Host not hypervisor I think; consider nova baremetal, where hypervisor
== machine that runs tftpd and makes IPMI calls, and host == place
where the user workload will execute.
-Rob
On 29 September 2013 17:52, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I have begun drafting a blueprint about more
I met the same problem, I hope the situation is getting better. What can I
help?
2013-09-29 07:05:55.248 | Traceback (most recent call last):
2013-09-29 07:05:55.248 | File
/home/jenkins/workspace/gate-nova-python27/nova/tests/api/openstack/compute/contrib/test_quantum_security_groups.py,
line
Hi,
Not related to the stable branches, but related to trunk. At the moment I am
working on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/47788/. This patch adds a timeout
to the access to the OVS database.
The neutron gate fails on this -
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote on 09/29/2013 02:21:28
AM:
Host not hypervisor I think; consider nova baremetal, where hypervisor
== machine that runs tftpd and makes IPMI calls, and host == place
where the user workload will execute.
In nova baremetal, is there still a
On 09/29/2013 01:02 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote on 09/29/2013 02:21:28 AM:
Host not hypervisor I think; consider nova baremetal, where hypervisor
== machine that runs tftpd and makes IPMI calls, and host == place
where the user workload will
Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote on 09/29/2013 01:38:26 PM:
On 09/29/2013 01:02 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote on 09/29/2013
02:21:28 AM:
Host not hypervisor I think; consider nova baremetal, where
hypervisor
== machine that runs tftpd
Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote on 29/09/2013 08:02:00 PM:
Another reason to prefer host is that we have other resources to
locate besides compute.
Good point. Another approach (not necessarily contradicting) could be to
specify the location as a property of host aggregate rather
Hi everyone,
We already created the blueprint for this feature below belore, if
Glance can use S3 MultiPart Upload REST API for the large objects in
future release as Amazon recommends it for the large object to be
uploaded, I believe that it's very useful for the customers and a good
thing for
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Masashi Ozawa moz...@cloudian.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
We already created the blueprint for this feature below belore, if
Glance can use S3 MultiPart Upload REST API for the large objects in
future release as Amazon recommends it for the large object to be
