On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 18:30 +, Tim Bell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 April 2014 20:05
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] deliver the vm-level HA to improve the
business continuity with
Hello Andrew,
here is the problem:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78406/5/nailgun/nailgun/test/base.py line
268.
If you remove this this line then in
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78406/5/nailgun/nailgun/network/manager.py`if`
block from line 131 will be run, especially db.commit() which
confirmed
On 04/14/2014 04:41 PM, Mark McClain wrote:
All-
I'd like to announce my candidacy to continue serving on the Technical
Committee.
Platform
---
OpenStack is one community comprised of many parts and we must view ourselves
as one unit. As a TC member, I will
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 13:29 +, Paul Michali (pcm) wrote:
See inline @PCM…
On Apr 9, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Jamie Lennox jamielen...@redhat.com
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
I've been independently been looking at something similar. Some things of
interest:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/quiesced-image-snapshots-with-qemu-guest-agent
Particularly interesting to trove may be this example hook:
confirmed
On 04/14/2014 07:11 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
Hi everyone!
I would like to announce my candidacy for the Technical Committee election.
About Me
I’m Morgan Fainberg. I am a software engineer working for a startup focused
on deploying OpenStack in a private cloud
Can we describe exactly what references, direct transition, expression
evaluation are doing in #2.
Expression evaluation especially seems to be an odd one, what's wrong with
pythons expression evaluation? I can't quite see why that would/should exist in
taskflow.
I can see it being
Hi Carlos,
This is Kanzhe. We discussed your port-based SFC on the Neutron advanced
service IRC.
I would like to reach out to you to discuss a bit more.
As you know, Neutron port is a logic abstraction for network interfaces
with a MAC and IP address. However, network services could be used at
Hi all,
I'd like to announce my candidacy as a TC member.
A little about me:
I am a software developer at Rackspace (previously at Red Hat). I started off
my OpenStack
contributions with Heat (I started Heat with Steve Dake). I have also
have make some significant contirbutions to Ceilometer
Hello y'all!
Over the last few months, I feel like we've seen a renewed vigor for
participation in making the LBaaS project successful. After the (still
unresolved) object model discussion started in January, based on feedback
we were getting from Neutron core developers (mainly Mark McClain,
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2014-04-14 15:41:23 -0700:
Right now the os-*-config projects default to looking for their files in
/opt/stack, with an override env var provided for other locations. For
packaging purposes it would be nice if they defaulted to a more
FHS-compliant
Is anybody uses live_migration_bandwidth option?
I think the option doesn't work at all
We have tested live migration functions while changing the configuration.
However, we got same results.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Feel free to update the agenda with items for discussion
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-IPv6-Subteam#Agenda_for_April_15th
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hello all,
Marconi team will have its weekly meeting tomorrow at 1500 UTC in
#openstack-meeting-alt.
The meeting agenda is available at
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Marconi#Next_meeting
All are welcome to add agenda items for the meeting.
If you are interested in learning about the
What hypervisor are you using?
Ricky
From: 한승진 [mailto:yongi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 9:34 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-Dev][Live Migration]Live migration
bandwidth Configuration of Nova
Is anybody uses
They are all parts of conditional transitions: every task should have a number
of possible transitions; each transition consist of a reference to the task we
want to transit to and the condition that should evaluate to true for
transition to start.
At that point, I'd say that it perfectly
Im using KVM
2014. 4. 15. 오후 12:24에 Bohai (ricky) bo...@huawei.com님이 작성:
What hypervisor are you using?
Ricky
*From:* 한승진 [mailto:yongi...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 15, 2014 9:34 AM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List
*Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Openstack-Dev][Live
thanks for the quick reply :)
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14 2014, ZhiQiang Fan wrote:
Hi, developers,
For fixing bug https://launchpad.net/bugs/1304886, I uploaded a patch
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86501/, when review
Thank for pointing that out, Joshua.
I had a look on [1] and it seems to me that it might actually do the trick to
some degree, though I'm afraid this is still not what we are looking for. While
Mistral is asynchronous and event-driven, this particular design is not and
would still force us to
Thanks, that helps explain those.
Let's see where the conditional evaluation logic goes. Likely it won't be
python conditions directly.
I think though we should be able to work with other condition logic. I started
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/87417/ today, hopefully can flush it out more
Sure, its not the fully complete lazy_engine, but piece by piece we can get
there.
Of course code/contributions are welcome, as such things will benefit more than
just mistral, but openstack as a whole :-)
-Josh
From: Kirill Izotov enyk...@stackstorm.commailto:enyk...@stackstorm.com
Date:
101 - 121 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
