The ceilometer mid-cycle is virtual and starts tomorrow (Thursday
9th of July) at 0700 UTC. The topical agenda is here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ceilometer/Liberty_Virtual_Mid-Cycle
and the daily schedule is here:
Hello, all.
We have measured disk I/O performance on openstack virtual machines
with aid of
FIO tool. We've tested performance on root dist drive device, test
consists of write operationby 4kb
blocks to file with size 90Gb (prefilled in advance).
We use qcow2 image for vm, ephemeral drive
There were some questions from Alexandra Fedorova about independent release
cycle.
according to the configuration [1] Infra team won't be able to do
branching or any kind of release management for new repository.
Could you please clarify, do we plan to version new repository the
same way as we
+1 for enabling auto-abandon
Sergii, I think the period should be smaller, 2 weeks - 1 month,
if patch is important, the author will unabandon it.
Thanks,
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Sergii Golovatiuk sgolovat...@mirantis.com
wrote:
3 Months should be a good period. Sometimes, people have
Putting release notes in the git repo so that they simply will get
merged along with the corresponding code seems like a no-brainer. What
am I missing?
Soren Hansen | http://linux2go.dk/
Ubuntu Developer | http://www.ubuntu.com/
OpenStack Developer |
Hi, Jay!
As Doug said, Horizon regions are just different Keystone endpoints that
Horizon could use to authorize against (and retrieve the whole catalog from
any of them afterwards).
Another example of how complicated things could be: imagine that Horizon
config has two Keystone endpoints inside
There are two things to remember here.
1) When you configure the Congress datasource driver to talk to Murano, you
choose which user rights Congress should use. If you need to get all of
the tenants data, you want to choose an admin user for the Murano driver.
Personally I always use admin users
On 07/07/2015 10:36 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
How do you think which should we use uppercase vs lowercase for
representing project names?
I'll be patching the governance repo with some guidelines we have been
using to make them official. The projects.yaml file is the reference
point
On 2015-07-08 10:08:07 -0400 (-0400), Monty Taylor wrote:
On 07/08/2015 01:51 AM, Tristan Goode wrote:
[...]
So let's give up naming things like toys in our play crib, start acting
like grown ups and using semver or plain old integers. At worst, we might
have some people see bugs in version
Building Room 2402
OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado
Tricircle Weekly Meeting 20150708 chatlog.docx
Description: MS-Word 2007 document
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
Thanks Miguel!
On 07/08/2015 11:50 AM, Miguel Lavalle wrote:
Hi,
This message is to announce that I have volunteered to be the point of
contact in the Neutron team for the Nova Cells V2 effort.
Regards
Miguel Lavalle
IRC: mlavalle
This is great work! I see most of the devstack patches have now merged, and
the Neutron ones are merging to.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
Nice job all! Really awesome. I just approved 195653, so it will show up
in the check queue non voting shortly.
Hello TC members and fellow stackers!
We have just submitted a review for project Delux to the OpenStack
governance projects list.
The mission of Delux is to help the teams improve the overall user
experience (UX) of their projects. We provide user research to help teams
identify any issues
13 matches
Mail list logo
