I had the labels wrong - here's a slightly better link - http://bit.ly/1gdxYeg
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
Joe,
Looks like we may be a bit more stable now?
Short URL: http://bit.ly/18qq4q2
Long URL :
Pasting a few things from IRC here to fill out the context...
marun carl_baldwin: but according to markmcclain and salv-orlando,
it isn't possible to trivially use multiple workers for rpc because
processing rpc requests out of sequence can be dangerous
carl_baldwin marun: I think it is already
On 12/6/13 4:32 PM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote:
I hope I'm not re-opening worm cans here, and that's not my intent, but I
just wanted to get a little clarification in-line below:
On Dec 6, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Tim Schnell tim.schn...@rackspace.com
wrote:
To resolve this
Just an FYI that I've submitted a pull request [1] to replace Celery
with oslo.messaging.
wow. That was quick!
/me is impressed
Ha! Just trying to put the polish on! Thanks for the feedback and hope it is a
step in the right direction. I'll look to add testing for it on Monday or
before
On 12/06/2013 01:38 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2013-12-05 21:32:54 -0800:
On 12/05/2013 04:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Andrew Plunk's message of 2013-12-05 12:42:49
-0800:
Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2013-12-05 09:05:44
-0800:
On Dec
On 12/06/2013 02:36 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-12-04 14:19:44 -0800:
So - what about us capturing this information outside the image: we
can create a uuid for the build, and write a file in the image with
that uuid, and outside the image we can write:
On 7 December 2013 09:31, Liz Blanchard lsure...@redhat.com wrote:
This list is great, thanks very much for taking the time to write this up! I
think a big part of the User Experience design is to take a step back and
understand the requirements from an end user's point of view…what would
On 7 December 2013 10:55, Matt Wagner matt.wag...@redhat.com wrote:
The 'management node' here is the undercloud node that Anna is
interacting with, as I understand it. (Someone correct me if I'm wrong.)
So it's not a bad idea to show its status, but I guess the mere fact
that she's using it
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2013-12-06 16:46:24 -0800:
On 12/06/2013 01:38 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2013-12-05 21:32:54 -0800:
On 12/05/2013 04:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Andrew Plunk's message of 2013-12-05 12:42:49
-0800:
Thanks for the comments and questions! I fully expect that this list of
requirements
will need to be fleshed out, refined, and heavily modified, so the more the
merrier.
Comments inline:
*** Requirements are assumed to be targeted for Icehouse, unless marked
otherwise:
(M) - Maybe
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2013-12-06 12:27:10 -0800:
Another idea that I'll put up for consideration (since I work with the
cloud-init codebase also).
Cloud-init[1] which currently does lots of little useful initialization
types of activities (similar to the racker agents
Excerpts from Sandy Walsh's message of 2013-12-06 12:12:16 -0800:
On 12/06/2013 03:45 PM, Dmitry Mescheryakov wrote:
Hello all,
We would like to push further the discussion on unified guest agent. You
may find the details of our proposal at [1].
Also let me clarify why we started
Agreed,
Chatting earlier today on #cloud-init about all of this I think scott convinced
me that maybe we (the joint we in the community at large) should think about
asking ourselves what do we really want a guest agent for/to do?
If it's for software installation or user management then aren't
101 - 113 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
