Re: [openstack-dev] Nova CI Infrastructure

Hi, It looks like your patch ran with no problems. The only fail is a non voting test which means that it's not reliable. You should be good on the CI side, just need to wait to get reviews for your patch. Thanks Mohammed Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 16, 2015, at 1:05 AM, kwon-ho lee wrote:

[openstack-dev] Nova CI Infrastructure

Hello, OpenStack dev members, Is there any problem on "Nova CI Infrastructure"? Here is my submitted link. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156126/ I don't know why my patch does not execute all tests. Is it ok to review my patch?? Thanks Kwonho ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] is it possible to microversion a static class method?

So ultimately I think this is a style issue rather than a technical one. I think there are situations where one way looks clearer than another the other way does. Sorry I can't get around to putting up a couple of examples, ATM but to be clear there is no difference in the end result (no different

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][horizon][infra] oslo.policy in django-openstack-auth fails with stable/juno global requirement check

Thanks Doug, It is a good direction to have the stable branches for all libraries. It seems better that I wait for adopting oslo.policy in django-openstack-auth. In the current infra, a library specified in LIBS_FROM_GIT will be installed even if its version does not match global-requirement (for

[openstack-dev] [Horizon][DOA] Extending OpenStack Auth for new mechanisms (websso, kerberos, k2k etc)

Hi All, Please note when reading this that I have no real knowledge of django so it is very possible I'm overlooking something obvious. ### Issue Django OpenStack Auth (DOA) has always been tightly coupled to the notion of a username and password. As keystone progresses and new authentication m

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] is it possible to microversion a static class method?

2015-03-16 9:48 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu : > > > 2015-03-13 19:10 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague : > >> On 03/13/2015 02:55 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: >> > On 03/12/2015 12:13 PM, Sean Dague wrote: >> >> On 03/12/2015 02:03 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> I'm having an issue with microversions. >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] is it possible to microversion a static class method?

2015-03-13 19:10 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague : > On 03/13/2015 02:55 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: > > On 03/12/2015 12:13 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > >> On 03/12/2015 02:03 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I'm having an issue with microversions. > >>> > >>> The api_version() code has a comment sayi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] IPAM reference driver status and other stuff

Thanks for the update Carl! I spent some time trying to make the refactored base plugin class with the IPAM driver. I have been partially successful. The results are so far in [1] (it's a patch that applies on top of Pavel's topmost patch); this patch will be soon split into smaller patch which I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] proposing rameshg87 to ironic-core

Ramakrishnan, Congratulations! I owe you a lot :) Naohiro. From: Devananda van der Veen [mailto:devananda@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 1:06 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] proposing rameshg87 to ironic-core

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Generic question about synchronizing neutron agent on compute node with DB

Hi slawek, may be you're hitting this l2pop bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1372438 On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Sławek Kapłoński wrote: > Hello, > > Dnia niedziela, 15 marca 2015 17:45:05 Salvatore Orlando pisze: > > On 14 March 2015 at 11:19, Sławek Kapłoński wrote: > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Generic question about synchronizing neutron agent on compute node with DB

Hello, Dnia niedziela, 15 marca 2015 17:45:05 Salvatore Orlando pisze: > On 14 March 2015 at 11:19, Sławek Kapłoński wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm using ovs agents with L2 population mechanism in ML2 plugin. I noticed > > that sometimes agents don't receive proper RPC to add new vxlan tunnel > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance meeting time.

+1 for consistent time On 14/03/15 10:11, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > > Here's what it looks like so far:- > > > 1400UTC: 3 votes (all core reviewers) > > 1500UTC: 5 votes (one core reviewer) > > Both: 4 votes (all core reviewers) > > > Let's wait another couple days to see if more people respond. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Request to to revisit this patch

I agree with Walt that reverting this is the right answer. Please make sure to have your ci running as well for liberty. Jay On Mar 4, 2015 2:30 AM, "Zhangni" wrote: > Hi Mike, Jay, and Walter, > > > > Please revisit this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/151959/ and > don’t revert this,

Re: [openstack-dev] Deprecation warnings considered harmful?

+2. I think the having checks are helpful. If they aren't removed it does Leelee harm. Jay On Mar 15, 2015 6:39 AM, "Duncan Thomas" wrote: > On 13 March 2015 at 17:36, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > >> I wish we, as a community, were less obsessed with creating so many >> hacking rules. These are re

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Generic question about synchronizing neutron agent on compute node with DB

The L2 agent, for instance, has a logic to perform "full" synchronisations with the server. These happens in two cases: 1) upon agent restart, as some messages from the server side might have gone lost 2) whenever a failure is detected on the agent side (this is probably a bit too conservative). S

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Generic question about synchronizing neutron agent on compute node with DB

On 14 March 2015 at 11:19, Sławek Kapłoński wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using ovs agents with L2 population mechanism in ML2 plugin. I noticed > that sometimes agents don't receive proper RPC to add new vxlan tunnel > openflow rules and then vxlan network between some compute nodes not > working. > I

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][horizon][infra] oslo.policy in django-openstack-auth fails with stable/juno global requirement check

Excerpts from Akihiro Motoki's message of 2015-03-16 01:25:08 +0900: > Hi Oslo team, > > I am working on adopting the graduated oslo.policy in django-openstack-auth > [1] > but I have a question on how to migrate openstack.common.policy to oslo.policy > in libraries which have no stable branch. >

[openstack-dev] [oslo][horizon][infra] oslo.policy in django-openstack-auth fails with stable/juno global requirement check

Hi Oslo team, I am working on adopting the graduated oslo.policy in django-openstack-auth [1] but I have a question on how to migrate openstack.common.policy to oslo.policy in libraries which have no stable branch. django-openstack-auth has no stable branches as other python-*client. stable/juno

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] will instance action deprecate in feature

2015-03-11 15:57 GMT+08:00 Qiao, Liyong : > Hi all > will instance action deprecate in feature since we have notify mechanism now? > Currently, nova have instance action and instance event action to record > specify actions performed on a instances. > For some enterprise user, they may need to com

Re: [openstack-dev] Deprecation warnings considered harmful?

> On Mar 15, 2015, at 7:35 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > > On 13 March 2015 at 17:36, Doug Hellmann > wrote: > > I wish we, as a community, were less obsessed with creating so many > hacking rules. These are really minor changes and it's going to be a > relatively s

Re: [openstack-dev] Deprecation warnings considered harmful?

On 13 March 2015 at 17:36, Doug Hellmann wrote: > I wish we, as a community, were less obsessed with creating so many > hacking rules. These are really minor changes and it's going to be a > relatively short-lived issue that could just be fixed once. If there's a > regression, fixing *that* won'

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] how safe is it to change NoAuthMiddlewareBase?

On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 09:51:27 -0700 Jay Pipes wrote: > On 02/26/2015 04:27 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > > In trying to move the flavor manage negative tests out of Tempest > > and into the Nova functional tree, I ran into one set of tests > > which are permissions checking. Basically that a regular use