Hi,
Over the last few days I have been battling with this script (I am only human).
Recently there was a nice change that removed the number of entries which helps
with the merges. One thing that I have encountered over the last 2 days is that
the pep8 passes with my environment and fails with
Hi,
Since the addition of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32966/ there have been a
number of failures with unit tests (sadly this is not consistent) but examples
are:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35189/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33504/
I have managed to reproduce this on a local
2013-7-26，3:11 pm，Tian, Shuangtai shuangtai.t...@intel.com Wrote:
Recently，generate_sample.sh had been changed . look the help.
For example, try run ./tools/config/generate_sample.sh -b ./ -p nova -o
./etc/nova and commit the changes in nova.conf.sample
I don't know why I can't run command as
On 07/25/2013 08:30 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
When you have so much state to maintain then aren't the APIs incorrect??
Yes, the EC2 APIs are incorrect in being silly and using ints for ids
for so many things, also for supporting people to make GET requests with
16k get strings. But there
Hi Folks,
Finally got around to looking at some of the things I've added to the V2 api
and wanted to move to V3 - and I'm confused about what is and isn't going to be
moved from being an extension. For example:
- I added the extended_floating_ip extension to allow an floating IP
to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/26/2013 05:35 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
Alex Meade wrote:
+1 to everything Russell just said and of course Blueprints for
this. One for #3 (changing from mox - Mock) would be good so
that anyone who is bored or finds this urgent can
Shawn, Dan,
What are the versions of ESX and vCenter that should work by the time
Havana gets out? Havana Trunk-ESX 4.1 and Havana Trunk-vSphere
4.1-ESX 4.1 do not seem to work. I was only able to get Havana
Trunk-vCenter 5.1-ESX 5.1 to work.
thanks,
dims
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Shawn
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
** **
I’m trying to add a v3 plugin as part of the scheduler hints API BP – but
although I’ve created the file in plugins/v3 and it looks OK compared to
all the others in there it doesn’t even get turned
On 25/07/13 19:07, Bartosz Górski wrote:
We want to start from something simple. At the beginning we are assuming
no dependencies between resources from different region. Our first use
case (the one on the wikipage) uses this assumptions. So this is why it
can be easily split on two separate
On 07/26/2013 09:49 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Hello,
Just letting you know all that we have now the swift functional tests
gating on jenkins .
- They are non-voting.
- They are run on devstack (i.e: not swaio).
- V2 and V1 are run (and configured) together on that devstack in that order.
-
Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On 07/23/2013 07:25 AM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote:
I still think counting lines of code is evil because it might encourage
some developers to write longer code just for statistics.
Data becomes evil when you decide to use them for evil purposes :) I
don't think that
Agreed, but the history portion of what you wrote that that takes us from
the beginning to where we are now today has all been implemented. That
portion I thought could be added to the project as it really tells a nice
narrative of why what you see in the keystone code base is actually there.
On 07/25/2013 04:21 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
Hi All,
We have recently hit some performance issues with nova-network. It
turns out the root cause of this was we do roughly 20 rootwrapped shell
commands, many inside of global locks.
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo/+bug/1199433)
It turns out
On 2013-07-26 10:39, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 07/26/2013 08:04 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/25/2013 08:30 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
When you have so much state to maintain then aren't the APIs
incorrect??
Yes, the EC2 APIs are incorrect in being silly and using ints for ids
for so many things, also
Fix proposed for the hostname conflict issue:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38837/
-Ben
On 2013-07-26 10:14, Ben Nemec wrote:
Okay, I found my problem. My dev vm's hostname is openstack, which
causes problems in _sanitize_defaults due to this:
elif s == socket.gethostname():
return
On 07/26/2013 12:26 PM, Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD - Corvallis)
wrote:
Adam,
Which Havana Blueprint provides support for the feature you mention in
your article below?
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/authentication-tied-to-token
It has been implemented, so it doesn't
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Brad Topol bto...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Agreed, but the history portion of what you wrote that that takes us from
the beginning to where we are now today has all been implemented. That
portion I thought could be added to the project as it really tells a nice
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-07-25 15:39:13 -0700:
On 26 July 2013 10:19, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Chris Jones wrote:
I agree with your analysis of the effects of the sudoers file and I
think it makes a great argument for recommending people run the main
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/25/2013 08:24 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
You mean process/forking API right?
Honestly I'd sort of think the whole limits.py that is this
rate-limiting could also be turned off by default (or a log warn message
occurs)
On 07/26/2013 01:55 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
It makes sense, though, if the data is going to be (potentially)
coming from separate databases. Is that any different for
sqlalchemy-migrate?
As far as tracking the separate migrations for the different schemas,
that's handled by running alembic
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/26/2013 01:55 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
It makes sense, though, if the data is going to be (potentially) coming
from separate databases. Is that any different for sqlalchemy-migrate?
As far as tracking the separate
On 07/26/2013 01:59 PM, Jonathan Proulx wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/25/2013 08:24 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
You mean process/forking API right?
Honestly I'd sort of think the whole limits.py
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:56 AM, stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Brian,
Firstly, thanks for all your great work here!
Some feedback:
1) Is there a clash with existing user properties?
For currently deployed systems a user may have an existing property 'foo:
bar'.
If we restrict
On 2013-07-26 12:38, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 07/26/2013 11:53 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-07-26 10:39, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 07/26/2013 08:04 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/25/2013 08:30 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
When you have so much state to maintain then aren't the APIs
incorrect??
Yes, the
Thank you.
From: Adam Young [mailto:ayo...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 9:54 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] A vision for Keystone
On 07/26/2013 12:26 PM, Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD - Corvallis) wrote:
Adam,
Which Havana Blueprint provides
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/25/2013 04:21 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
Hi All,
We have recently hit some performance issues with nova-network. It
turns out the root cause of this was we do roughly 20 rootwrapped shell
commands, many inside of
Hi folks
I got review comment from Salvatore about FSM management of resources
### Quote
management of PENDING statuses. It would be great if we find an
agreement across the LB, VPN, and FW extensions to handle them in the
same way. Doing it differently for each extension might confuse
So back at the Portland summit myself and Jun Park presented about some of
our difficulties scaling Openstack with the Folsom release:
http://www.openstack.org/summit/portland-2013/session-videos/presentation/using-openstack-in-a-traditional-hosting-environment
.
One of the main obstacles we ran
On Jul 26, 2013 5:53 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/26/2013 05:35 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
Alex Meade wrote:
+1 to everything Russell just said and of course Blueprints for
this. One for #3 (changing from mox -
I have just put up a review here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38897/
which should address the exercise.sh issues when n-cell is enabled. Hopefully
this works in the gate like it does for me locally. Then we can move on to
looking at tempest.
- Chris
On Jul 15, 2013, at 6:13 AM,
30 matches
Mail list logo
