Re: [openstack-dev] [Tacker][Tricircle]Multi-VIM collaboration

Sure. As mentioned in the BP we stumbled into Tricycle project while researching for this feature (and hence got mentioned in the BP). It sure looks promising. The immediate asks from our user community is quite modest though, so we are trying to keep the scope small. However the integration

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Dependencies of snapshots on volumes

On Dec 10, 2015 06:34, Mike Perez wrote: > On 09:27 Dec 09, John Griffith wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Li, Xiaoyan > wrote: > > > >>> As a result, this raises two concerns here: >>> 1. Let such operations behavior same in Cinder. >>> 2. I prefer to let

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tacker][Tricircle]Multi-VIM collaboration

Great :) On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Sridhar Ramaswamy wrote: > Sure. > > As mentioned in the BP we stumbled into Tricycle project while researching > for this feature (and hence got mentioned in the BP). It sure looks > promising. The immediate asks from our user

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-glanceclient] Return request-id to caller

-Original Message- From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] Sent: 09 December 2015 19:28 To: openstack-dev Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [python-glanceclient] Return request-id to caller Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-12-09 09:09:10 -0430: > On 09/12/15 11:33

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][glance][all] Removing deprecated functions from oslo_utils.timeutils

we have more projects like Trove/Maruno/Manila using deprecated method, I just did a simple search http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=timeutils.isotime=nope== 2015-12-09 17:54 GMT+08:00 Julien Danjou : > Hi fellow developers, > > Some oslo_utils.timeutils functions have

[openstack-dev] [ironic]Can not login machine by using Ironic

hi, all I have installed Ironic in my devstack. And I create a keypair in nova by using command: nova keypair-add --pub-key ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub new Next, I boot a vm in nova by using command: nova boot --image [image_id] --flavor [baremetal_id] --nic net-id=[net_id]

[openstack-dev] Mitaka Infra Sprint

Hi all, As discussed during the infra-meeting on Tuesday[0], the infra team will be holding a mid-cycle sprint to focus on infra-cloud[1]. The sprint is an opportunity to get in a room and really work through as much code and reviews as we can related to infra-cloud while having each other near by

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][glance][all] Removing deprecated functions from oslo_utils.timeutils

So clearly the deprecation process is not working as no one looks at the log messages and fix their own projects. Sigh! -- Dims On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 7:08 AM, ChangBo Guo wrote: > we have more projects like Trove/Maruno/Manila using deprecated method, I > just did a

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][glance][all] Removing deprecated functions from oslo_utils.timeutils

Shouldn't be to hard (although it's probably not on each oslo project, but on the consumers projects). The warnings module can turn warnings into raised exceptions with a simple command line switch btw... For example: $ python -Wonce Python 2.7.6 (default, Jun 22 2015, 17:58:13) [GCC 4.8.2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][glance][all] Removing deprecated functions from oslo_utils.timeutils

Robert, +1 to non-firedrill way as long as it's the individual projects that see the output and take action on it as appropriate. -- dims On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Robert Collins wrote: > I'm not suggesting we increase Oslo responsibilities, but that we need

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] summarizing the cross-project summit session on Mitaka themes

On 18:04 Nov 06, Doug Hellmann wrote: > One thing I forgot to mention in my original email was the discussion > about when we would have this themes conversation for the N cycle. > I had originally hoped we would discuss the themes online before > the summit, and that those would inform decisions

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][glance][all] Removing deprecated functions from oslo_utils.timeutils

On 10 December 2015 at 18:19, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > So clearly the deprecation process is not working as no one looks at > the log messages and fix their own projects. Sigh! I think we need some way to ensure that a deprecation has been done: perhaps a job that we can run

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept

On 9 December 2015 at 09:31, Doug Wiegley wrote: > > > On Dec 9, 2015, at 7:25 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > Excerpts from Armando M.'s message of 2015-12-08 22:46:16 -0800: > >> On 3 December 2015 at 02:21, Thierry Carrez

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept

On 9 December 2015 at 04:06, Sean Dague wrote: > On 12/09/2015 01:46 AM, Armando M. wrote: > > > > > > On 3 December 2015 at 02:21, Thierry Carrez > > wrote: > > > > Armando M. wrote: > > > On 2 December 2015 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept

On 9 December 2015 at 02:02, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Armando M. wrote: > > For whom of you is interested in the conversation, the topic was brought > > for discussion at the latest TC meeting [1]. Unfortunately I was unable > > to join, however I would like to try and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept

On 9 December 2015 at 06:25, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Armando M.'s message of 2015-12-08 22:46:16 -0800: > > On 3 December 2015 at 02:21, Thierry Carrez > wrote: > > > > > Armando M. wrote: > > > > On 2 December 2015 at 01:16, Thierry

[openstack-dev] Fwd: [QA] Meeting Thursday December 10th at 9:00 UTC

Hi everyone, Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be Thursday, November 26th at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel. The agenda for the meeting can be found here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] Split up python-midonetclient

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Galo Navarro wrote: > Hi, > >> I think the goal of this split is well explained by Sandro in the first >> mails of the chain: >> >> 1. Downstream packaging >> 2. Tagging the delivery properly as a library >> 3. Adding as a project on pypi > >

[openstack-dev] [ironic]Can't login machine by using ironic

hi, all I create a keypair in nova. So nova generates a key named "ironic" and I store the data into a file named "key". Then I boot a vm by using command "nova boot --image 9eb9d034-a33b-421d-8c9d-a960597e4101 --flavor 7095f52d-d438-44c3-bdf7-ca5cca3012bd --nic

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] Split up python-midonetclient

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Galo Navarro wrote: > Hi, > >> I think the goal of this split is well explained by Sandro in the first >> mails of the chain: >> >> 1. Downstream packaging >> 2. Tagging the delivery properly as a library >> 3. Adding as a project on pypi > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][glance][all] Removing deprecated functions from oslo_utils.timeutils

Rob, This is a shared responsibility. I am stating that projects using oslo are failing to take up their share of things to be done. No, we should not increase more responsibility on Oslo team. -- Dims On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 10

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] Split up python-midonetclient

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Guillermo Ontañón wrote: > Hi Sandro, > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Sandro Mathys wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As Takashi Yamamoto raised in another thread [0], python-midonetclient >> should be split out into its own repo

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][glance][all] Removing deprecated functions from oslo_utils.timeutils

Maybe before we remove any deprecated things from oslo . we can file a bug for projects with deprecated thing. We can use code search to find out in master branch , but there is potential problems. If project 's stable branch didn't cap the version of oslo library. 2015-12-10 13:41 GMT+08:00

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][glance][all] Removing deprecated functions from oslo_utils.timeutils

I'm not suggesting we increase Oslo responsibilities, but that we need a non fire drill way to signal that the work hasn't been done. On 10 Dec 2015 6:42 PM, "Davanum Srinivas" wrote: > Rob, > > This is a shared responsibility. I am stating that projects using oslo > are

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-glanceclient] Return request-id to caller

gt;> Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence >>> for the sole use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged, >>> confidential, and proprietary data. If you are not the intended recipient, >>> please advise the sender by reply

Re: [openstack-dev] Mitaka Infra Sprint

Thanks josh --   Spencer Krum   n...@spencerkrum.com On Wed, Dec 9, 2015, at 09:17 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > Hi all, > As discussed during the infra-meeting on Tuesday[0], the infra team will be > holding a mid-cycle sprint to focus on infra-cloud[1]. > The sprint is an opportunity to

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] Split up python-midonetclient

On 10 December 2015 at 04:35, Sandro Mathys wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Galo Navarro wrote: > > Hi, > > > >> I think the goal of this split is well explained by Sandro in the first > >> mails of the chain: > >> > >> 1. Downstream packaging

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Dependencies of snapshots on volumes

On 12/09/2015 10:27 AM, John Griffith wrote: On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Li, Xiaoyan > wrote: Hi all, Currently when deleting a volume, it checks whether there are snapshots created from it. If yes deletion is prohibited.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Dependencies of snapshots on volumes

Hi, FWIW, I completely agree with what John said. All of it. Please don't do that. Jordan __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

<    1   2