Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] [Cinder] [Nova] [Neutron] Gathering quota usage data in Horizon

On a cloud with a large number of tenants, this is going to involve a large number of API calls. I'd suggest you put a spec into cinder to add an API call for getting the totals straight out of the DB - it should be easy enough to add. On 18 December 2015 at 20:35, Timur Sufiev wrote: > Matt, >

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Merge Freeze for cutting stable/8.0 branch

Hi Fuelers, SCF has been declared [1] and we start creating stable/8.0 branch in all projects. Please don't merge anything both to master and to stable/8.0 until we verify Infra and CI readiness. List of projects affected: fuel-main fuel-agent fuel-astute fuel-library fuel-menu fuel

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How to make deb and rpm packages for a networking-* project?

On 22/12/15 16:05, P. Ramanjaneya Reddy wrote: > Changes are not merged to upstream still, we need to generate the rpm or > deb with local changes. > Please describe the steps/method how to generate.. > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Jaume Devesa > wrote: One can ap

[openstack-dev] [fuel] 8.0 Soft Code Freeze

Soft Code Freeze for Fuel 8.0 is now in effect. As of now, only fixes for High and Critical severity bugs are allowed to be merged for Fuel 8.0. Shortly, Fuel Infra team will start creating stable/8.0 branches in git repositories for all Fuel components. Please wait for the announcement from the I

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum][heat] Quota for Magnum Resources

Thanks Vilobh and Clint! @Clint, Yes, what I meant for #2 is exactly as Vilobh mentioned "A request is within CaaS layer quota, and accepted by magnum. Magnum calls Heat to create a stack, which will fail if the stack exceeds IaaS layer quota. In this case, magnum catch and re-throw the exception

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] deprecation warning everywhere issue

I've pinged you on IRC to this effect but this has broken the stable branches which now have unresolvable dependencies on the service whose name has changed. Error: Could not find resource 'Keystone_endpoint[RegionOne/glance]' for relationship on 'Service[glance-api]' on node openstack-puppet-tes

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Python 2.6 should rise from the dead

Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-12-16 15:28:39 +0100: > On 12/16/2015 02:22 PM, Andrey Kurilin wrote: > >>If it had py26 classifiers, that was an error. > > > > The list of libraries with py26 classifiers is too huge: > > astara - stable/kilo, stable/liberty > > astara-appliance - s

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit Upgrade to ver 2.11, completed.

I noticed another thing. I'm working with a chain of three patches. I just updated the patch in the middle [1] to patch set 37. I noticed that the list of "Related Changes" (in the upper right of the page) didn't look right. The change above it in the list (the one that depends it) looked strang

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] stable/liberty branch needed for oslo-incubator

Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2015-12-17 10:59:03 -0500: > Thierry, > > Right, i believe it was on IRC and not a ML thread. Since there is no > urgency on this one, we can wait till Doug gets back to revisit the > decision. When we started removing more modules from the incub

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][QA] Changing logging format to match documented defaults

Excerpts from Ian Wienand's message of 2015-12-23 07:22:39 +1100: > On 12/23/2015 05:55 AM, Ronald Bradford wrote: > > I have observed that devstack uses custom logging formatting that > > differs from the documented defaults. An example is for nova. which > > is defined in [1] > > The original p

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit Upgrade to ver 2.11, completed.

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Zaro wrote: > Hit '?' and it says '/' is find, give that a try. '/' isn't really much better. It seems to highlight all of the occurrences but I can't find a way to navigate to the next/previous occurence with the keyboard. I see that the scroll bar shows a smal

[openstack-dev] Configuring ISC dhclient on guest to acquire ipv6 default gateway

Hi all, I've been trying for a few days to understand how this should work. My guest OS is Linux based, using ISC dhclient. In devstack I have configured an ipv6 net and subnet: [stack@localhost images]$ neutron net-show private6 +---+

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] deprecation warning everywhere issue

Thanks Emilien, This is what I was mentioning to you on IRC last week as a must fix for Mitaka. I'd like to also backport this to Liberty once it lands. On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hello, > > I just reported [1] which affects puppet-keystone but also *all* modules.

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][QA] Changing logging format to match documented defaults

On 12/23/2015 05:55 AM, Ronald Bradford wrote: > I have observed that devstack uses custom logging formatting that > differs from the documented defaults. An example is for nova. which > is defined in [1] The original point mentioned there of using "*_name" for extra verbosity still seems relevan

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Solar] SolarDB/ConfigDB place in Fuel

Hello, everybody. It's a week old thread and I should've jumped in earlier. Better late than never. On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:04 AM Dmitriy Shulyak wrote: > Hello folks, > > This topic is about configuration storage which will connect data sources > (nailgun/bareon/others) and orchestration. An

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit Upgrade to ver 2.11, completed.

I had the same issue with Android. I eventually had to give up and leave comments on the patch instead of specific line numbers. On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Jay Bryant wrote: > All, > > Has anyone found a way to do code reviews on an iPad. In the old Gerrit > you could. With the new interfa

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] whether the ServiceGroup in Cinder is necessary

Hmm, I see. There's this spec[1] that was discussed in the past with a similar proposal. There's a SPEC with some other points on the discussion, I think Janice forgot to mention. Erlon [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176233/ [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/258968/ On Tue, Dec 22, 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit Upgrade to ver 2.11, completed.

Hi there, I noticed a couple of things which I would like to see fixed. 1. When you try to reply to a review comment, it jumps to the previous or next comment and you have to scroll again to get back to it. 2. When you scroll down through a file, the Patch Set bar gets hidden. You have to scro

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Is Swift a good choice of database for the TripleO API?

On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 15:36 +, Dougal Matthews wrote: > Hi all, > > This topic came up in the 2015-12-15 meeting[1], and again briefly > today. > After working with the code that came out of the deployment library > spec[2] I > had some concerns with how we are storing the templates. > > Simp

[openstack-dev] [neutron] neutron-lib meetings canceled 12/23, 12/30

Happy holidays, see you all on 1/6. Thanks, doug __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/m

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum][heat] Quota for Magnum Resources

Clint, To be more specific about the #2 option I was talking about is " A request is within CaaS layer quota, and accepted by magnum. Magnum calls Heat to create a stack, which will fail if the stack exceeds IaaS layer quota. In this case, magnum catch and re-throw the exception to users." -Vilo

[openstack-dev] [devstack][QA] Changing logging format to match documented defaults

Hi All, I have observed that devstack uses custom logging formatting that differs from the documented defaults. An example is for nova. logging_context_format_string = %(asctime)s.%(msecs)03d %(levelname)s %(name)s [%(request_id)s *%(user_name)s %(project_name)s*] %(instance)s%(message)s which i

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Mitaka Infra Sprint

On 2015-12-21 11:27:32 -0800 (-0800), Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: [...] > Finally, I propose a sign up cutoff of Friday, January 29th for sign > ups so we have enough time to place orders, etc. If this deadline makes things easier on our hosts, then who am I to disagree? It seems like plenty of tim

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Is Swift a good choice of database for the TripleO API?

On Tue, Dec 22 2015, Dougal Matthews wrote: > - Store the files in a tarball (so we only deal with one file). I think we >could still hit issues with multiple operations unless we guarantee that >only one instance of the API is ever running. That shouldn't be a problem since the store/up

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Is Swift a good choice of database for the TripleO API?

On 12/22/2015 11:17 AM, Tomas Sedovic wrote: > On 12/22/2015 04:36 PM, Dougal Matthews wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This topic came up in the 2015-12-15 meeting[1], and again briefly today. >> After working with the code that came out of the deployment library >> spec[2] I >> had some concerns with how

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Is Swift a good choice of database for the TripleO API?

Can we just do git like I've been suggesting all along? ;-) More serious discussion inline. :-) On 12/22/2015 09:36 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: > Hi all, > > This topic came up in the 2015-12-15 meeting[1], and again briefly today. > After working with the code that came out of the deployment lib

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Removing the Tuskar repos

+1 On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Jason Rist wrote: > On 12/22/2015 04:38 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I mentioned this at the meeting last week, but wanted to get wider input. > > As far as I can tell from the current activity, there is no work going > into > > Tuskar and i

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Removing the Tuskar repos

On 12/22/2015 04:38 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: > Hi all, > > I mentioned this at the meeting last week, but wanted to get wider input. > As far as I can tell from the current activity, there is no work going into > Tuskar and it isn't being tested with CI. This means the code is becoming > more st

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Removing the Tuskar repos

+1. I've already proposed a patch to remove it from instack-undercloud since the last report I got said it doesn't work anyway. On 12/22/2015 05:38 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: > Hi all, > > I mentioned this at the meeting last week, but wanted to get wider > input. As far as I can tell from the c

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Multirack] Are we going to support Ceph Multirack deployments?

Folks, multirack is going to be a part of MOS 8.0. But i can not find any info about Ceph? Technically Ceph supports Multiple L3 networks [1]. [1] - http://docs.ceph.com/docs/hammer/rados/configuration/network-config-ref/#network-config-settings -- Roman Sokolkov, Deployment Engineer, Miranti

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Is Swift a good choice of database for the TripleO API?

On 12/22/2015 04:36 PM, Dougal Matthews wrote: Hi all, This topic came up in the 2015-12-15 meeting[1], and again briefly today. After working with the code that came out of the deployment library spec[2] I had some concerns with how we are storing the templates. For alternatives, I see a c

[openstack-dev] [mistral] [murano] [yaql] An online YAQL evaluator [was RE: [mistral] [murano] An online YAQL evaluator]

Hi all, Thank you for the kind words. Just wanted to let you know that yaqluator[1] was updated and now supports YAQL 1.0.2. There is also a checkbox there to work in "Legacy Mode". Hope you will find it useful. [1] http://yaqluator.com/ From: Renat Akhmerov [mailto:rakhme...@mirantis.com] Se

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Is Swift a good choice of database for the TripleO API?

Excerpts from Dougal Matthews's message of 2015-12-22 07:36:02 -0800: > Hi all, > > This topic came up in the 2015-12-15 meeting[1], and again briefly today. > After working with the code that came out of the deployment library spec[2] > I > had some concerns with how we are storing the templates.

Re: [openstack-dev] New things in Gerrit 2.11 to enjoy

On 12/17/2015 01:44 PM, Sean Dague wrote: While I realize there is some sentiment about people not liking the UI changes in Gerrit 2.11, I thought I'd provide you with some reasons to like new gerrit. New Search Strings: * patch size delta:<=10 - show only patches with <= 10 lines of change *

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Separating Web UI from nailgun

Dear colleagues, The next step in separating fuel-web repository into several sub-projects is to move Web UI to fuel-ui git repo. Checklist for this is as follows: - Launchpad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1471763 - openstack-infra - project-config https://review.openstack.or

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][nova][all] timeutils deprecation removals will break Nova

On 12/21/2015 11:53 PM, ChangBo Guo wrote: 2015-12-22 3:42 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>>: On 12/21/2015 1:22 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Rob, Can we set some goals for the server projects too? Say anything deprecated in liberty

[openstack-dev] [watcher] No IRC weekly meetings on December 23rd and 30th

Dear Watcher team Our weekly IRC meetings on December 23rd and 30th are canceled due to the holidays. Next meeting will take place on January 6th at the usual time on #openstack-meeting-4 at 1400 UTC. The team is atill available to answer questions and help on #openstack-watcher Regards Susanne

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove][Outreachy] Add configuration groups for CouchDB

Victoria, As several people are now on holiday (and likely through the end of the year), you may not receive an answer either positive or otherwise before the New Year. Please take that into consideration in your project choice. -amrith From: Victoria Martínez de la Cruz [mailto:victo...@vmart

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Removal of support for nova-network

Corresponding ticket: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1528613 (Prohibit creation of Nova-Network enabled 8.0 environments) Aleksey Kasatkin On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Sheena Gregson wrote: > I agree – I don’t think we can change the user’s ability to manage old > releases. This w

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Is Swift a good choice of database for the TripleO API?

Hi all, This topic came up in the 2015-12-15 meeting[1], and again briefly today. After working with the code that came out of the deployment library spec[2] I had some concerns with how we are storing the templates. Simply put, when we are dealing with 100+ files from tripleo-heat-templates how

[openstack-dev] [all] IRC meetings warning: two "odd" weeks coming up

Hi everyone, Bi-weekly meetings are going to be affected by the new year, as two odd ISO week numbers are following each other. Week 52: Dec 21 - Jan 27 Week 53: Dec 28 - Jan 3 Week 1: Jan 4 - Jan 10 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_week_date That means on the week of Jan 4th we'll hold "b

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit Upgrade to ver 2.11, completed.

All, Has anyone found a way to do code reviews on an iPad. In the old Gerrit you could. With the new interface attempts to enter comments don't work. It looks like you should be able to enter text but when you type the page just jumps around. Very frustrating. I have tried Safari and Chrome with

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How to make deb and rpm packages for a networking-* project?

Changes are not merged to upstream still, we need to generate the rpm or deb with local changes. Please describe the steps/method how to generate.. On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Jaume Devesa wrote: > Hi, > > To create a deb, you can look at the debian repositories as example: > http://anonscm

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Manila] running tox py27 - unit tests - very slow - can i run it in parts?

On 12/22/2015 08:51 AM, Knight, Clinton wrote: @Matt: The Manila team is writing new 1st-party drivers that should be much faster & more reliable in the gate. @Nidhi: Here are a couple more suggestions for working with unit tests more efficiently: 1. Use PyCharm. You can set up test configur

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum][heat] Quota for Magnum Resources

Excerpts from Jay Lau's message of 2015-12-21 22:29:14 -0800: > For case 2), can we talk this with HEAT team? This seems to be a issue > related to HEAT quota, why HEAT do not add quota support? > It's been brought up before, and I made the same arguments against it there as I did here. I argued

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Manila] running tox py27 - unit tests - very slow - can i run it in parts?

@Matt: The Manila team is writing new 1st-party drivers that should be much faster & more reliable in the gate. @Nidhi: Here are a couple more suggestions for working with unit tests more efficiently: 1. Use PyCharm. You can set up test configurations to run unit tests on a single file or a di

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: Return request-id to caller

Excerpts from Kekane, Abhishek's message of 2015-12-18 06:27:59 +: > Hi Devs, > > I have submitted a cross-project specs [1] for returning request-id to the > caller which was approved. For implementation we have submitted patches in > python-cinderclient [2] as per design in cross-project s

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][Neutron] Is there a tool of generating network topology?

Check it out: https://github.com/jbenc/plotnetcfg On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Gareth wrote: > Hi, networking guys, > > For example, we could use it to generate a png file or print ascii in > command line. Is there something like this? > > -- > Gareth > > Cloud Computing, OpenStack, Distribu

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-keystoneclient] return-request-id-to-caller

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:02 AM, koshiya maho wrote: > Hi, > > I want to add support for returning 'x-openstack-request-id' in > python-keystoneclient as per the design proposed in cross-project specs. > > Cross-project spec has been already approved. : > > https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/o

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Manila] running tox py27 - unit tests - very slow - can i run it in parts?

On 12/22/2015 6:40 AM, nidhi.h...@wipro.com wrote: Thank you very much Martin. -Original Message- From: Martin Hickey [mailto:martin.hic...@ie.ibm.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 5:56 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-d

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Removal of support for nova-network

I agree – I don’t think we can change the user’s ability to manage old releases. This work should be about preventing the selection of nova-network for new environments on 8.0 release and later – we should restrict this via all methods of interaction, including UI, CLI and API if possible. *Fro

[openstack-dev] [murano] why not abandon launchpad milestones and/or blueprints?

Hi all. A couple of meetings ago I brought this up and promised to start a discussion in the ML. There are two ideas behind this letter: 1st) Since we (and openstack at large) started using reno for release notes — launchpad milestones became redundant as a tracking tool of what have been done

[openstack-dev] [Trove][Outreachy] Add configuration groups for CouchDB

Hi all, For those who are not aware, we have 7 Outreachy interns [0] working on different projects on OpenStack since last Dec 7th. Sonali (sonali5) will be working with us on Trove and we have been trying to locate a task for her to work on during her internship. Before the internship was annou

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] whether the ServiceGroup in Cinder is necessary

On 12/22/2015 01:29 PM, Erlon Cruz wrote: > Hi Li, > > Can you give a quick background on servicegroups (or links to. The > spec you linked only describe the process on Nova to change from what > they are using to tooz)? Also, what are the use cases and benefits of > using this? > > Erlon > This i

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][library] CI gate for regressions detection in deployment data

Hi, btw, right now we have 33 outdated astute.yaml fixtures for noop rspec tests [0] - and this number is based on a single parameter of network_metadata['vips'] hash, actual amount of outdated fixtures could be bigger. So I've registered a new BP [1] to create a script that will generate up-to-da

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Manila] running tox py27 - unit tests - very slow - can i run it in parts?

Thank you very much Martin. -Original Message- From: Martin Hickey [mailto:martin.hic...@ie.ibm.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 5:56 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Manila] running tox py27 - unit te

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] whether the ServiceGroup in Cinder is necessary

Hi Li, Can you give a quick background on servicegroups (or links to. The spec you linked only describe the process on Nova to change from what they are using to tooz)? Also, what are the use cases and benefits of using this? Erlon On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Michał Dulko wrote: > On 12/1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Manila] running tox py27 - unit tests - very slow - can i run it in parts?

Hi Nidhi, You can run particular tests as follows: tox -e py27 For example in neutron, you could run: tox -e py27 neutron.tests.unit.test_manager.NeutronManagerTestCase I hope this helps. Regards, Martin From: To: Date: 22/12/2015 12:18 Subject:[openstack-dev] [Openstack-

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] RFC: profile matching

On 11/09/2015 03:51 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi folks! I spent some time thinking about bringing profile matching back in, so I'd like to get your comments on the following near-future plan. First, the scope of the problem. What we do is essentially kind of capability discovery. We'll help nov

[openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Manila] running tox py27 - unit tests - very slow - can i run it in parts?

Hi all, While doing some development I changed a unit test. To confirm test is passing or not I am running tox -v -epy27. Now its very very slow .. takes a lot of time complete its run .. Difficult during development to make changes and test.. Is there a way that I can run some unit tests specif

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][nova][all] timeutils deprecation removals will break Nova

Just check we have removed deprecated methods in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241179/ for Nova. So current there is no work from Nova side now. 2015-12-22 13:53 GMT+08:00 ChangBo Guo : > > > 2015-12-22 3:42 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > >> >> >> On 12/21/2015 1:22 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [tempest]

Hello, How to run external tempest plugins in the gating? Now tempest doesn't containt thirdparty tests... They was removed in [1]. And now they present in someone repository [2] and in several forks. I know how to run tempest plugin in the gating if tempest plugin is contained in one of install

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Removing the Tuskar repos

Hi all, I mentioned this at the meeting last week, but wanted to get wider input. As far as I can tell from the current activity, there is no work going into Tuskar and it isn't being tested with CI. This means the code is becoming more stale quickly and likely wont work soon (if not already). Tr

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit Upgrade to ver 2.11, completed.

- Original Message - > From: "Lenny Verkhovsky" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > Hi, > After Upgrading to 2.11 seems that > lastcomment ( > https://github.com/openstack/third-party-ci-tools/tree/master/monitoring/lastcomment-scoreboard > ) > m

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] whether the ServiceGroup in Cinder is necessary

On 12/17/2015 04:49 AM, li.yuanz...@zte.com.cn wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to start discussion on whether the servicegroup in Cinder > is necessary. > > Recently, cinder can only support db driver, and doesn't have > servicegroup concept. > our team wants to implement the servicegroup fea

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How to make deb and rpm packages for a networking-* project?

Hi, To create a deb, you can look at the debian repositories as example: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/openstack?q=networking For rpm, there is the Red Hat maintained `openstack-packages` organization in GitHub: https://github.com/openstack-packages/?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=networking Take a look

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][DRBD] questions about pep8/flake8 etc.

On 21/12, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: > On 12/21/2015 06:40 AM, Philipp Marek wrote: > >Hi everybody, > > > >in the current patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/259973/1 the test > >script needs to use a lot of the constant definitions of the backend driver > >it's using (DRBDmanage). > > > >As th

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Removal of support for nova-network

Sergii, Nailgun will still have data of clusters with old releases, should they be in the database backup. And it still has to be able to manage them. -- Best regards, Oleg Gelbukh On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Sergii Golovatiuk < sgolovat...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi, > > There won't be up

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit Upgrade to ver 2.11, completed.

Hi, After Upgrading to 2.11 seems that lastcomment ( https://github.com/openstack/third-party-ci-tools/tree/master/monitoring/lastcomment-scoreboard ) monitoring tool stopped working I've posted a small patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/259083/ to fix the issue, But I wander if there is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Removal of support for nova-network

Hi, There won't be upgrade to 8.0. User will be able to backup and load data to a new master node. nova-network has been deprecated for 2 releases so we can remove it. If we remove it we can remove tests from acceptance testing as well as from auto-tests so it should remove tech debt so will relea

[openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum]a problem about trust

Hi all, When we create a trust to a trustee with a role, the trustor must have this role. Here is a problem I meet in my bp [1]. I need to create a trust with a role, with the trust docker registry can access Swift to store images. But the trustor (the user who uses magnum) may not have the role.

[openstack-dev] [tempest][refstack] Data driven testing for tempest

Hi folks, I have a question for the refstack team. Does the idempotent_id has to be unique for a single test? To give more context: the ddt framework [1] will generate multiple similar tests with different data set. In the current implementation it’s something like a for- loop within the test its

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting #64

On 12/21/2015 03:54 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > For Christmas survivors, we can handle a weekly meeting tomorrow: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20151222 The agenda looks empty (except 2 reviews that we can take of in async on IRC). So we postpone meeti

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Removal of support for nova-network

Hi, We mustn't touch Nailgun's logic, otherwise after upgrade user won't be able to manage her/his old nova Cluster. So lets just remove it from UI. Also as far as I know we should provide a way to manage old clusters not for a release, but for a couple of years. Thanks, On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at

[openstack-dev] [python-keystoneclient] return-request-id-to-caller

Hi, I want to add support for returning 'x-openstack-request-id' in python-keystoneclient as per the design proposed in cross-project specs. Cross-project spec has been already approved. : https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-specs/specs/return-request-id.html So, I'd like you to app