, users should be able to use the in tree version of dibbler as documented in [3]. Cheers, Armando [1]

[Openstack-operators] [Neutron] retiring python-neutron-pd-driver

To whom it may concern, I have started the procedure [1] to retire project [2]. If you are affected by this, this is the last opportunity to provide feedback. That said, users should be able to use the in tree version of dibbler as documented in [3]. Cheers, Armando [1]

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] retiring python-neutron-pd-driver

To whom it may concern, I have started the procedure [1] to retire project [2]. If you are affected by this, this is the last opportunity to provide feedback. That said, users should be able to use the in tree version of dibbler as documented in [3]. Cheers, Armando [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] Endpoint structure: a free-for-all

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: ... > > This started back in August when it came up that we didn't know where > that Keystone v3 endpoint was. After talking with a few people, Steve > Martinelli mentioned that at least as of then, hitting the unversioned >

Re: [openstack-dev] Endpoint structure: a free-for-all

On 10/19/2016 3:22 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 10/19/2016 2:27 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 10/19/2016 01:40 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 10/19/2016 05:32

[openstack-dev] [nova] Draft mascot/logo

I just received a draft version of our project logo. A final version will be ready for us before the Project Team Gathering in February. Before they make our logo final, they want to be sure we're happy with our mascot. We can discuss any concerns in Barcelona and you can also provide direct

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Propose a change of Zun core team

Hi team, I am going to propose an exchange of the core team membership as below: + Shubham Kumar Sharma (shubham) - Chandan Kumar (chandankumar) Shubham contributed a lot for the container image feature and active on reviews and IRC. I think he is a good addition to the core team. Chandan

[openstack-dev] [lbaas] [octavia] Next LBaaS/Octavia meeting will be November 9th

Hi OpenStack Devs, Since a large number of team members are attending the OpenStack Summit, we have decided to cancel the next two LBaaS/Octavia IRC meetings. We will resume our regular meetings November 9th. Michael __

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo][openstack-ansible] DB deadlocks, Mitaka, and You

On 10/19/2016 9:47 AM, Carter, Kevin wrote: Hi Matt and thanks for the reply, We do have that commit as found here: [ https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/dd30603f91e6fd3d1a4db452f20a51ba8820e1f4/nova/db/sqlalchemy/api.py#L1846 ]. If there's anything you'd like to see as we're trying to

Re: [openstack-dev] Endpoint structure: a free-for-all

On 10/19/2016 2:27 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 10/19/2016 01:40 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 10/19/2016 05:32 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: I'm currently facing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron team social event in Barcelona

+1 On 14 October 2016 at 11:30, Miguel Lavalle wrote: > Dear Neutrinos, > > I am organizing a social event for the team on Thursday 27th at 19:30. > After doing some Google research, I am proposing Raco de la Vila, which is > located in Poblenou:

[Openstack] Name missing in Contributors list of OpenStack release webpage

Hi, Myself contributed to multiple openstack projects during Mitaka & Newton but it seems my name was missing in “Contributors” list @ http://www.openstack.org/software/newton/ & http://www.openstack.org/software/mitaka/ But I am able to see my contributions for LOC, reviews, Filed Bugs etc

[openstack-dev] Running a skipped tempest test: test_connectivity_between_vms_on_different_networks

Hello everyone, Is there a way to force this tempest test to run? tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops.TestNetworkBasicOps.test_connectivity_between_vms_on_different_networks Currently, I'm trying to run the next command, which is followed by the next outputץ Thanks for any help, Joseph. *

[openstack-dev] FW: Your draft logo & a sneak peek

Hellou, I just received a draft version of our project logo, using the mascot we selected together. A final version (and some cool swag) will be ready for us before the Project Team Gathering in February. Before they make our logo final, they want to be sure we're happy with our mascot. We

Re: [openstack-dev] Endpoint structure: a free-for-all

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 10/19/2016 01:40 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: >>> On 10/19/2016 05:32 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: I'm currently facing what looks more and more like

[openstack-dev] Project mascot logos - sneak peek

Hi Developers, Thanks for waiting patiently for news on your project logos! Our team of illustrators has been working hard on nearly 60 illustrations, and we have a sneak peek for you here: https://youtu.be/JmMTCWyY8Y4 I'm reaching out to the PTLs individually

[openstack-dev] [Magnum] Draft logo & a sneak peek

Hi team, Please find below for the draft of Magnum mascot. Best regards, Hongbin From: Heidi Joy Tretheway [mailto:heidi...@openstack.org] Sent: October-19-16 2:54 PM To: Hongbin Lu Subject: Your draft logo & a sneak peek Hi Hongbin, We're excited to show you the draft version of your project

[openstack-dev] Does anyone use the proxy_token/proxy_tenant_id stuff in the various clients?

python-novaclient has these proxy_token and proxy_tenant_id kwargs available when constructing the client, added way back in 2011 with no docs or tests: https://github.com/openstack/python-novaclient/commit/2c3a865f6b408d85aaeaafafd9ff9cdcee5d8cb4 Those have been copied into the various other

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Nova][icehouse]Any way to rotating log by size

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Sean M. Collins wrote: > Zhang, Peng wrote: > > [logger_root] > > level = DEBUG > > > So, you're setting the logging to level to DEBUG - if I understand > correctly. In a production environment that is going to fill up your > disks very

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][puppet] Spine/Leaf: Adding Multiple Subnets to ironic-inspector-dnsmasq

On 10/19/2016 10:33 AM, Dan Sneddon wrote: > I am doing research to support the spec for TripleO deployment on > routed networks [1]. I would like some input on how to represent > multiple subnet ranges for the provisioning network in undercloud.conf. > > The Ironic Inspector dnsmasq service is

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][puppet] Spine/Leaf: Adding Multiple Subnets to ironic-inspector-dnsmasq

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Dan Sneddon wrote: > I am doing research to support the spec for TripleO deployment on > routed networks [1]. I would like some input on how to represent > multiple subnet ranges for the provisioning network in undercloud.conf. > > The Ironic

Re: [openstack-dev] Endpoint structure: a free-for-all

On 10/19/2016 01:40 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: >> On 10/19/2016 05:32 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: >>> >>> I'm currently facing what looks more and more like an impossible >>> problem in determining the root of each service on a

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Neutron][LBaaS] Architecture/Wiring for LBaaS service extension

Also you should take a look into octavia documentation [1]. Please remember that we’re in process of killing Neutron-LBaaS v2 (v1 already removed) and we’re working on making Octavia default LBaaS in OpenStack. For now you still need to use nlbaas to use Octavia - which is a reference driver

Re: [openstack-dev] Endpoint structure: a free-for-all

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 10/19/2016 05:32 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: >> >> I'm currently facing what looks more and more like an impossible >> problem in determining the root of each service on a given cloud. It >> is apparently a free-for-all in

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][puppet] Spine/Leaf: Adding Multiple Subnets to ironic-inspector-dnsmasq

I am doing research to support the spec for TripleO deployment on routed networks [1]. I would like some input on how to represent multiple subnet ranges for the provisioning network in undercloud.conf. The Ironic Inspector dnsmasq service is currently configured using the puppet-ironic module,

[openstack-dev] [architecture] Cancelling next two Architecture Working Group IRC meetings

With many preparing to travel to the summit, and our summit fishbowl session next week [1] we're going to go ahead and cancel this week and next week's Architecture WG IRC meetings. For those attending the summit, I hope to see you all there with your proposals for Architecture WG topics. And for

Re: [openstack-dev] Endpoint structure: a free-for-all

On 10/19/2016 10:32 AM, Brian Curtin wrote: I'm currently facing what looks more and more like an impossible problem in determining the root of each service on a given cloud. It is apparently a free-for-all in how endpoints can be structured, and I think we're out of ways to approach it that

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Neutron][LBaaS] Architecture/Wiring for LBaaS service extension

Does this [1] help? [1] http://docs.openstack.org/newton/networking-guide/config-lbaas.html On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Adam Lawson wrote: > Greetings fellow stackers. > > So I found the list of service extensions [1,] the modular architecture > [2] and info re the

Re: [openstack-dev] Endpoint structure: a free-for-all

On 10/19/2016 05:32 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: I'm currently facing what looks more and more like an impossible problem in determining the root of each service on a given cloud. It is apparently a free-for-all in how endpoints can be structured, and I think we're out of ways to approach it that

[openstack-dev] [Winstackers][Hyper-V] 26.10.2016 Hyper-V IRC meeting cancelled

Hello! Just a heads-up, the 26.10.2016's Hyper-V IRC meeting is cancelled due to the OpenStack Summit. We do, however, have a Winstackers work session on Wednesday, October 26, 3:05pm-3:45pm at AC Hotel - P3 - Eixample. Feel free to join us then and there! For more details about the work

[openstack-dev] [release][fuel][tripleo][kolla][ansible] newton finals for cycle-trailing projects

I have prepared a proposed set of tags for the final releases for cycle-trailing projects that are using pre-release versions [1]. Please review the tags for your deliverables and ensure they are correct. The release team will approve and tag the releases by the end of the day tomorrow. Thanks!

[Openstack-operators] [telecom-nfv] Barcelona Sessions

Hi All, There are two operator related telecom/nfv working sessions at the Barcelona summit. Thanks to the User Committee and Ops teams for allowing us the time for both these sessions. * Tuesday Ops Summit session Session -

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Nova][icehouse]Any way to rotating log by size

Zhang, Peng wrote: > [logger_root] > level = DEBUG So, you're setting the logging to level to DEBUG - if I understand correctly. In a production environment that is going to fill up your disks very quickly. Which is why even running cron hourly to rotate the files still results in a full disk.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] next meeting is a spooky one

lol, I'm definitely carving a special meeting pumpkin :) Cheers, milan st 19. 10. 2016 v 18:01 odesílatel Loo, Ruby napsal: > Hi, > > > > Since the Barcelona summit is next week, the Monday (Oct 24) ironic > meeting is cancelled. > > > > We'll have a spooky meeting the week

[openstack-dev] [designate] IRC Meetings - Canceled for the next 2 weeks

Hi All, With the Design Summit a week away, and having no agenda items, I suggest we skip the meeting this week, and as we will be in Spain next week, we will also be skipping that meeting. See you all in Barcelona, or at the meeting on the 2nd of November. Thanks, Graham

[openstack-dev] [ironic] next meeting is a spooky one

Hi, Since the Barcelona summit is next week, the Monday (Oct 24) ironic meeting is cancelled. We'll have a spooky meeting the week after (Oct 31). Feel free to come in costumes :) --ruby __ OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

Adam, One distinction i heard was that this is just a runtime dependency, hence my suggestion. Thanks, Dims On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Adam Harwell wrote: > Dims: that wasn't meant as hostile to you, though re-reading it kind of > sounds that way. > You were not the

[openstack-dev] Endpoint structure: a free-for-all

I'm currently facing what looks more and more like an impossible problem in determining the root of each service on a given cloud. It is apparently a free-for-all in how endpoints can be structured, and I think we're out of ways to approach it that catch all of the ways that all people can think

[Openstack] FOSDEM Virtualization & IaaS DevRoom

A Virtualization & IaaS DevRoom is planned for FOSDEM, and the CFP is available at http://www.ovirt.org/blog/2016/10/call-for-proposal-fosdem-2017/ I hope to see many of you there again this time. -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@redhat.com RDO Community Liaison http://rdoproject.org @RDOCommunity

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

Dims: that wasn't meant as hostile to you, though re-reading it kind of sounds that way. You were not the first in this thread to suggest bindep, and while your links are useful, I don't think it makes a lot of sense for our use case. I legitimately can't understand why this *one* dependency (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron team social event in Barcelona

+1 2016-10-19 19:55 GMT+09:00 Andreas Scheuring : > +1 > -- > - > Andreas > IRC: andreas_s > > > > On Di, 2016-10-18 at 16:18 -0700, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > > +1 > > Thanks for organizing this. > > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 01:30:57PM -0500, > > Miguel Lavalle

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo][openstack-ansible] DB deadlocks, Mitaka, and You

Hi Matt and thanks for the reply, We do have that commit as found here: [ https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/dd30603f91e6fd3d1a4db452f20a51ba8820e1f4/nova/db/sqlalchemy/api.py#L1846 ]. If there's anything you'd like to see as we're trying to figure this out I'd be happy to provide

[openstack-dev] [searchlight] Propose Zhenyu Zheng for Searchlight core

Hi, I'd like to propose Zhenyu Zheng (Kevin_Zheng on IRC) for Searchlight core. While he's most active on Nova, he's also been very active on Searchlight both in commits and reviews during the Newton release and into Ocata on Searchlight. Kevin's participated during the weekly meetings and

[openstack-announce] [new][telemetry] gnocchi 3.0.1 release

We are glowing to announce the release of: gnocchi 3.0.1: Metric as a Service Download the package from: https://tarballs.openstack.org/gnocchi/ For more details, please see below. Changes in gnocchi 3.0.0..3.0.1 --- a44d88f Fix incorrect EXTRA_FLAVOR in

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

We literally install every other dependency from pypi with requirements.txt, so I'm struggling understand why all the sudden we need to install this one as a binary, for our devstack specific script, when we are planning a move to a distro that doesn't even support binary packages? Should we

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][release] OpenStack-Ansible Newton RC4 available (Re: [openstack-ansible][release] OpenStack-Ansible Newton RC3 available)

Please test RC4, same details as below :) Thanks, Dims On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Hello everyone, > > A new release candidate for OpenStack Ansible for the end of the > Newton cycle is available! > > You can find the source code tarballs at: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

-Original Message- From: Adam Harwell Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: October 19, 2016 at 08:44:31 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [kolla][release] Kolla Newton RC3 available (Re: [kolla][release] Kolla Newton RC2 available)

Please test: https://tarballs.openstack.org/kolla/kolla-3.0.0.0rc3.tar.gz Thanks, Dims On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Hello everyone, > > A new release candidate for Kolla for the end of the Newton cycle > is available! You can find the source

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

Adam, Have you see this yet? http://docs.openstack.org/infra/bindep/readme.html#writing-requirements-files http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=platform=nope=bindep.txt= Thanks, Dims On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Adam Harwell wrote: > Yes, but we need to use SOMETHING

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

To reply more directly and clearly: On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:30 PM Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:41:16AM +, Adam Harwell wrote: > > I wonder if maybe it is not clear -- for us, gunicorn is a runtime > > dependency for our gate jobs to work, not a

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

Yes, but we need to use SOMETHING for our own devstack gate tests -- maybe it is easier to think of our devstack code as a "third party setup", and that it uses gunicorn for its DIB images (but not every deployer needs to). In this case, how do we include it? Devstack needs it to run our gate

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo][openstack-ansible] DB deadlocks, Mitaka, and You

On 10/19/2016 08:36 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: Hey Kevin, So just looking at the pastes you have here, I'm inclined to believe this is actually a bug in oslo_db/sqlalchemy. If you follow the trace, there's a PyMySQL InternalError not being handled inside of sqlalchemy. I'm not sure if SQLAlchemy

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

On 18/10/2016 19:57, Doug Wiegley wrote: > >> On Oct 18, 2016, at 12:42 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> >> Excerpts from Doug Wiegley's message of 2016-10-18 12:21:20 -0600: >>> On Oct 18, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts

[openstack-dev] [Murano] No meetings on Oct 25 and Nov 1 due to summit

Most of the team is going to attend summit, so there will be no meeting on Oct 25 I would also suggest skipping meeting on Nov 1, since afaik a lot of folks would still be travelling by that time (myself included). Unless someone’s volunteering to chair and has specific agenda — let’s skip Nov 1

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Add fuel-ccp-core group to fuel-ccp-ceph-core

Sorry for a mess up with links, right one are: [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1457,members [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1600,members [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/384913/ On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Kirill Proskurin

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

On 10/18/2016 08:25 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 10/18/2016 12:05 PM, Adam Harwell wrote: >> Inline comments. >> >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:38 AM Thomas Goirand > > wrote: >> >> On 10/18/2016 02:37 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: >> > On Oct 17, 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

On 10/18/2016 07:05 PM, Adam Harwell wrote: > What if operating systems would be the same? > > We still want to install from pypi, because we still want deployers to > build images for their cloud using our DIB elements. There is absolutely > no situation in which I can imagine we'd want to

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon]New feature: enable/disable port security

Hi Rob, > -Original Message- > From: Rob Cresswell [mailto:robert.cressw...@outlook.com] > Sent: 2016 október 19, szerda 13:49 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon]New feature:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo][openstack-ansible] DB deadlocks, Mitaka, and You

-Original Message- From: Carter, Kevin Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: October 18, 2016 at 21:18:13 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo][openstack-ansible] DB deadlocks, Mitaka, and You

On 10/18/2016 9:16 PM, Carter, Kevin wrote: Hello all, As some folks may know the OSIC cloud1 just upgraded to Mitaka last week (I know what's old is new again, sorry). Since the upgrade things have been running fairly smoothly however there's been one issue that has left me scratching my head.

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:26:51PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:41:16AM +, Adam Harwell wrote: > > I wonder if maybe it is not clear -- for us, gunicorn is a runtime > > dependency for our gate jobs to work, not a deploy dependency. > > Okay then frankly I'm deeply

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ansible][fuel][kolla][puppet][tripleo] proposed deadlines for cycle-trailing projects

Excerpts from Steven Dake (stdake)'s message of 2016-10-19 02:32:21 +: > Doug, > > Kolla rc3 is available in the queue by the hard deadline (more or less). I > have a quick Q - would I need to submit another 3.0.0 patch with the same git > commit id, or does the release team do that

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Deprecate VMware CI that uses nova-network

On 10/18/2016 11:38 PM, Sihan Wang wrote: Hi, We have added Nova upstream CI to use NSX, currently it is non-voting. After we test its stability, we will replace the novanet one. Thanks Sihan __ OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:41:16AM +, Adam Harwell wrote: > I wonder if maybe it is not clear -- for us, gunicorn is a runtime > dependency for our gate jobs to work, not a deploy dependency. Okay then frankly I'm deeply confused. Can we see the code that uses it? to understand why the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] FSM: stable states

Abraços, Rafael --- Marcus Rafael Xavier Laurentino Universidade Federal de Campina Grande Laboratório de Sistemas Distribuídos - Mensagem original - De: Yuriy Zveryanskyy Para: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Enviadas: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 07:02:30 -0300

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon]New feature: enable/disable port security

Thanks for the patch! For something of this size, a wishlist bug is usually adequate, perhaps with an API reference to help us review faster :) Rob On 19 October 2016 at 12:19, Gyorgy Szombathelyi > wrote: Hi!

[Openstack] [Newton][Neutron][BGP] install bgp-agent/-plugin

Hi, i am using Centos7/RDO/newton/. How do i install bgp (agent)? In Mitaka  you have to install openstack-neutron-bgp-dragent.x.rpm, but in newton no rpm is available. On controller node i get "neutron ImportError: Plugin 'bgp'

[OpenStack-Infra] Add fuel-ccp-core group to fuel-ccp-ceph-core

Hello Infra Team, Could you please add fuel-ccp-core[1] group to fuel-ccp-ceph-core group[2] ? We have convention that fuel-ccp-core group is included in core groups for all fuel-ccp-* repositories, and ceph[3] repo has no cores at this moment. [1]

[openstack-dev] [horizon]New feature: enable/disable port security

Hi! After I saw the allowed-address-pair handling is added to Horizon, I felt that completely enabling/disabling anti-spoofing rules would be a good addition, too, so I've create a patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/388611/ Don't know if it needs a blueprint, or other administration

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron team social event in Barcelona

+1 -- - Andreas IRC: andreas_s On Di, 2016-10-18 at 16:18 -0700, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > +1 > Thanks for organizing this. > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 01:30:57PM -0500, > Miguel Lavalle wrote: > > > Dear Neutrinos, > > > > I am organizing a social event for the

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][spec] Feedback wanted on TripleO real-time compute node proposal

Hi, I'd like to post a link to a blueprint/spec that I'm hoping to discuss at the upcoming summit. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-realtime https://review.openstack.org/388162 I'm new to both TripleO and OpenStack development. Any advice/hints/criticism is very much

[Openstack] How do a service indicate that it's up and running? "Who" does it talk to?

I have a bunch of services that won't go from 'Down' to 'Up'. I've restarted them a bunch of times and looked at the log files, but all seems ok! -- Michael Jackson is not going to buried or cremated but recycled into shopping bags so he can remain white, plastic and dangerous for kids to play

Re: [Openstack] Reverse proxy component

You are right. This is the schema: +--+ | | |OPENSTACK | +--+

[openstack-dev] [ironic] FSM: stable states

Hi, There is inconsistency of stable states definitions in the documentation and in the FSM code. Documentation defines stable states "which can be changed by external request" (and state diagram looks outdated), but FSM code which can be set as "target". Details:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Contributing a new fuel-plugin

Hi Omar You might want to follow basic OpenStack documentation here: http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/creators.html if you want to create a new project. For fuel plugins just put it into fuel namespace and call it something like 'fuel-plugin-'. If you want to contribute to the existing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron team social event in Barcelona

+1 Thank you, Miguel! Best regards, Yushiro Furukawa From: Miguel Lavalle [mailto:mig...@mlavalle.com] Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2016 3:31 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron team social event in Barcelona Dear Neutrinos, I am

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] No weekly meeting

Cool, wish I could join the next Summit~ Sean McGinnis 于2016年10月19日周三 下午4:57写道： > Hello all, > > I know there are a lot of folks travelling for the Summit already. There > are no agenda items added to the weekly meeting wiki, so I am going to > cancel this weeks meeting. >

Re: [Openstack] Reverse proxy component

Let me add a bit, By default lbaas manage ha proxy instances in your openstack, but it's just a matter of creating a proper driver if not existing, to manage a physical lb or an external service providing that. But an external service to your network will need anyhow a public ip on your VMs.

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] No weekly meeting

Hello all, I know there are a lot of folks travelling for the Summit already. There are no agenda items added to the weekly meeting wiki, so I am going to cancel this weeks meeting. If there are any important topics or things that need to be discussed prior to the Summit, please bring those up

Re: [Openstack] Reverse proxy component

Exactly, lbaas is part of neutron. Cheers, Federico Fede's mobile edition Dr. Federico Michele Facca Head of Martel Lab Martel Innovate Dorfstrasse 73 - 3073 Gümligen (Switzerland) 0041 78 807 58 38 0041 31 994 25 25 martel-innovate.com > Il giorno 19 ott 2016, alle ore 10:40, Jose Manuel

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-vpp]Introducing networking-vpp

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:30 AM Ian Wells wrote: > Sorry to waken an old thread, but I chose a perfect moment to go on > holiday... > > So yes: I don't entirely trust the way we use RabbitMQ, and that's largely > because what we're doing with it - distributing state, or

  1   2   >