Hello Mitsuhiro,
I'm sorry, but I remain unconvinced. Is there a customer demand for this
feature?
If you'd like, feel free to add this topic to a Cinder weekly meeting
agenda, and join the meeting so that we can have an interactive discussion.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderMeetings
- Original Message -
Hi folks
I believed we should link bug or bp for any commit except automated
commit by infra.
I think that stuff like refactors should be exempt, if for the simple
truth that often there's no bug involved.
However, I found also there is no written policy for
Hi,
I created a small userscript that allows you to hide CI comments in Gerrit.
That way you can read only comments written by humans and hide everything else.
I’ve been struggling for a long time to follow discussions on changes with many
patch sets because of the CI noise. So I came up with
On 05/24/2014 01:36 PM, Armando M. wrote:
I appreciate that there is a cost involved in relying on distributed
communication, but this must be negligible considered what needs to
happen end-to-end. If the overhead being referred here is the price to
pay for having a more dependable system (e.g.
On 23 May 2014 04:57, Gregory Haynes g...@greghaynes.net wrote:
Eventually we may need to scale traffic beyond one HAProxy, at which
point we'll need to bring something altogether more sophisticated in -
lets design that when we need it.
Sooner than that we're likely going to need to scale
Great, thanks for working on it. I'll test it out asap.
Cheers,
Kieran
On 23 May 2014 23:18, Brant Knudson b...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Kieran Spear kisp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I notice that the templated catalog doesn't support the V3 API*. This
is a blocker
I just filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1323152 - TripleO
changes are failing on check-tempest-dsvm-virtual-ironic which has
just been made voting (and I support that) - but we need to get this
fixed asap or make it nonvoting again. I haven't dug deep enough to
know if its rooted in
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 04:13:57PM +0900,
Ogaki, Kenichi k.og...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Hi.
I’m newbie to Openstack, so I want to clarify how OpenStack can implement
ETSI NFV Architecture.
The concept of Advanced service looks like Network Service in ETSI NFV
Architecture as shown in
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:40:02AM +0300,
Dmitry mey...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Isaku,
Thank you for the updated link. I'n not sure where from I get the previous
one, probably from the direct Google search.
If we're talking about NFV Mano, it's very important to keep NFVO and VNFM
as a separate
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-05-25 23:12:26 +:
On 23 May 2014 04:57, Gregory Haynes g...@greghaynes.net wrote:
Eventually we may need to scale traffic beyond one HAProxy, at which
point we'll need to bring something altogether more sophisticated in -
lets design that
10 matches
Mail list logo
