Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

On 03/18/2014 09:02 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18 2014, Sean Dague wrote: > >> There is a fundamental problem here that the Ceilometer team requires a >> version of Mongo that's not provided by the distro. We've taken a pretty >> hard line on not requiring newer versions of non python

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] question about e41fb84 "fix anti-affinity race condition on boot"

On 03/17/2014 01:54 PM, John Garbutt wrote: > On 15 March 2014 18:39, Chris Friesen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm curious why the specified git commit chose to fix the anti-affinity race >> condition by aborting the boot and triggering a reschedule. >> >> It seems to me that it would have been more eleg

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum][Oslo] Next Release of oslo.messaging?

In addition to the installation requirements, we also need to deal with the code-level changes. For example, when using the eventlet executor eventlet needs to have been imported very early by the application so it can monkeypatch the I/O libraries. When not using the eventlet executor, that monkey

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

On Tue, Mar 18 2014, Sean Dague wrote: > There is a fundamental problem here that the Ceilometer team requires a > version of Mongo that's not provided by the distro. We've taken a pretty > hard line on not requiring newer versions of non python stuff than the > distros we support actually have.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] OPENSTACK SERVICE ERROR

Couple of questions, - Do you have n-cpu running in every node? (controller and both computes) - Which services do you have enabled in both compute nodes? - To which node corresponds the screen log provided? - What is the output of nova-manage service list?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum][Oslo] Next Release of oslo.messaging?

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Angus Salkeld wrote: > On 18/03/14 07:39 +0530, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Adrian Otto >> wrote: >> >>> Doug Hellmann and Victror Stinner (+ oslo cores), >>> >>> Solum currently depends on a py33 gate. We want to use

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

On 03/18/2014 08:09 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'd like to discuss Ceilometer's tempest situation with you. > Now we have several patch sets on review that test core functionality of > Ceilometer: notificaton and pollstering (topic > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+pro

Re: [openstack-dev] Icehouse dependency freeze

On 03/18/2014 06:12 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Thomas Goirand wrote: >> We're now 1 month away from the scheduled release date. It is my strong >> opinion (as the main Debian OpenStack package maintainer) that for the >> last Havana release, the freeze of dependency happened really too late, >> cr

Re: [openstack-dev] MuranoPL questions?

+1 Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc. On 18 Mar 2014, at 19:01, Ruslan Kamaldinov wrote: > Joshua, Clint, > > The only platform I'm aware about which fully supports true isolation and > which > has been used in production for this purpose is Java VM. I know people who > developed systems for onli

Re: [openstack-dev] Icehouse dependency freeze

On 03/18/2014 02:51 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 03/18/2014 07:14 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We're now 1 month away from the scheduled release date. It is my strong >> opinion (as the main Debian OpenStack package maintainer) that for the >> last Havana release, the freeze of dependen

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

Hi folks, I'd like to discuss Ceilometer's tempest situation with you. Now we have several patch sets on review that test core functionality of Ceilometer: notificaton and pollstering (topic https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/tempest+branch:master+topic:bp/add-basic-cei

Re: [openstack-dev] MuranoPL questions?

Joshua, Clint, The only platform I'm aware about which fully supports true isolation and which has been used in production for this purpose is Java VM. I know people who developed systems for online programming competitions and really smart kids tried to break it without any luck :) Since we're s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Proposed Core Reviewer Changes

+ 1 From: Adrian Otto [adrian.o...@rackspace.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 12:13 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Proposed Core Reviewer Changes Solum Cores, I propose the following c

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat]Heat use as a standalone component for Cloud Managment over multi IAAS

Sorry for the late of this response, I'm currently working on a project called Warm. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Warm It is used as a standalone client and try to deploy small OpenStack environments from Yzml templates. You can find some samples here: https://github.com/sahid/warm-tem

[openstack-dev] Updating libvirt in gate jobs

Hi Team, We have 2 choices 1) Upgrade to libvirt 0.9.8+ (See [1] for details) 2) Enable UCA and upgrade to libvirt 1.2.2+ (see [2] for details) For #1, we received a patched deb from @SergeHallyn/@JamesPage and ran tests on it in review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79816/ For #2, @SergeHally

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Globally-unique VM MAC address to do vendor-backed DHCP

Hi stakers, We’re trying to replace dnsmasq-supplied DHCP for tenant VMs with a vendor’s baremetal DHCP server. In order to pass DHCP request to a vendor’s server and send DHCP response back to VM we decided to add another OVS bridge (we called it br-dhcp), connected to integration bridge (br-i

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] API schema location

On Tue, 18 Marc 2014 12:00:00 +0100 Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com] wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:39:19 +0100 > "Koderer, Marc" wrote: > > > > I just recognized that we have very similar interface definitions in > > tempest/api_schema and etc/schema: > > > > https://github.com/openst

Re: [openstack-dev] Icehouse dependency freeze

On 03/18/2014 06:12 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Thomas Goirand wrote: >> We're now 1 month away from the scheduled release date. It is my strong >> opinion (as the main Debian OpenStack package maintainer) that for the >> last Havana release, the freeze of dependency happened really too late, >> cr

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] API schema location

On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:39:19 +0100 "Koderer, Marc" wrote: > > I just recognized that we have very similar interface definitions in > tempest/api_schema and etc/schema: > > https://github.com/openstack/tempest/tree/master/etc/schemas > https://github.com/openstack/tempest/tree/master/tempest/api_

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][OVS Agent]

Hi nader, The easiest way would be to register a new RPC callback in the current ovs agent. This is what we have done for the l2-pop MD, with fdb_add and fdb_remove callbacks. However, it could become a mess if every MD adds it own callback directly into the code of the agent. L2 agent should be a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] question about e41fb84 "fix anti-affinity race condition on boot"

Hi Chris, 2014-03-18 0:36 GMT+01:00 Chris Friesen : > On 03/17/2014 05:01 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > > >> There are 2 distinct cases : >> 1. there are multiple schedulers involved in the decision >> 2. there is one single scheduler but there is a race condition on it >> > > > About 1., I agree

Re: [openstack-dev] Icehouse dependency freeze

Thomas Goirand wrote: > We're now 1 month away from the scheduled release date. It is my strong > opinion (as the main Debian OpenStack package maintainer) that for the > last Havana release, the freeze of dependency happened really too late, > creating issues hard to deal with on the packaging sid

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] python-saharaclient 0.6.0 release [savanna]

python-saharaclient addition change request is under review - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/81083/ On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: > Hi folks, > > the first version ofpython-saharaclient has been released. > > The main change is renaming all stuff from savanna to sahara

[openstack-dev] [sahara] python-saharaclient 0.6.0 release [savanna]

Hi folks, the first version ofpython-saharaclient has been released. The main change is renaming all stuff from savanna to sahara. This release contains backward compatibility for using it as savanna client. https://launchpad.net/python-saharaclient/0.6.x/0.6.0 https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pytho

[openstack-dev] [qa] API schema location

Hi Chris, hi all, I just recognized that we have very similar interface definitions in tempest/api_schema and etc/schema: https://github.com/openstack/tempest/tree/master/etc/schemas https://github.com/openstack/tempest/tree/master/tempest/api_schema Any objections if I move them to a single loc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about Raw Device Mapping

> From: Huang Zhiteng [mailto:winsto...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 4:40 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about Raw Device > Mapping > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Zhangleiqiang (Trump)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] advanced servicevm framework IRC meeting March 18(Tuesday) 23:00 UTC

Hi Balaji. Let's discuss/determine on the time at the meeting as it is listed as agenda. Sorry for inconvenience for the first time. Do you have any feedback other than the meeting time? thanks, On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 06:18:01AM +, "balaj...@freescale.com" wrote: > Hi Isaku Yamahata, > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Constructive Conversations

100% support that. Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc. On 18 Mar 2014, at 02:00, Adrian Otto wrote: > Kurt, > > I think that a set of community values for OpenStack would be a terrific > asset. I refer to values constantly as a way to align my efforts with the > needs of my company. I'd love to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about Raw Device Mapping

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) wrote: >> From: Huang Zhiteng [mailto:winsto...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 10:32 AM >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about Raw Device >

Re: [openstack-dev] Automatic version creation in PBR

Robert Collins wrote: > If you set 'version' in setup.cfg, pbr's behaviour will not change at all. > > If you do not set 'version' in setup.cfg then: > - for tagged commits, pbr's behaviour will not change at all. > - for untagged commits, pbr will change from > '$last_tag_version.$commit_count.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][rootwrap] Performance considerations, sudo?

Joe Gordon wrote: >> And this is a test with shedskin, I suppose that in more complicated >> dependecy scenarios it should perform better. >> >> [majopela@redcylon tmp]$ cat > > import sys >> > print "hello world" >> > sys.exit(0) >> > EOF >> >> [majopela

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][rootwrap] Performance considerations, sudo?

Hi Joe, thank you very much for the positive feedback, I plan to spend a day during this week on the shedskin-compatibility for rootwrap (I'll branch it, and tune/cut down as necessary) to make it compile under shedskin [1] : nothing done yet. It's a short-term alternative until we can hav

Re: [openstack-dev] [heatclient] Jenkins Fail (gate-python-heatclient-pypy FAILURE)

I believe this is the issue being tracked in https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1290562 The latest update to that issue has a suggested workaround. On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 6:32 PM, 黎林果 wrote: > Hi, > >Anybody know the "Jenkins Fail"? I've encountered this fail in tow > patches.

Re: [openstack-dev] MuranoPL questions?

>Who is going to train people on muranoPL, write language books and tutorials when the same amount of work has already been done for 10+ years for other languages In any language most of the time is spent not on learning of language constructs, but raise learning base classes/functions provided

[openstack-dev] [heatclient] Jenkins Fail (gate-python-heatclient-pypy FAILURE)

Hi, Anybody know the "Jenkins Fail"? I've encountered this fail in tow patches. gate-python-heatclient-pypy FAILURE in 1m 28s error: option --single-version-externally-managed not recognized ERROR: could n

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][baremetal] Status of nova baremetal and ironic

Hi, If I were to implement a new BM driver then should I propose a BP to Ironic rather than Nova? We are currently writing a driver internally using nova-baremetal. My understanding is that nova-baremetal will only merge critical bug fixes and new features will merge to Ironic, correct? Thanks.

<    1   2