Hi Bruce,
Bruce Montague bruce_monta...@symantec.com wrote on 02/23/2014 03:35:10
AM:
Hi, regarding the proposed Cinder volume replication patch,
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64026 :
The replication driver methods are create_replica(), swap_replica(),
delete_replica(),
Hi,
Plesae note that regarding the Vmware driver the maintenance mode only works
with the ESX driver and not the VC driver. For the VC driver there is a patch
in review - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72143/
Thanks
Gary
From: Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.commailto:jay.lau@gmail.com
On 2/19/14 10:31 PM, Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah it's pip weirdness where things falls apart because of version
cap. It's
basically installing bin/swift from 1.9 when it sees the version
requirement
but it leaves everything in python-swiftclient namespace from master.
So I've
On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 09:14 +0800, Jay Lau wrote:
So there is no need to implement libvirt driver for the
host_maintenance_mode API as host_maintenance_mode is mainly for
VMWare and XenServer, also we can use evacuate and os-services/disable
for libvirt host maintain, right?
At a minimum, can
On 22/02/14 06:42, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 02/21/2014 12:23:05 PM:
Yeah, we are overloading the term 'developer' here, since that section
contains both information that is only useful to developers working on
Heat itself, and information useful to
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote:
On 22/02/14 06:42, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 02/21/2014
12:23:05 PM:
Yeah, we are overloading the term 'developer' here, since that section
contains both
On 22/02/14 03:37, Stan Lagun wrote:
Hi Everyone,
While looking through Heat templates generation code in Murano I've
realized it has a major design flaw: there is no isolation between
Heat resources generated by different apps.
Every app manifest can access and modify its environment stack
XenServer reported failure on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/73704.
The pointer to the logs should look like a jenkins failure but does not
in two ways. First, there is no console log, with a directory of other
log files next to it. Second, the .gz log files are not set up to be
downloaded
On 24/02/14 08:44, Anne Gentle wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
mailto:sba...@redhat.com wrote:
On 22/02/14 06:42, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com mailto:zbit...@redhat.com
wrote on 02/21/2014 12:23:05 PM:
Yeah,
Hi David,
That's a very strange error - it basically means the node has been used for
running a test already (both the first error in run_tests.log about the git
repository also existing, and the more fatal error about vif 3 existing)
I believe this was my fault - I should have purged all
On 22 February 2014 05:36, Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com wrote:
the ci cloud seems to be running today as expected, but we have a bit to
tuning todo
check-tripleo-overcloud-precise is throwing out false negatives because
the testenv-worker has a timeout that is less then the timeout on the
On 02/23/2014 09:14 PM, Steve Baker wrote:
On 24/02/14 08:44, Anne Gentle wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
mailto:sba...@redhat.com wrote:
On 22/02/14 06:42, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com mailto:zbit...@redhat.com
On 02/23/2014 01:14 PM, Steve Baker wrote:
On 24/02/14 08:44, Anne Gentle wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
mailto:sba...@redhat.com wrote:
On 22/02/14 06:42, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com mailto:zbit...@redhat.com
On 02/23/2014 03:29 PM, Bob Ball wrote:
Hi David,
That's a very strange error - it basically means the node has been used for
running a test already (both the first error in run_tests.log about the git
repository also existing, and the more fatal error about vif 3 existing)
I believe this
I believe I've identified the bug - it seems to have occurred when restarting
the Citrix CI system while the tests were in the process of being run, leading
it to believe that they had not been invoked yet and therefore triggering the
tests on that node a second time.
I've implemented a fix -
Agreed on both counts - I'd already updated the message to say that as well as
supporting the standard recheck you can run citrix recheck to only trigger
a recheck of XenServer and will try and fix the http headers tomorrow.
Bob
From: David Kranz
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote:
On 24/02/14 08:44, Anne Gentle wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote:
On 22/02/14 06:42, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com zbit...@redhat.com wrote on
On 21/02/14 11:03 +0100, Victor Stinner wrote:
Le vendredi 21 février 2014, 09:27:49 Angus Salkeld a écrit :
Honestly, I have no answer to your question right now (How useful is
trollius ...).
(...)
I asked your question on Tulip mailing list to see how a single code base
could support Tulip
One Convergence CI did report the third party tests as failed, but is
configured not to vote. Should we turn on the voting?
Thanks,
-hemanth
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
Aaron,
I was thinking the same thing recently with this patch [1]. Patch
I would like the Murano project to evaluate the upcoming heat
software-config resources to represent app configuration.
Yes, we are closely watching progress being made in Heat in that area and
evaluating how all new great features can be used in Murano
Inferring from the above, it sounds
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 12:41:15 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 09:14 +0800, Jay Lau wrote:
So there is no need to implement libvirt driver for the
host_maintenance_mode API as host_maintenance_mode is mainly for
VMWare and XenServer, also we can use evacuate and
Hi all,
Recently, I met one scenario which needs to close the cache on linux
hypervisor.
But some codes written in libvirt/driver.py (including suspend/snapshot)
are hard-coded.
For example:
---
def suspend(self, instance):
Suspend the specified instance.
dom =
Sure, hard-coding seems weird…
However, a global configuration here dominates all domains. It might be a
little too strong in cases in which we want to apply various configurations to
different domains.
Could we add any new attributes in the info for creating a domain for this? Or
any other
Thanks Aaron, it is really interesting.
The Hyper-V CI is non-voting (as required for new third-party CIs) and this
is the reason why any post from it will show “build succeeded”. As published
in other threads, AFAIK the only way to get rid
of this issue is to have the CI as voting.
Hi, Boris and all other guys:
I have found a BP about USB device passthrough in
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/host-usb-passthrough.
I have also read the latest nova code and make sure it doesn't support USB
passthrough by now.
Are there any progress or plan for USB passthrough?
Hi Alessandro,
Thank you for your description. You are right. I'm now using Nova-2013.1.3 on
Ubuntu 12.04 and going to upgrade to 2013.1.4 soon.
Best regards,
Akira
On 2014年2月23日 6:38:24 GMT+09:00, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
Please check also this bug fixed in
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote:
Google hangout has a limit of 10 people, but that might be fine with the
participation. If someone has a better suggestion
for video/voice chat (we don't really need video), that works with
windows/linux/mac, suggest it on
Team,
Due to the planned absence of the chair, and several key contributors, I have
cancelled our Tuesday team meeting for this week. Our normal schedule will
resume next week on 2014-03-04. I apologize for the short notice.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Solum
Regards,
Adrian
I promised Jesse after the openstack-sdk meeting that I would do a write
up of the direction of keystoneclient's auth plugins and Sessions. Have
a look here:
http://www.jamielennox.net/blog/2014/02/24/client-session-objects/
I know that this is different to the way Dean was looking at using
Hi,
There has recently been some speculation around the V3 API and whether
we should go forward with it or instead backport many of the changes
to the V2 API. I believe that the core of the concern is the extra
maintenance and test burden that supporting two APIs means and the
length of time
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 17:20 +1030, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
- Proposed way forward:
- Release the V3 API in Juno with nova-network and tasks support
- Feature freeze the V2 API when the V3 API is released
- Set the timeline for deprecation of V2 so users have a lot
of warning
Hi All,
I wanted to upload a new Win 2k8 R2 VMDK file to glance.
I have created a new windows VM with 20 GB hdd on ESXi 5.1 and then
uploaded the flat file to Glance. But when ever VM boots from openstack, it
goes to recovery mode.
Any help or point to correct solution document will be of great
Hi,
I want to know the admin_state_up attribute about networks but I
have not found any describes.
Can you help me to understand it? Thank you very much.
Regard,
Lee Li
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
33 matches
Mail list logo
