Hi Leandro,
It is true that the majority of development work, and the majority of
deployments, happen with the libvirt+KVM combination however there are some
major deployments that use XenServer highly effectively.
Regarding Neutron support, yes there are a number of known areas where we need
Hello Leandro,
From my experience OpenStack + XenServer is really difficult to build,
but it *work*. Newest features like neutron, advanced cinder drivers,
XenServer pool's, etc is not working well. At least with XenServer 6.2
and Icehouse release. If you know both technologies and don't know
Thank you guys.
One last question: This 3 node setup is just a proof of concept of a bigger
architecture (with around 30 nodes). I personally would prefer use KVM, so
we can use Kilo and Neutron, but for some political reasons, we are really
pushed to use XenServer (no problem about XS itself, I
To: Mārtiņš Jakubovičs
Cc: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack] XenServer 6.5 or KVM
Thank you guys.
One last question: This 3 node setup is just a proof of concept of a bigger
architecture (with around 30 nodes). I personally would prefer use KVM, so we
can use Kilo and Neutron
: [Openstack] XenServer 6.5 or KVM
Thank you guys.
One last question: This 3 node setup is just a proof of concept of a bigger
architecture (with around 30 nodes). I personally would prefer use KVM, so we
can use Kilo and Neutron, but for some political reasons, we are really pushed
to use
Hi Guys,
I'm trying to setup a 3 node (controller, neutron and compute) Openstack
setup, but i'm having a lot of trouble regarding the XenServer(6.5) setup.
Looking around the internet for docs about XenServer as compute node, i've
got the impression that the main effort of OpenStack is use KVM
