Excerpts from 严超's message of 2014-06-03 21:23:25 -0700:
Hi, All :
I've deployed my ironic following this link:
http://ma.ttwagner.com/bare-metal-deploys-with-devstack-and-ironic/ , all
steps is completed.
Now one of my node-show provision_state is active. But why is this
Hi stackers,
When I use the createBackup API, I found it just snapshots the root disk of the
instance.
For an instance with multiple cinder backend volumes, it will not snapshot them.
It's a little different to the things in current createImage API.
My question is whether it's reasonable and
Hi all, Now heat only supports suspending/resuming a whole stack, all the
resources of the stack will be suspended/resumed,but sometime we just want to
suspend or resume only a part of resources in the stack, so I think adding
resource-action API for heat isnecessary. this API will be
Hello,
For today I have prepared a spec for events feature in HBase
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96417/,
and it was successfully merged. In spec was described the details of event
features in HBase.
Yours,
Igor D.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Dmitriy Ukhlov dukh...@mirantis.com
wrote:
+1, if doing so, a related bug related bug may be solved as well:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1323538
On Jun 3, 2014, at 21:29, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stackers,
tl;dr
=
Move CPU and RAM allocation ratio definition out of the Nova scheduler and
into the
Hi, Xurong,
How do you test it in postgresql? Do you use tox to do a unittest and get the
result(1h)?
/Yalei
From: Xurong Yang [mailto:ido...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 6:01 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] One
Excerpts from yang zhang's message of 2014-06-04 00:01:41 -0700:
Hi all, Now heat only supports suspending/resuming a whole stack, all the
resources of the stack will be suspended/resumed,but sometime we just want to
suspend or resume only a part of resources in the stack, so I
Unit tests use sqlite db backend, so it might be much faster than
production environment where DB is on different server.
Eugene.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Wang, Yalei yalei.w...@intel.com wrote:
Hi, Xurong,
How do you test it in postgresql? Do you use tox to do a unittest and get
From: cl...@fewbar.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 00:09:39 -0700
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Spam] [heat] Resource action API
Excerpts from yang zhang's message of 2014-06-04 00:01:41 -0700:
Hi all, Now heat only supports
Excerpts from yang zhang's message of 2014-06-04 01:14:37 -0700:
From: cl...@fewbar.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 00:09:39 -0700
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Spam] [heat] Resource action API
Excerpts from yang zhang's message of 2014-06-04
+1, makes sense to me.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Yingjun Li liyingjun1...@gmail.com wrote:
+1, if doing so, a related bug related bug may be solved as well:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1323538
On Jun 3, 2014, at 21:29, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stackers,
On 3 June 2014 14:29, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
tl;dr
=
Move CPU and RAM allocation ratio definition out of the Nova scheduler and
into the resource tracker. Remove the calculations for overcommit out of the
core_filter and ram_filter scheduler pieces.
+1
I hope to see us
+1 for this proposal.
We are highly interested in this one.
Jaesuk Ahn, Ph.D.
Team Lead, Next Generation Cloud Platform Dev. Project
KT
… active member of openstack community
On Jun 4, 2014, 5:29:36 PM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
On 3 June 2014 14:29, Jay
HI All,
Could someone please, review the bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1301359
Made Size parameter optional while creating DB Instance.
While creating Database Instance size parameter depends on
whether trove_volume_support is set. So size paramater is
set to mandatory if
On 02/06/14 07:52 -0700, Keith Newstadt wrote:
Thanks for the responses Flavio, Roland.
Some background on why I'm asking: we're using Kafka as the message queue for
a stream processing service we're building, which we're delivering to our
internal customers as a service along with
Does there is any blueprint related to this? Thanks.
2014-06-03 21:29 GMT+08:00 Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com:
Hi Stackers,
tl;dr
=
Move CPU and RAM allocation ratio definition out of the Nova scheduler and
into the resource tracker. Remove the calculations for overcommit out of
the
Thanks for traceback. I reported a bug on launchpad[1] based on your logs.
Below you can find several possible solutions at the moment:
1) Wait for bug-fix
2) Create neutron subnet manually(some tutorials: [2], [3])
3) Copy existing Tempest configuration file into Rally(Rally stores Tempest
+2 to Stan: there is a strong need for v2 API which would satisfy the needs
of Murano 0.5+. The current one is definitely outdated.
I'd like to point that there are at least two major flaws in the v1 design:
1. Sessions. Actually, they violate one of the core principles of RESTful
design - the
Hi Jay,
This sounds good to me. You left out the part of limits from the discussion –
these filters set the limits used at the resource tracker. You also left out
the force-to-host and its effect on limits. Yes, I would agree with doing this
at the resource tracker too.
And of course the
Hi, All:
I searched a lot about how ironic automatically install image on
bare metal. But there seems to be no clear workflow out there.
What I know is, in traditional PXE, a bare metal pull image from
PXE server using tftp. In tftp root, there is a ks.conf which tells tftp
which
On 05/31/2014 11:13 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-05-29 20:55:01 + (+), Lyle, David wrote:
[...]
There are several more xstatic packages that horizon will pull in that are
maintained outside openstack. The packages added are only those that did
not have existing xstatic packages.
Hi!
Workflow is not entirely documented by now AFAIK. After PXE boots deploy
kernel and ramdisk, it exposes hard drive via iSCSI and notifies Ironic.
After that Ironic partitions the disk, copies an image and reboots node
with final kernel and ramdisk.
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 19:20 +0800, 严超
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
I have posted this series and it has evoked a surprising (to me) amount
of discussion so I wanted to clarify some things and talk to some of the
issues so we can move forward.
So first note is this is an early posting and still is not tested
Hi,
Thank you very much for your reply !
But there are still some questions for me. Now I've come to the step where
ironic partitions the disk as you replied.
Then, how does ironic copies an image ? I know the image comes from glance.
But how to know image is really available when reboot?
And,
Hello,
I'd like to start a discussion about the use of mocking libraries in
Horizon's tests, in particular, mox and mock.
As you may know, Mox is the library that has been used so far, and we
have a lot of tests written using it. It is based on a similar Java
library and does very strict
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 04:13:33PM +0530, Harshada Kakad wrote:
HI Matthias Runge,
Which feature in trove are you talking about?
And even which capabilities are missing which will make the patch fail?
I believe the patch has nothing to do with
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83503/
If
On 06/04/2014 02:41 PM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to start a discussion about the use of mocking libraries in
Horizon's tests, in particular, mox and mock.
As you may know, Mox is the library that has been used so far, and we
have a lot of tests written using it. It is
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 20:29 +0800, 严超 wrote:
Hi,
Thank you very much for your reply !
But there are still some questions for me. Now I've come to the step
where ironic partitions the disk as you replied.
Then, how does ironic copies an image ? I know the image comes from
glance. But
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 21:18 +0800, 严超 wrote:
Thank you !
I noticed the two sets of k+r in tftp configuration of ironic.
Should the two sets be the same k+r ?
Deploy images are created for you by DevStack/whatever. If you do it by
hand, you may use diskimage-builder. Currently they are
Thank you !
I noticed the two sets of k+r in tftp configuration of ironic.
Should the two sets be the same k+r ?
The first set is defined in the ironic node definition.
How do we define the second set correctly ?
*Best Regards！*
*Chao Yan--**My twitter：Andy Yan @yanchao727
On 06/04/2014 02:56 PM, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
+1 for adding Mock to the requirements (test-requirements.txt rather
than requirements.txt, right?) and using it in newly written tests.
+1 for the usage of mock.
Also the use of mox3 should be preferred. mox is not compatible with
Python3 and it's
Hi Everyone,
Just a quick reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
this Thursday, June 5th at 17:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel.
The agenda for tomorrow's meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting
Anyone is welcome to add an
Hi all,
Just a heads-up - apparently this clashed with the docs meeting, as a result
the NFV meeting will occur in #openstack-meeting-alt.
Apologies for any convenience,
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
Yes, but when you assign a production image to an ironic bare metal node.
You should provide *ramdisk_id and kernel_id. *
Should the *ramdisk_id and kernel_id* be the same as deploy images (aka the
first set of k+r) ?
You didn't answer me if the two sets of r + k should be the same ?
*Best
Hi everyone,
Concerning the bug described at [1], where n different machines may have
the same hostname and then n different DNS entries with that hostname
are written; some points have to be discussed with the nova community.
On the bug review [2], Andrew Laski pointed out that we should
On 06/04/2014 02:56 AM, Bohai (ricky) wrote:
Hi stackers,
When I use the createBackup API, I found it just snapshots the root disk of the
instance.
For an instance with multiple cinder backend volumes, it will not snapshot them.
It's a little different to the things in current createImage
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 21:51 +0800, 严超 wrote:
Yes, but when you assign a production image to an ironic bare metal
node. You should provide ramdisk_id and kernel_id.
What do you mean by assign here? Could you quote some documentation?
Instance image is assigned using --image argument to `nova
On 04/06/14 17:21 +0800, 严超 wrote:
Hi, All:
When I tried to deploy a bare metal using ironic and following
http://ma.ttwagner.com/bare-metal-deploys-with-devstack-and-ironic/, I face
the one issue:
It looks like this message came through several times, and that
someone helped you in
I'm adding the ceilometer tag so the Ceilometer guys can participate as well.
Cheers,
H
From: Martinez, Christian [mailto:christian.marti...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 5:21 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] [UX]
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:51 AM, 严超 yanchao...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but when you assign a production image to an ironic bare metal node.
You should provide ramdisk_id and kernel_id.
Should the ramdisk_id and kernel_id be the same as deploy images (aka the
first set of k+r) ?
You didn't answer
Hi Flavio, In your discussions around a developing Kafka plugin for
Marconi would that be potentially be done by adding a Kafka transport to
oslo.messaging? That is something that I'm very interested in for the
monitoring as a service project I'm working on.
Thanks --Roland
On 6/4/14, 3:06 AM,
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 2:51 PM, 严超 yanchao...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but when you assign a production image to an ironic bare metal node.
You should provide ramdisk_id and kernel_id.
Should the ramdisk_id and kernel_id be the same as deploy images (aka the
first set of k+r) ?
You didn't answer
Thanks guys, you¹ve answered everything I needed to know!
I¹ll look to see what help I can provide to the KMIP efforts.
-Rob
On 04/06/2014 15:18, Becker, Bill bill.bec...@safenet-inc.com wrote:
Regarding:
Also, is the ³OpenStack KMIP Client² ever going to be a thing?
Hi All,
I want to upload my customised rootfs and kernel image for powerpc to the
openstack database.
For this I followed the following document:
http://docs.openstack.org/grizzly/openstack-compute/admin/content/creating-custom-images.html#d6e6473
I followed the following steps as described in
Hey Carl,
Thanks for the quick response.
I'm missing something because the version in your review is quite different the
version I see when I clone devstack on my test machine, or when I browse
https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/blob/master/samples/local.conf. I'm
not referring to
The patch [2] proposes changing the default DNS driver from
'nova.network.noop_dns_driver.NoopDNSDriver' to other that verifies if
DNS entries already exists before adding them, such as the
'nova.network.minidns.MiniDNS'.
Changing a default setting in a way that isn't backwards compatible
I will provide a little more context for the TC audience. I asked Hemanth
to tag this message [TC] because at the Juno summit in the cross-project
track there was discussion of cross-project api consistency [1]. The main
outcome of that meeting was that TC should recommend API conventions via
John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote on 06/04/2014 04:29:36 AM:
On 3 June 2014 14:29, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
tl;dr
=
Move CPU and RAM allocation ratio definition out of the Nova scheduler
and
into the resource tracker. Remove the calculations for overcommit out
of
Comments inline ...
Hi Liz,
The designs look really cool and I think that we should consider a couple of
things (more related to the alarm’s implementation made at Ceilometer):
· There are combined alarms, which are a combination of two or more alarms.
We need to see how they work and
Not only live upgrades but also dynamic reconfiguration.
Overcommitting affects the quality of service delivered to the cloud user.
In this situation in particular, as in many situations in general, I think
we want to enable the service provider to offer multiple qualities of
service.
Hi Liz,
Two further thoughts occurred to me after hitting send on
my previous mail.
First, is the concept of alarm dimensioning; see my RDO Ceilometer
getting started guide[1] for an explanation of that notion.
A key associated concept is the notion of dimensioning which defines the set
of
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Brandon Logan
brandon.lo...@rackspace.com wrote:
This is an LBaaS topic bud I'd like to get some Neutron Core members to
give their opinions on this matter so I've just directed this to Neutron
proper.
The design for the new API and object model for LBaaS needs
Today we continued our 'bug scrub' meeting and discussed all issues, which
were assigned to 'juno-1' mailstone and also all 'new' issues.
The meeting minutes are available by the following links:
Minutes:
Angus/Julien,
I would disagree that we should expose the mistral DSL to end users.
What if we decide to use something other than Mistral in the future? We should
be able to plug in any workflow system we want without changing what we expose
to the end user.
To me, the pipeline DSL is similar
Hi Angus, Julien,
No major disagreements.
My thinking is that we should provide more application developer focused
mechanism for customizing workflows (point #3). This may not necessarily be an
entirely new DSL.
It could just be additions to the current Plan structure. For example, we could
Thanks for your feedback Kyle. I will be at that meeting on Monday.
Thanks,
Brandon
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 11:54 -0500, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Brandon Logan
brandon.lo...@rackspace.com wrote:
This is an LBaaS topic bud I'd like to get some Neutron Core members to
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Thanks for the excellent feedback on these, guys! I’ll be working on making
updates over the next week and will send a fresh link out when done. Anyone
else with feedback, please feel free to fire away.
Best,
Liz
On Jun 4, 2014, at 12:33 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Liz,
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Overcommitting affects the quality of service delivered to the cloud user.
In this situation in particular, as in many situations in general, I think
we want to enable the service provider to offer multiple qualities
Murali,
I’d like to explore the possibility that Solum users don’t need to see a
pipeline DSL at all in the general case, and that only power users are
interacting with it. If that UX is possible, then what DSL is used is much less
important as long as it allows customizations to at least the
Agreeing with what Murali said below. We should make things really simple for
the 99 percentile of the users, and not force the complexity needed by the
minority of the advanced users on the rest of the 99 percentile users.
Mistral is a generic workflow DSL, we do not need to expose all that
On 06/03/2014 10:40 PM, ChangBo Guo wrote:
Jay, thanks for raising this up .
+1 for this .
A related question about the CPU and RAM allocation ratio, shall we
apply them when get hypervisor information with command nova
hypervisor-show ${hypervisor-name}
The output shows like
| memory_mb
On 06/04/2014 03:08 AM, Yingjun Li wrote:
+1, if doing so, a related bug related bug may be solved as well:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1323538
Yep, I agree that the above bug would be addressed.
Best,
-jay
On Jun 3, 2014, at 21:29, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
On 06/04/2014 12:19 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote on 06/04/2014 04:29:36 AM:
On 3 June 2014 14:29, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
tl;dr
=
Move CPU and RAM allocation ratio definition out of the Nova
scheduler and
into the resource
Murali, Roshan.
I think there is a misunderstood. By default, the user wouldn't see any
workflow dsl. If the user does not specify anything, we would use a
pre-defined mistral workbook defined by Solum, as Adrian described
If the user needs more, mistral is not so complicated. Have a look at
On 06/04/2014 06:10 AM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote:
Hi Jay,
This sounds good to me. You left out the part of limits from the
discussion – these filters set the limits used at the resource tracker.
Yes, and that is, IMO, bad design. Allocation ratios are the domain of
the compute node and
On 06/04/2014 11:56 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
Hi Jay,
* Host aggregates may also have a separate allocation ratio that
overrides any configuration setting that a particular host may
have
So with your proposal would the resource tracker be responsible for
picking and using override values defined
All,
Thanks for the interest in the NFV scheduling topic. Please find a proposal on
Smart Scheduler (Solver Scheduler) enhancements for NFV: Use Cases,
Constraints etc..
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k60BQXOMkZS0SIxpFOppGgYp416uXcJVkAFep3Oeju8/edit#heading=h.wlbclagujw8c
Based on this
- Original Message -
From: ChangBo Guo glongw...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 10:40:19 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal: Move CPU and memory allocation
ratio
On 04/06/14 03:01, yang zhang wrote:
Hi all,
Now heat only supports suspending/resuming a whole stack, all the
resources of the stack will be suspended/resumed,
but sometime we just want to suspend or resume only a part of resources
Any reason you wouldn't put that subset of resources into
Hi Stackers,
I'm looking to get consensus on a proposed API for server instance
tagging in Nova:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/91444/
In the proposal, the REST API for the proposed server instance tagging
looks like so:
Get list of tags for server:
GET
OK, so I'm cranking on All of the Kerberso stuff: plus S4U2Proxy work
etcexcept that I have never worked with DJango directly before. I
want to get a sanity check on my approach:
Instead of authenticating to Keystone, Horizon will use mod_auth_krb5
and REMOTE_USER to authenticate the
I've implemented Kerberos (via Apache) + Django once before, and yes, taking
this as pseudo-code you're on the right track. Obviously the devil is in the
details and you'll work out the particulars as you go.
The most important bit (obviously) is just making absolutely sure your
REMOTE_USER
The problem with exposing Mistral DSL the way it is, is that there are many
things the user should not be aware of.
Lets take the example Mistral DSL created here,
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95709/4/etc/solum/workbooks/build.yaml
Why should the end user know and define things like
Hi Timur,
Really appreciate your reply.
Will try your suggestions.
Thanks,
Nader.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hello, Nader!
As for `contributes` attribute, you could override `contribute(self,
data, context)` method in your descendant of
Hi Folks,
I've been working on a change to make the user_data field an optional part of
the Instance object since passing it around everywhere seems a bad idea since:
- It can be huge
- It's only used when getting metadata
- It can contain user sensitive data
-
Sorry to poke my head in, but doesn't that beg the question of why you'd want
to expose some third party DSL in the first place? If its an advanced feature,
I wonder why it would be even considered before the 90% solution works, much
less take a dependency on another non-integrated service.
Hi folks,
We'll be having the Sahara team meeting as usual in
#openstack-meeting-alt channel.
Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SaharaAgenda#Next_meetings
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Sahara+Meetingiso=20140605T18
--
Sincerely yours,
Sergey Lukjanov
On 06/04/2014 03:10 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
I've implemented Kerberos (via Apache) + Django once before, and yes,
taking this as pseudo-code you're on the right track. Obviously the
devil is in the details and you'll work out the particulars as you go.
The most important bit (obviously)
I suspect that to be true. Just adding a second authentication backend to the
django-openstack-auth package would be fine. At least some of the logic should
be reusable and creating a whole additional package seems like an unnecessary
separation.
- Gabriel
From: Adam Young
Good question Randall.
Either we implement some workflow, which is what we do now that is not
configurable, or we adopt another workflow system. We figured that using an
existing workflow system would be smarter than duplicating one by making Solum
any more configurable.
We have plans to
Hi Devs,
I have submitted an WIP review (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97900/)
for Heat parameters encryption blueprint
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/encrypt-hidden-parameters
This quick and dirty implementation encrypts all the parameters on on
Stack 'store' and decrypts on on
We'll meet tomorrow at the regular time in #openstack-meeting-3.
Juno-1 is just one week away. We will discuss the distributed
virtual router (DVR) work to see what the community can do to help the
DVR team land the hard work that they've been doing. I believe that we
also have some IPAM stuff
The backporting rules are now part of Fuel wiki:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/How_to_contribute#Backport_bugfixes_to_stable_release_series
There is also a new page on code review rules, please also review and
make use of it:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/Code_Review_Rules
On Mon,
Yes, memcached is a candidate that looks promising. First things first,
though. I think we need the abstraction of an ipam interface merged. That
will take some more discussion and work on its own.
Carl
On May 30, 2014 4:37 PM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com wrote:
I was thinking
Hi Brandon, hi Kyle!
I'm a bit confused about the deprecation (btw, thanks for sending this
Brandon!), as I (wrongly) assumed #1 would be the chosen path for the new API
implementation. I understand the proposal and #2 sounds actually cleaner.
Just out of curiosity, Kyle, where is LBaaS
Hi, Xu Han:
You mentioned in the weekly meeting that you guys saw some issues in the lab,
which may pertain to the dnsmasq source code I wrote. Would you please share
with me the symptom and the procedures to reproduce them? I would like to take
a look and fix the issue if necessary.
Thanks!
You are right. I did feel a bit bad about hijacking the thread. But,
most of discussion was related closely enough that I never decided to
fork in to a newer thread.
I think I'm done now. I'll have a look at your review and we'll put
IPAM to rest for now. :)
Carl
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 2:36
Hi Andres,
I've assumed (and we know how assumptions work) that the deprecation
would take place in Juno and after a cyle or two it would totally be
removed from the code. Even if #1 is the way to go, the old /vips
resource would be deprecated in favor of /loadbalancers and /listeners.
I agree
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Elizabeth K. Joseph
l...@princessleia.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting on Tuesday June 3rd, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting
Meeting minutes and log:
Minutes:
Hi all:
I was curious if people are having issues booking the room from the
block I have setup. I received word from the hotel that only one (1!)
person has booked yet. Given the mid-cycle is approaching in a month,
I wanted to make sure that people are making plans for travel. Are
people booking
I tried to book online and it seems that the pre-payment is non-refundable:
Hyatt.Com Rate Rate RulesFull prepayment required, non-refundable, no
date changes.
The price is $149 USD per night. Is that what you have blocked?
Edgar
On 6/4/14, 2:47 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com
I documented a starting point for What can be customized in the CI Pipeline.
Hopefully this helps in the design discussion
Take a look at the google docs below:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1a0yjxKWbwnY7g9NZtYALEZdm1g8Uf4fixDZLAgRBZCU/edit?pli=1#
From: Adrian Otto
All,
I'm researching a bunch of HSM applications and I'm struggling to find much
info. I was wondering about the progress of KMIP support in Barbican? Is this
waiting on an open python KMIP support?
Just for a bit more clarification, APL is supporting a KMIP implementation as a
I think it's even cheaper than that. Try calling the hotel to get the
better rate, I think Carl was able to successfully acquire the room at
the cheaper rate (something like $115 a night or so).
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Edgar Magana Perdomo (eperdomo)
eperd...@cisco.com wrote:
I tried to
Hello Stackers!
I'm using SPICE Consoles now but, there is no button to send Ctrl + Alt +
Del to a Windows Instance, so, it becomes very hard to log in into those
guests...
Can you guys enable it at Horizon?!
Tks!
Thiago
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-06-04 16:19:05 -0700:
On 04/06/14 15:58, Vijendar Komalla wrote:
Hi Devs,
I have submitted an WIP review (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97900/)
for Heat parameters encryption blueprint
On Jun 4, 2014, at 7:05 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-06-04 16:19:05 -0700:
On 04/06/14 15:58, Vijendar Komalla wrote:
Hi Devs,
I have submitted an WIP review (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97900/)
for Heat parameters encryption
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stackers,
I'm looking to get consensus on a proposed API for server instance tagging
in Nova:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/91444/
In the proposal, the REST API for the proposed server instance tagging
looks like
+1 to 404 for a DELETE if the tag does not exist.
There's a good discussion in this paragraph from RESTful Web APIs
book -
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
