I have been looking at
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/devstack/guides/neutron.html and
wonder about a few things.
In the section
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/devstack/guides/neutron.html#using-neutron-with-a-single-interface
there is a helpful display of localrc contents. It
Kris,
We are facing similar challenges/questions and there are some thoughts. We
cannot ignore scalability limits: Kub ~ 100 nodes (there are plans to support
1K next year), Swarm ~ ??? (I never heard
even about 100 nodes, definitely not ready for production yet (happy to be
wrong ;))), Mesos
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Alex Schultz wrote:
> So I was working on Bug 1493520 which is about what happens when a
> controller runs out of space. For this I came up with a solution[1] to
> leverage pacemaker to migrate services away from the controller when
> it
This needs to be brought to the attention of the new PTL for Neutron. The
original team that released the networking guide cannot be expected to carry
this work forward in perpetuity.
On October 2, 2015, at 6:45 PM, Lana Brindley
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
Sean, you're absolutely right; the Neutron team really needs to help us out.
Edgar, thank you so much for taking this on. You're right, I'm not
going away, I just don't have the strength for a sustained effort right
now. That said, if you have any isolated incidents where I can help,
please
I volunteer to lead this effort. From the very beginning was an idea between
Nick and myself and I do have the bandwidth to work on this guide.
There are still a lot of work to do and I will move the meetings to IRC and
also to formalize better the team by following all the Foundation
> On Oct 1, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
>> On 01 Oct 2015, at 17:42, Sean M. Collins wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 11:05:29AM EDT, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Sean M. Collins wrote:
thanks for sharing, useful indeed.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Ricardo Carrillo Cruz <
ricardo.carrillo.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Erm, yeah, I hear your pain with processing output with awk.
>
> Having the option to output CSV is cool :-).
> Thanks for sharing.
>
> Cheers
>
> 2015-10-02